Trogdor1123
Member
replace my furnace or get this….
I already know this. Who are you trying to convince? Can you say it without tears in your eyes next time?Grow up, neither AMD nor Intel give a crap about you.
Name checks out.Kind of interested myself.
German: heiß, adjective, English: hot
I bet it will smoke it…Will a 420 AIO be enough?
14900KS “Arizona Lake”
Intel... WTH
Turn on eco mode, thank me later. 7600xThe CPU market is a disaster. You either go Intel and need a thermonuclear reactor just to power your PC while gaming, or you go AMD and have massively increased idle power draw compared to Intel. My 7950x3D at idle draws almost 30w more than my Intel rig does when just browsing the web and watching streams. It's not 400w, but the amount of time my PC is doing light work and sucking down a lot more power probably makes up for it. Not to mention this shit is super flaky, I've had 3 freaking burnt CPU memory controllers already and had to RMA my motherboard and CPU twice already. This last pair I'm just gonna run into the ground and when I swap them out I'm done with these CPUs. Problem is, where do I go because 400w house fire CPUs isn't it. What a mess.
Liquid Nitrogen may not be enough here. You will have to go liquid Helium!Name checks out
Kind of interested myself.
Power draw doesn’t concern me being on full solar curious if heat can be contained
Does Germany have the 240 volt plugs? You get more power to the plug.With the horrendous electricity prices in Germany, it is unaffordable or you will immediately become privately bankrupt
Turn on eco mode, thank me later. 7600x
CPU draw =/= Full System Draw at idle
Doesn't sound right, gaming workload shouldn't be that high, get a contact frame and a high quality thermal paste and try again.Honestly regert getting my 13900k. Shit always hits dam near 100c when gaming at 4k 120hz. Sometimes it even crashes my games because the software doesn't reconcile the thermal throttling.
I went in and undervolted it and basically turned it into a 12900k performance wise to get the temps down.
This is with a 360MM AIO water system too.
What do you mean by contained? Any heat generated will end up in your room (unless you have a water cool loop that has a tube leading to a heat exchanger outside your house).Name checks out
Kind of interested myself.
Power draw doesn’t concern me being on full solar curious if heat can be contained
Ive repasted it many times with various highly regarded pastes and same. 13 series just run hot. I limited TPD to 200w and that helped but im hitting power limits instead of thermal.Doesn't sound right, gaming workload shouldn't be that high, get a contact frame and a high quality thermal paste and try again.
Intel Core i9-14900KS Limited Edition CPU Leak: Up To 6.2 GHz Clock, Over 100C Temps & 400W+ Power Consumption
Intel's upcoming flagship Core i9-14900KS Limited Edition CPU has leaked out within OCCT and it's an insane beast in all regards.wccftech.com
gtx480 + plasma + upstairs bedroom in summer = hellThis + a 4090. Have fun in the summer.
It says 125w in your screenshot, help me understand. I am interested in a new computer soon.
Considering that the regular 14900K already draws >410W... I think we'll see even bigger figures in the final product.
Originally, with its metal heat spreader still on, the processor reached speeds up to 5.90 GHz during a test using Cinebench 2024, consuming a lot of power (376 watts) as reported by the computer's motherboard, and getting quite hot at 85°C. This was all while using a special cooling system called a Deepcool LS720 SE 360 mm AIO CLC. When Pakhtunov removed the metal cover and ran the same test, the processor didn't get as hot, reaching only 75°C, and it used slightly less power, drawing 366 watts.
He also ran another demanding test called Y-cruncher. With the metal cover on, the processor's speed boosted to 5.90 GHz, used even more power (432 watts), and got up to 89°C. After removing the cover, it cooled down a bit to 82°C and used less power at 409 watts. It's important to note that when the metal cover was off, Pakhtunov applied a special liquid-metal thermal material directly on the processor, which helped with the cooling. This testing shows that removing the metal cover from the processor can help it run cooler and use less power during intense tasks, thanks to better heat transfer between the processor and the cooling system.
well u should FO with that CoD anywaysI get pissed off if my 7950x 3d reach 70 degrees doing shaders in call of duty.
They can fuck off with that shit.
Yeah I stopped playing it. I don't know why all the sudden after MS bought them I got allergicwell
well u should FO with that CoD anyways
I mocked AMD to hell and back when they claimed their new chipsets were "fine" at 95°C.Is that all AMD fanboys have now? Oh intel is too hot, no likey?
I mean, is being hot causing issues for either camp? I think we are experiencing the limitations of Ohms law on x86. Until they start making chips differently, heat will always come into play.I mocked AMD to hell and back when they claimed their new chipsets were "fine" at 95°C.
I see no reason to do otherwise now that it's Intel.