• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Kobe "persecutors" want to dismiss case for now?

Status
Not open for further replies.

SteveMeister

Hang out with Steve.
There's no way a judge'll agree to that. The accused has a Constitutionally guaranteed right to a speedy trial. A motion to delay would violate that right at this point.
 

Phoenix

Member
SteveMeister said:
There's no way a judge'll agree to that. The accused has a Constitutionally guaranteed right to a speedy trial. A motion to delay would violate that right at this point.



Prosecutors have agreed to dismiss sexual assault charges against Los Angeles Lakers star Kobe Bryant with one big catch

Sounds more like the defense is agreeing to this. This isn't a motion to delay. This is an agreement to delay according to the story.
 

Phoenix

Member
EAGLE, Colo. (AP) -- Attorneys for NBA star Kobe Bryant asked the judge to dismiss the sexual assault charge against him, saying prosecutors have refused to turn over details that could suggest he is innocent.

Court rules require prosecutors and defense attorneys to exchange evidence and witness opinions before trial, a process called discovery.


In a motion made public Wednesday, defense attorneys said a forensics expert whom prosecutors had planned to call as a witness had information that "undermined the accuser's allegations and the prosecution's case, and corroborated Mr. Bryant's defense on a central issue -- the cause and significance of the accuser's alleged injuries."


The filing said those opinions were not disclosed to the defense until they contacted the expert Friday, despite repeated requests to prosecutors for the information. Prosecutors have said they have turned over all information they were required to.

The judge gave prosecutors until Tuesday -- the day opening statements are scheduled to begin -- to respond to the defense motion.

"A person's life and liberty are at stake," the defense attorneys wrote. "The game of hide-the-ball, find-it-if-you-can discovery is intolerable."

Defense attorneys asked that the judge either dismiss the case or bar prosecutors from introducing any expert testimony relating to the accuser's injuries.

The motion does not identify the expert, but prosecutors this spring had said they planned to call former New York City medical examiner Michael Baden to testify about the woman's injuries.

District Attorney Mark Hurlbert said during a July 19 hearing that he had decided against using Baden. He did not elaborate. Prosecution spokeswoman Krista Flannigan declined to comment, citing a gag order imposed by the judge.

The motion was first reported by ABC News, which cited unidentified sources who said Baden told prosecutors the woman's injuries could have been caused by consensual sex. A message left for Baden was not immediately returned.


Motions to dismiss on the eve of trial are not uncommon and often are unsuccessful, said Scott Robinson, a defense attorney familiar with the case. He said the judge likely will schedule a hearing quickly because if such motions are granted after a jury is sworn in, charges cannot be refiled.


Bryant, 26, has said he had consensual sex with a then-19-year-old employee of a Vail-area resort where he stayed last summer. If convicted of felony sexual assault, he would face four years to life in prison or 20 years to life on probation, and a fine up to $750,000.

Meanwhile, the last round of questioning of individual jury candidates resumed Wednesday. In all, 160 prospective jurors have been questioned through Tuesday with 40 more to go.

Open-court jury selection is expected to begin Thursday, with opening statements scheduled for Tuesday. The jury will include 12 panelists and two alternates.

This makes a lot more sense

Sports Illustrated Link
 
Baden's comments to the LA Times:

In an interview with The Times last week, Baden said he submitted one bill to Eagle County Dist. Atty. Mark Hurlbert for consultation on a range of evidence, including the accuser's genital injuries, small jaw bruise and DNA results.

Baden said the evidence is inconclusive.

"There are serious issues in this case regarding whether this act was consensual or nonconsensual," he said. "None of the findings tell you whether or not she said no to Kobe Bryant, and that's independent of whether she had sex with someone else before or after their encounter.

"One can show there has been sexual contact, but the other evidence is going to be argued to the points of, 'Was this consensual or nonconsensual?' You can have injuries in consensual sex, and you can have no injuries in nonconsensual sex."

Haddon said Baden told prosecutors that the microscopic lacerations between the accuser's vagina and anus could have come from consensual sex. Baden's opinions vindicate Bryant, Haddon said, and should have been turned over to the defense.
 

SyNapSe

Member
yeah, the PTI guys said it was breaking during their closing comments, and then it was the first thing on Sportscenter.
 

bishoptl

Banstick Emeritus
FREE KOBE!

kobegta.jpg
 

bionic77

Member
This DA should be disbarred.

I can't really blame that stupid whore for lying as much as him because he is the one with a duty to uphold justice.
 

DarienA

The black man everyone at Activision can agree on
*ding* *ding* *ding*

And it's all over ladies' and gentleman! In the middle of the fight we have a TKO... and your winner.... Kobeeeeeeeee FHUTA Bryantttttttttt!!!
 

Cooper

Member
retardboy said:
Haha, his actual real middle name sounds more funny... Who in their right minds would name their kid bean?

The same people who name their kid after a type of beef?
 

bjork

Member
Yet another reason for me to justify sending my jury duty notices into the trash.

What a load of wasted time and money.

ps - he was guilty
 
bjork said:
Yet another reason for me to justify sending my jury duty notices into the trash.

What a load of wasted time and money.

ps - he was guilty

obviously not. if he was so guilty, then the DA would have had no problems gathering evidence and presenting a legitimate case to the jurors.

ps - he was innocent
 

Guzim

Member
The only thing Kobe is guility of is cheating on his wife and trying to be like MJ. But the last comment is for a different day and thread :)
 

bjork

Member
Slo said:
OJ was guilty, Kobe is not even guilty enough to be brought to trial.

To use a line from earlier:

"obviously not. if he was so guilty, then the DA would have had no problems gathering evidence and presenting a legitimate case to the jurors."
 

bjork

Member
I don't know about you, but if I was innocent, I wouldn't be buying a huge ass ring like that just to be nice.

$4 million is $4 million, no matter your yearly income. He did something... maybe he was making up for some other time when he got away with it or something.
 

Bowser

Member
bjork said:
I don't know about you, but if I was innocent, I wouldn't be buying a huge ass ring like that just to be nice.

$4 million is $4 million, no matter your yearly income. He did something... maybe he was making up for some other time when he got away with it or something.

Or maybe he wanted to get out of his wife's dog house...but shit, what do I know. You're right.

edit: BTW, he did do something. He had SEX. With another WOMAN. Sex =/= Rape.
 
bjork said:
I don't know about you, but if I was innocent, I wouldn't be buying a huge ass ring like that just to be nice.

$4 million is $4 million, no matter your yearly income. He did something... maybe he was making up for some other time when he got away with it or something.

uh, yea he did something. he cheated on his wife. doesn't mean he raped the girl.

jesus.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom