Robobandit
Member
Gahiggidy said:
Yeah, I'd say that Owl is just about right for the job.
Gahiggidy said:
Kobun Heat said:...
there are no owls to describe my pain
Bluemercury said:So when we will hear about what's inside that small case???
Robobandit said:I think it would be amusing if they never told us specs.. but just gave us games..
maharg said:Frankly, the difference is virtually moot. So long as the game provides appropriate feedback to your motion, your brain will be tricked into believing whatever it needs to to play. However, the central issue here is the statement by Nintendo themselves that calibration is not needed, which conflicts with the idea of the cursor knowing exactly where on the screen you are pointing (as opposed to merely making it look like it does through visual cues). There is quite simply no magic bullet that can make it not require calibration for that with everything we have been told by Jim Merrick.
Which is not to say that some games might not actually require and use calibration to achieve that effect. In this way, the so-called 'laser pointer' effect is really a subset of the '3d mouse' functionality. This is imo the most realistic view of things.
Iwata@TGS said:On the front of this controller is a brand new sensor which we call the direct pointing device. This powers Revolution to detect precisely which location on the screen the controller is pointing towards. With this technology you can not only point at a location intuitively, Revolution can also detect the distance from the screen and even the angle of the controller.
Robobandit said:I think it would be amusing if they never told us specs.. but just gave us games..
I believe there's a bunch of Oompa Loompas in thereBluemercury said:So when we will hear about what's inside that small case???
maharg said:I don't think Nintendo has ever officially released hard tech specs on any of their consoles. Even the N64, for which they were only too happy to talk up technical prowess on, was never officially specced out publicly, and in terms of raw throughput there is even still debate on the matter.
So I guess prepare to be amused.
Robobandit said:They did release specs for the Gamecube, though they only said it was capable of a modest 6 million polys per second, whereas microsoft claimed 120 million and sony claimed 66 million.
Kobun Heat said:Things may have been discussed. Do you think I'm going to say anything about them on GAF, though?
No, but if somebody tells me something in confidence and then I go and WRITE IT ON THE INTERNET wouldn't that, uh, seriously impair their trust in me? Why the hell would I do that?Leatherface said:Is there some kind of NDA against hearsay or something? heh.
Kobun Heat said:No, but if somebody tells me something in confidence and then I go and WRITE IT ON THE INTERNET wouldn't that, uh, seriously impair their trust in me? Why the hell would I do that?
I'm not harboring any big secrets. But I do expect that more Revolution news will happen between now and E3. If anyone wants to assume that it's some kind of big explosive world-shattering secret and call it SOMETIMEINTHENEXTSEVENMONTHSATON!!!1 then go ahead. But anyone who does is retarded.
Leatherface said:You don't have to be a douche about it. I was just asking. For all I know you could have over heard a couple random industry folk talking about some things that they anticipate to happen. That's a little more so what I was getting at. Anyway, If you're gonna get all bitchy when someone asks you a fucking question, then don't come parading in here offering to answer them.. >:|
I think he's answered enough fuckin' questions in this thread already. Some of them many times over.Leatherface said:You don't have to be a douche about it. I was just asking. For all I know you could have over heard a couple random industry folk talking about some things that they anticipate to happen. That's a little more so what I was getting at. Anyway, If you're gonna get all bitchy when someone asks you a fucking question, then don't come parading in here offering to answer them.. >:|
Mallrat83 said:I think he's answered enough fuckin' questions in this thread already. Some of them many times over.
Well, I'm grateful because of that, his answers were very informative, but I think he should've ignored some posts and questions though since some people weren't informed about the controller that much and stuff so they asked redundant questions.Mallrat83 said:I think he's answered enough fuckin' questions in this thread already. Some of them many times over.
sp0rsk said:jesus christ.
Got some cheese to go with that whine?Leatherface said:What are you his spokeswomen? stfu. He doesn't have to answer any more then he wants to. I definately appreciate the info he's given. however, there is no excuse for being a douche bag when someone posts a legitamate question. If the guy doesn't feel like answering anything else, he simply doesn't have to respond. Stop riding his knob.
Fuckin' aye.Leatherface said:What are you his spokeswomen? stfu. He doesn't have to answer any more then he wants to. I definately appreciate the info he's given. however, there is no excuse for being a douche bag when someone posts a legitamate question. If the guy doesn't feel like answering anything else, he simply doesn't have to respond. Stop riding his knob.
:lollevious said:this thread needs to be re-calibrated.
Kobun Heat said:In the plane demo, you made the plane loop-the-loop by pretending the controller is a toy plane and flipping it over in your hands.
sp0rsk said:jesus christ.