• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Led Zeppelin Loses First Round in 'Stairway to Heaven' Lawsuit

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dalek

Member
Led Zeppelin Loses First Round in 'Stairway to Heaven' Lawsuit

2602919-led-zeppelin.jpg


Led Zeppelin is stuck in Pennsylvania at the moment, forced to confront claims the band stole its biggest hit "Stairway to Heaven" from Randy Craig Wolfe, founding member of the band Spirit.

Wolfe's heirs sued Led Zeppelin, Jimmy Page, Robert Plant and their music companies in June, asserting that the story Page has told over the years about holing himself up in a remote cottage in Wales in 1970 and creating the iconic song is false. The plaintiff alleges that the music really came from Spirit, which once toured with Led Zeppelin in the late 1960s.

In reaction to the lawsuit, the defendants challenged jurisdiction.

"The individual defendants are British citizens residing in England, own no property in Pennsylvania and have no contacts with Pennsylvania, let alone ties sufficient to render them essentially at home here," stated a memorandum to dismiss.

In response, the plaintiff amended the lawsuit with some emphasis on why a Pennsylvania judge should oversee the case: "Defendants are subject to specific jurisdiction in this district because they make millions of dollars from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania by directly targeting this district for the exploitation of 'Stairway to Heaven' through CD sales, digital downloading, radio and television play, advertising, marketing, concert performances, other performances, licensing, and otherwise targeting resident individuals and businesses to profit off the exploitation of 'Stairway to Heaven.'”

U.S. District Court Judge Juan Sánchez has now denied the motion to dismiss or transfer without prejudice, meaning that the Zeppelin parties can still try again.

The judge didn't offer any reasoning in his written order, but those looking for the standards by which judges determine jurisdiction can read about another judge's recent decision to throw out a trademark lawsuit filed by John Wayne's heirs against Duke University.

Here's a comparison of the two songs-first is "Taurus" by Sprit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJUdnTKlP1E#t=80

And the famous "Stairway to Heaven"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pPvNqOb6RA

I first heard of the controversy surrounding Led Zeppelin's supposed rip-offs back on this Howard Stern show segment where they interviewed someone regarding it and they played many shocking similarities-unfortunately this is part 2 of the segment, part 1 seems to be blocked: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cdr8PtUPIPo
 
Led Zeppelin Loses First Round in 'Stairway to Heaven' Lawsuit

2602919-led-zeppelin.jpg




Here's a comparison of the two songs-first is "Taurus" by Sprit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJUdnTKlP1E#t=80

And the famous "Stairway to Heaven"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pPvNqOb6RA

I first heard of the controversy surrounding Led Zeppelin's supposed rip-offs back on this Howard Stern show segment where they interviewed someone regarding it and they played many shocking similarities-unfortunately this is part 2 of the segment, part 1 seems to be blocked: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cdr8PtUPIPo

obviously the progression/riff sounds very similar (if not identical) but is that the whole song by Spirit? so they're saying a PORTION of stairway to heaven was stolen? also, what is the statute of limitations on something like this? hard to imagine that the heirs of someone can file a lawsuit 40 years later or whatever it is

not really surprising though. led zep "borrowed" plenty!
 
You can't copyright chord progressions, and for a melody to be considered stolen there has to be 5 or more identical notes. None of those things are being broken. Plus, I would argue that guitar lick isn't a melody in the Spirit song, just a chord outline, and when they compare songs in court I believe they compare the main melody or hook from each song. Just because your song happens to be the same tempo and key with the same chord progression doesn't make it plagiarism, there are a thousand songs that meet this same criteria
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Statute of Limitations, no?

For the record, a jurisdictional motion has NOTHING to do with any of the merits of the case at all. Zero, zilch, nada.
 
The "first round" that they lost is a venue change? That's not that fatal to their position.

Also, I'm not a music scholar qualified to testify on such matters, but there's no way I'd confuse the first song you linked with the second (and vice versa.) Maybe a few note combinations ("measures," right?), but nothing like a whole stealing of the song.
 

Altazor

Member
They haven't lost anything yet. The only thing being "discussed" right now is if that Pennsylvania Court has jurisdiction over the matter or not.

Wolfe: I'm suing you at this court, LZ, cuz you ripped my song off.
LZ: We're british, we don't have any property in Pennsylvania, the "case" is irrelevant for this court.
Wolfe: but your reissues have been sold in Pennsylvania, you're targetting Pennsylvania residents and you're profiting from it. This court can oversee this.
Court: Yes, we can.
 

TheZink

Member
You can't copyright chord progressions, and for a melody to be considered stolen there has to be 5 or more identical notes. None of those things are being broken. Plus, I would argue that guitar lick isn't a melody in the Spirit song, just a chord outline, and when they compare songs in court I believe they compare the main melody or hook from each song. Just because your song happens to be the same tempo and key with the same chord progression doesn't make it plagiarism, there are a thousand songs that meet this same criteria
This guy is correct. I'm a musician by trade. That's is a typical walk down. There are thousands of songs that use the same walk. It just happens that these sound similar.
 

GorillaJu

Member
This guy is correct. I'm a musician by trade. That's is a typical walk down. There are thousands of songs that use the same walk. It just happens that these sound similar.

Okay, I'm a musician and my co worker sitting next to me is as well, and we both don't buy this. It's far too coincidental, especially for a band that Zeppelin toured with, and after their history of stealing from other artists they know and/or toured with...

Doubt that they'll actually lose because it won't satisfy plagiarism laws but... Yeah.
 

TheZink

Member
Okay, I'm a musician and my co worker sitting next to me is as well, and we both don't buy this. It's far too coincidental, especially for a band that Zeppelin toured with, and after their history of stealing from other artists they know and/or toured with...

Doubt that they'll actually lose because it won't satisfy plagiarism laws but... Yeah.
I didn't read that they toured together. Just listened to the song. That probably makes more sence.
 

coleco

Member
While it's true you can't copyright chord progressions and that there's a significant change in the last chord used I have to say they not only copied the chords but also the general tone and atmosphere of the original song. It probably won't be enough to lose in court and led zepellin adds much more to the original with the voice, lyrics and different passages but it's an obvious plagium. These are not two different songs sharing chords but a transplanted passage built on.
 
While it's true you can't copyright chord progressions and that there's a significant change in the last chord used I have to say they not only copied the chords but also the general tone and atmosphere of the original song. It probably won't be enough to lose in court and led zepellin adds much more to the original with the voice, lyrics and different passages but it's an obvious plagium. These are not two different songs sharing chords but a transplanted passage built on.
I know music copyright is a complete clusterfuck, but I would find it hard to believe that "general tone and atmosphere" is anywhere close to being copyrightable.
 

Fuchsdh

Member
I dunno. Led Zeppelin certainly ripped off a lot of stuff from lesser acts, but this is not an egregious example, and doesn't even come close to a "My Sweet Lord" level of similarity, which is probably what you'd need for legal purposes.
 

Xun

Member
Maybe Page did "steal" it or maybe he subconsciously based it on the progression, but there's nothing that special musically about it in my opinion.

Similar progressions have been used long before Spirit "invented" it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom