Let's talk about catcalling

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've never done it. Almost crashed my car ogling a girl when I was a teenager once, but I'm not exactly proud of that. Looking back it is kinda insane.

I think it's actually kinda crazy anyone does this, but it's even crazier how people tend to do it in groups. Like, have you no shame for being a creep?
 
This type of harassment is death by a thousand cuts. I dont think anyone in this thread is saying these guys need to be arrested or have legal action taken against them.

This does not negate that all the times someone whistles at a women are harassment to the woman, because those whistles are the 12th or 20th or 100th time its happened to them.

Also men (and the patriarchy) is a group of people pushing this onto women.

I think the guys that actually harrass, the ones that follow and dont stop, need to be arrested.

My point is, is dangerous to call everything harrassment. It needs to have a clear definition, other than "if the person feels harrassed, she is". That does nothing to help bring people that actually harrass to justice.

And again, I am not saying guys should whistle, or shout compliments. These guys are idiots if thye think it does anything other than annoy women and repel them. My point is, If they dont take it one step further to actually cross that line, they are not harrassing, just being idiots.
 
I never catcall. I'm way too shy to even say hi most of the time to pretty girls.

If you were bolder, would you?


This is not about confidence. Catcalling is first and foremost about entitlement. It's about MY right to get your attention, MY right to judge you, MY right to ivade your personal space, MY right to treat you how I want. You are not taken into consideration because the only important thing is me, me, me, me, me.

Therefore the question, being shy is one thing, how you view others is another.
 
I never catcall. I'm way too shy to even say hi most of the time to pretty girls.

Like the other poster said, it's not about confidence. It's about insecurity actually. They are desperate to have power over someone, and thus catcall.
 
I've had a few interesting experiences with my girlfriend and people coming up to her or saying things from a distance. One in particular in Boston where a guy just got right in her face and said "beauuuutifulllllll". I also get a good deal of harrasment lol but from the people harrasing my gf. They'll hurl insults about her getting with a "real man", and stuff of the like. I mostly just ignore it, these people are looking for reactions.

Interestingly enough I have 2 friends who girls often come up to and tell them they're gorgeous. One girl came up to my friend walking a boardwalk one night and grabbed his face, told him she was in love with him.
 
Like the other poster said, it's not about confidence. It's about insecurity actually. They are desperate to have power over someone, and thus catcall.

I dont want to make assumptions about that poster but I think sometimes young people get mixed messages.

In my late teens I would go to parties with these alpha private school dudes. They would always "hook up" and have girlfriends and stuff. Very attractive girls. I had grown out of my utterly socially inept phase, but I was faking it till i made it I still had massive self esteem issues and was terribly lonely.

Id see these guys being so pushy and boorish with these girls, and they would seemingly eat it up. One guy, the biggest dick of them all, had like a cadre of girls obsessed with him.

Luckily I was raises in a house where I was taught very well that women deserve my respect so I would find myself thinking

"I wish these girls were talking to me and interested in me, based on what I bring to the table"

But i can certainly see someone as lonely as I was and not brought up in the same enviornmenrt saying

"I wish I could act like those guys, they must never be lonely"
 
I met girls who have very low charisma (what's considered ugly in layman's terms) and self esteem and i'm sure they wouldn't mind if they felt desired once in a while.
Physical attractiveness and charisma are linked, but not actually the same thing.
I know that's not the point of this thread, but I just wanted to point that out.

If people who already feel self-conscious or think they're unattractive get catcalled they'll often feel like they're being mocked.
Sometimes that will be the whole point.

Even if that's not the case it's not really a complement to hear that someone wants to fuck you.
So you are saying if catcalling happens only once in a while, it's OK?
It never just happens once in a while. It happens constantly. Maybe the one time it happened to you, you liked it. Now picture that happening constantly.
A constant stream of lewd comments and sexually uncomfortable situations being levied at you by people you don't know who only have interest in you as a target of their garbage.
You would get sick of it really fast.

You say you're shy and introverted. A whole load of people getting up in your business should be your idea of hell.
Also i'm talking about catcalling. This comic looks like something too extreme.
"something too extreme"? That's catcalling.
You know, the thing you were rushing to defend. So do you mean that actually you realise it is a problem?
But this thread does seem to imply that a whistle or car horn is the same as someone putting you in a corner telling you that he wants to "fuck you in the mouth"? Is that correct?
Clearly not.

There's a spectrum of catcalling. All of it can and does happen.
And it's not a "once in a while" thing, it's an ongoing storm of unwanted noise. So, frankly, even if someone might not be blunt enough to say "I want to fuck you in the mouth" at some point that's going to be what you're hearing anyway.

I will admit that I've never actually heard someone bluntly state "I want to fuck you in the mouth" but I wouldn't be at all surprised to find people have.
I've heard "You need a good fucking" and "You won't be such a bitch when I'm done with you", after all.
Now if people have their days ruined and feel terrible because someone whistle on them on the road, instead of passing it like something rude that happens from time to time, this i didn't know. I'm sorry if i patronized anyone.
The tone of this is all wrong "Well I didn't know that people have their days ruined because they don't just ignore people acting like prats"
People shouldn't have to ignore garbage being thrown at them.
But again, the real problem is that it isn't something that happens from time to time.

It wears you down.

Like I said in my original post, there are nuances. Someone said that whistling is harrassment, if the person that got whisteled to feels harrassed. This has no legal basis.

If a guy whistles, or makes a passing remark, in my opinion based on the legal definition of harassment, it is not harrassment. Now, if the same guy whistles, then proceeds to follow or continues making clearly unwanted remarks to the woman, htat is clear harrassment.

Failing to recognze this difference does nothing to help with the problem, in my view.
My point is, is dangerous to call everything harrassment. It needs to have a clear definition, other than "if the person feels harrassed, she is". That does nothing to help bring people that actually harrass to justice.

And again, I am not saying guys should whistle, or shout compliments. These guys are idiots if thye think it does anything other than annoy women and repel them. My point is, If they dont take it one step further to actually cross that line, they are not harrassing, just being idiots.
And you seem to think that it only becomes harassment if the perpetrator is the same person.

To dispute that, I'm going to quote your definition of harassment back at you, with different bolding for emphasis.

harassment
(either harris-meant or huh-rass-meant) n. the act of systematic and/or continued unwanted and annoying actions of one party or a group, including threats and demands. The purposes may vary, including racial prejudice, personal malice, an attempt to force someone to quit a job or grant sexual favors, apply illegal pressure to collect a bill, or merely gain sadistic pleasure from making someone fearful or anxious.
Whistling in the catcalling sense is a continued unwanted or annoying action.
The party or group is not each individual man who catcalls. The party or group is all of them, together, as a collective of "men who catcall"
The actions being perpetrated by all of them add up to become continued unwanted and annoying actions which is, by definition, harassment.

And no, they do not have to take that harassment "further" for it to become "real harassment", that's just crass.

(Though no, you couldn't actually take the collective group of 'men who catcall' to court and prosecute them over it).
 
I dont want to make assumptions about that poster but I think sometimes young people get mixed messages.
[...]

It's not only young people. It's very common to mix confidence with brashness or egocentrism with high self esteem, and concurrently introversion with low self esteem or social anxiety. For uninitiated outsiders these things might look the same on surface level and even for someone more knowledgeable it's sometimes very hard to distinguish them.

An easy target on this front is the PUA community. During its popularity peak few years ago people even on GAF were defending it by saying things like: "what harm is there if it makes people more confident?" It's the same with brash behaviour - it's not confidence, it's faking confidence.
 
And you seem to think that it only becomes harassment if the perpetrator is the same person.

To dispute that, I'm going to quote your definition of harassment back at you, with different bolding for emphasis.


Whistling in the catcalling sense is a continued unwanted or annoying action.
The party or group is not each individual man who catcalls. The party or group is all of them, together, as a collective of "men who catcall"
The actions being perpetrated by all of them add up to become continued unwanted and annoying actions which is, by definition, harassment.

And no, they do not have to take that harassment "further" for it to become "real harassment", that's just crass.

(Though no, you couldn't actually take the collective group of 'men who catcall' to court and prosecute them over it).

Legally, yes, it only becomes harrassement if the same perpetrator does it. I dont seem to think it. Its the legal term for it. I just happen to agree.

well, you made my point for me there in the end. Legally, your opinion of whistling constituting harrassement is wrong. And it illustrates why I think that the legal definition is correct, if you assume anyone who ever stupidly tries to get the attention of a woman is harrassing her, then the vast majority of men, your dad, brothers, cousins, co workers, are all harrassers, or were one at some point in hteir lives. There would be no place for nuance, and define acions we could all do to curtail this practice. Its clear how to educate assholes who follow and harrass, call the cops on them. Help the woman. I pretended to be the boyfriend of a frind of mine once, because 3 guys where catcalling and then started asking if we were together, following us, etc.

Now you want to put these guys in the same category. ok, waht can we do if we see a guy whistling to a woman on the street? shame him? if I see it and I dont, am I a harrassement enabler?

Also, I would appretiate if you dont assign things I never said to me. I never said harrassement becomes "real"after taking things further. I said it becomes illegal. It becomes the legal definition of harrassement. If a woman feels harrassed by a whistle, I dont have the power to tell her how she should feel. But its a fact she cannot legally act on it.
 
If you were bolder, would you?


This is not about confidence. Catcalling is first and foremost about entitlement. It's about MY right to get your attention, MY right to judge you, MY right to ivade your personal space, MY right to treat you how I want. You are not taken into consideration because the only important thing is me, me, me, me, me.

Therefore the question, being shy is one thing, how you view others is another.

Nah. I wouldn't want my sister or girlfriend to be catcalled (nor would I want to be for that matter). It feels wrong for the reasons you mentioned.
 
It was really shocking the first time I became aware of how frequent (and the early age) women have to deal with harassment, I am surprised by the number of people who can't empathize with that situation, I mean imagine you constantly need to deflect attention towards something you have not control over by people twice your size and strength.

I will say I am not in complete agreement with the never approach someone outside a bar attitude, I mean small talks are a thing that can help you easily gauge interest (both your own and the other party), but I can see how people might object to it under the assumption that you are motivated solely by aesthetic.
 
I quoted myself to give context to this post.

Here is the legal definition of harrassment:

harassment
(either harris-meant or huh-rass-meant) n. the act of systematic and/or continued unwanted and annoying actions of one party or a group, including threats and demands. The purposes may vary, including racial prejudice, personal malice, an attempt to force someone to quit a job or grant sexual favors, apply illegal pressure to collect a bill, or merely gain sadistic pleasure from making someone fearful or anxious.


The bolded is the main point of alot of this thread. Like I said in my original post, there are nuances. Someone said that whistling is harrassment, if the person that got whisteled to feels harrassed. This has no legal basis.

If a guy whistles, or makes a passing remark, in my opinion based on the legal definition of harassment, it is not harrassment. Now, if the same guy whistles, then proceeds to follow or continues making clearly unwanted remarks to the woman, htat is clear harrassment.

Failing to recognze this difference does nothing to help with the problem, in my view.

Quoting definitions isn't a be-all and end-all to a discussion.

But sure, let's bite.

The definition I found says:

harassment
noun
noun: harassment; plural noun: harassments
aggressive pressure or intimidation.

Being catcalled in a street is definitely intimidating. It's unprovoked and feels like an overstepping of boundaries, like into your personal space. Wikipedia (hardly definitive - but a broader source) goes further and says

Harassment (/həˈræsmənt/ or /ˈhærəsmənt/) covers a wide range of behaviours of an offensive nature.

Catcalling is offensive. It is intimidating. Sometimes it is actively aggressive - indeed in many cultures unprovoked intimate communication is considered aggressive.

Besides the whole line of reasoning: who are you to say what's harassment or not? If you feel like you're being harassed, you're being harassed.
 
I think I have done it before(to both men and women).... but not to the degree that would make people feel uncomfortable(I'm not even sure if I'm confusing catcalling with genuine complimenting).

edit: Nevermind, what I've done is definitely not catcalling
 
Remember when people were like "ugghhh this thread is so pointless, it's just gonna be an echo chamber!"

Sweet summer children.

It's quite the contrary sadly.

There's a plethora of examples from women in this thread as to why this is harassment. And I've personally witness my sibling deal with harassment from as early as she was 17 (Probably earlier from her own personal experiences).


Yet people wanna still go "But why?"
 
Catcalling is wrong, but I'm glad my dad it or else I probably wouldn't be here lol

kvpaw_f-thumbnail-100-0_s-600x0.jpg
 
Quoting definitions isn't a be-all and end-all to a discussion.

But sure, let's bite.

The definition I found says:



Being catcalled in a street is definitely intimidating. It's unprovoked and feels like an overstepping of boundaries, like into your personal space. Wikipedia (hardly definitive - but a broader source) goes further and says



Catcalling is offensive. It is intimidating. Sometimes it is actively aggressive - indeed in many cultures unprovoked intimate communication is considered aggressive.

Besides the whole line of reasoning: who are you to say what's harassment or not? If you feel like you're being harassed, you're being harassed.

I adressed this on my response to another poster, but the only definition that matters to actually adress the issue is the legal definition, and that is what I gave. The rest are opinions and interpretations, that serve only individuals.
So I agree with you, quoting definitions does not end the discussion, and I never intended to do that, as I keep asking for opinions on some things I say because I think the conversation is important, but it also does not serve the conversation to quote ay definition. Its important to establish your view, sure, but it has no real impact in solving the issue. WHich I agree is something that needs to be reviewed and properly handled.

I also responded earlier that I have no power to say when someone feels harrassed or not. That is for each individual person. So I never claimed to have the end all be all definition of harrassement, and I never said people that feels harrassed are not in fact being harrassed.

My point, again, is that it doesnt matter if you feel harrassed, if the activity you perceive as harrassement does not comply to the legal definition for ay real repercussion to happen. You have every right to feel harrassed, even accuse someone of harassement, but you would still need to prove that person harrassed you following that legal definition for anything to happen. My perspective is I agree with the legal definition.
 
I never said people that feels harrassed are not in fact being harrassed.
I mean, the wording itself ("feels" harassed) implies that anyway, that's exactly what you're saying when you say stuff like this:
the only definition that matters to actually adress the issue is the legal definition, and that is what I gave. The rest are opinions and interpretations, that serve only individuals.
My point, again, is that it doesnt matter if you feel harrassed, if the activity you perceive as harrassement does not comply to the legal definition for ay real repercussion to happen.
My perspective is I agree with the legal definition.
You are telling people who have experienced harassment that in your opinion their experiences aren't real. It's... offputting.

But okay, if you like legal definitions so much, let's try looking at some others.

The Public Order Act of 1986.
Section 4A, Intentional harassment, alarm or distress
(1)A person is guilty of an offence if, with intent to cause a person harassment, alarm or distress, he—

(a)uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or

(b)displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, thereby causing that or another person harassment, alarm or distress.
Section 5, Harassment, alarm or distress
(1) A person is guilty of an offence if he:
(a) uses threatening [or abusive] words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or
(b) displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening [or abusive], within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby."
Before 2013 section 5 read "uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour" as well, they changed it to decriminalise insults (accidental insults? Anyway, insults are now only covered under Section 4, which requires intent).

The important thing to note here is that there is no need, under the Public Order Act, for the actions to have taken place more than once.

The only time you need it to have happened more than once is if you want to pursue a case under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (which is really aimed at stalkers, but whatever), where course of conduct is defined as "conduct on at least two occasions"
1. Prohibition of harassment. said:
(1)A person must not pursue a course of conduct—

(a)which amounts to harassment of another, and

(b)which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.

1. Prohibition of harassment. said:
(2)For the purposes of this section, the person whose course of conduct is in question ought to know that it amounts to harassment of another if a reasonable person in possession of the same information would think the course of conduct amounted to harassment of the other.
7. Interpretation of this group of sections said:
(2)References to harassing a person include alarming the person or causing the person distress.
7. Interpretation of this group of sections said:
(3)A "course of conduct" must involve—

(a)in the case of conduct in relation to a single person (see section 1(1)), conduct on at least two occasions in relation to that person, or

(b)in the case of conduct in relation to two or more persons (see section 1(1A)), conduct on at least one occasion in relation to each of those persons.]
7. Interpretation of this group of sections said:
(4)"Conduct" includes speech.

Blackstone's Guide to the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 has a fun example as well:
For example if A shouts obscenities at B one evening he commits an offence contrary to s5 Public Order Act 1986. If the behaviour is repeated the next evening then A has committed two offences contrary to s5 of the public order act and has also pursued a course of conduct contrary to s2 of the protection from harassment act. Theoretically therefore A could be charged with the two offences contrary to the public order act or with one offence of criminal harassment or with all three offences. There is no guidance in the Act as to which approach will be acceptable or preferred.
 
So, what percentage of women need to find catcalling disgusting and creepy before we can admit that maybe the behavior is unacceptable? Why are people clinging to the exceptions?

You're going to have to have men being punished for doing it, and men seeing others punished for doing it, before change happens. That's how it works.

It's hard for people to feel empathy for something that they will rarely, if ever experience. I'm a dude, who has only been catcalled by other men. I thought it was funny, and laughed it off. I didn't see it as harassment either, until my sisters explained how often it happens. Where it happens. Who it is that yells at them. I know how much it affects them, so I don't do it.

Many won't have that type of education.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom