I do, which I think is great. But I can't ignore the fact that this game got canned once before, so I'm not terribly excited.Blizzard said:Does no one think it looks Tim Burtonesque?![]()
I do, which I think is great. But I can't ignore the fact that this game got canned once before, so I'm not terribly excited.Blizzard said:Does no one think it looks Tim Burtonesque?![]()
5 years ago... I'm sure plenty has changed.M74 said:I do, which I think is great. But I can't ignore the fact that this game got canned once before, so I'm not terribly excited.
M74 said:I do, which I think is great. But I can't ignore the fact that this game got canned once before, so I'm not terribly excited.
The game cost USD 11.8 million and 4.5 years to produce.
At its peak, team consist of 42 full time and 5 contractors. A bit of trivia about this game, lines of code: 166,781 in 381 files in C++, game script: 332,650 in 2,433 files in LUA, lines of code tools: 81,260 lines in 445 files in C++/C#, 11,318 lines in 51 files in Python.
The outcome? The game sold a combined 15,000 units (Xbox + PS2) in June, with the PC version faring no better.
Jag22 said:Is the Wii's library so poor that people are actually excited for this game?
Because i'm pretty sure there's a reason it was cancelled. Just like there was a good reason publishers kept dropping Malice, it was a piece of poo.
Squeak said:So very generic.
i do. which is a huge plus in my book.Blizzard said:Does no one think it looks Tim Burtonesque?![]()
Well lets pair up some Pics. . .cause from what I see thats not the case.M74 said:Wii version looks worse (graphically) than the original Xbox build. :X
Not hard to see. Go to IGN, look at all the shots they have on the Xbox page, then look at the "new" shots on IGN Wii. The character design of the female character is glaringly downgraded (looks a lot more blocky and uglier), and most of the screens posted in this thread and the other thread that people were claiming looked impressive were actually old shots from the Xbox.Black-Wind said:Well lets pair up some Pics. . .cause from what I see thats not the case.
didn't want to be the one to post it, but yeah; not only is the trailer old, but most, if not all, of the pics in this thread are as well.FoneBone said:The trailer isn't actually new.. In fact, I'm unclear what, if any, of the media is actually from the Wii game.
Supposedly the IGN shots that have the word "Core" watermarked in the upper corner (why it's spelled differently I don't know) are the only "Wii" shots.Threi said:didn't want to be the one to post it, but yeah; not only is the trailer old, but most, if not all, of the pics in this thread are as well.
Hence why i find it strange for someone to claim that it looks "worse" than the XBOX build: it IS the XBOX build.
The problem is, most of the XBox stuff on IGN wasn't in-game (concept art).M74 said:Not hard to see. Go to IGN, look at all the shots they have on the Xbox page, then look at the "new" shots on IGN Wii. The character design of the female character is glaringly downgraded (looks a lot more blocky and uglier), and most of the screens posted in this thread and the other thread that people were claiming looked impressive were actually old shots from the Xbox.
AH now i see it.M74 said:Supposedly the IGN shots that have the word "Core" watermarked in the upper corner (why it's spelled differently I don't know) are the only "Wii" shots.
But maybe that's wrong. This was being discussed on some other forums I frequent.
The problem is, most of the XBox stuff on IGN wasn't in-game (concept art).
Seeing as we are looking at only IGN stuff that here some of IGN's stuff for the Wii ate those screens but theres others that weren't on the Xbox area that looks very much in place and onpar.
(Which is why I asked for some pic pairing and not just "go to IGN").
Then you can go look at the other Kore thread from a day or two ago on this very forum, where those pairings already took place.Black-Wind said:The problem is, most of the XBox stuff on IGN wasn't in-game (concept art).
Seeing as we are looking at only IGN stuff that here some of IGN's stuff for the Wii ate those screens but theres others that weren't on the Xbox area that looks very much in place and onpar.
(Which is why I asked for some pic pairing and not just "go to IGN").
M74 said:Supposedly the IGN shots that have the word "Core" watermarked in the upper corner (why it's spelled differently I don't know) are the only "Wii" shots.
But maybe that's wrong. This was being discussed on some other forums I frequent.
Really? Because I'm not the only one who sees it. *rolls eyes* Look above, and look in the other thread. Damn.Puncture said:That "looks worse than an Xbox/PS2" crap is played out anyway, and its thrown out there on EVERY game thats mutli plat for the Wii. This time it was just thrown out prematurely when we apparently dont even have Wii screens yet. Just shows how quick people are to pull that trigger.
Wow, they really fucked up the character design even more so than the Xbox version.M74 said:Then you can go look at the other Kore thread from a day or two ago on this very forum, where those pairings already took place.
Which also brings up the question, why do we have two threads?
Who cares?And full disclosure: The Wii is my only only system this gen and I have always been an avid Nintendo player.
Same here. I was getting a real B-K vibe from it.iosef said:The world, music, and overall feel greatly remind me of Banjo-Kazooie. This game will be purchased by me.