evil solrac v3.0
Member
KidGalactus said:There is no correlation between these things. Why do you think there is?
you think 'cause you're the destroyer of worlds you can boss us around?
KidGalactus said:There is no correlation between these things. Why do you think there is?
They could have, it's quite possible. It's also possible that somewhere in Mexico around 66 million years ago, a civilisation of intelligent dinosaurs came about that was on the cusp of an industrial revolution, but was wiped out by a massive meteor right there. The arising of intelligent life on a planet likely follows a poisson distribution where k is 1 and lambda is the expected number of times intelligent life would arise in a given time period. The value of lambda here is the key. It could be as low as once in a billion years or as high as once in a trillion.Joates said:Doesnt your idea assume all life started at the same time/evolves at the same rate throughout the universe? Earth is what 4 or 5 billion yrs old but the universe is closer to 14 billion years old.. just saying other lifeforms could have had a head start (or a delay).
And out of morbid curiosity, why did Earth have to seed mars and not vice versa, or even the possibility of life forming independently on each?
Xeke said:I highly doubt there is intelligent life out there by our concept of intelligence. Our capacity for what we see as intelligence was devloped by one species on the planet because of a very specific set of evolutionary requirements and the chances of those same paramaters existing other places is slim.
Deku said:cross pollination between the planets is a pretty popular working theory for life at the moment.
viciouskillersquirrel said:Also, I'm of the opinion that Earth seeded Mars because it's the simplest explanation.
evil solrac v3.0 said:you think 'cause you're the destroyer of worlds you can boss us around?
abstract alien said:Everyone thinks it is so ridiculous for life outside of earth to be possible, and come to find out, it just might be on the very first planet we looked at :lol
Duh. If we get more information, my perspective will change.KidGalactus said:Isn't it only the simplest explanation from your current perspective?
Thaedolus said:That's quite the assumption, considering how fucking huge the universe is. In case you didn't know: it's really, really big.
Even if the odds were something like one in every billion galaxies had a planet with creatures of equal or greater intelligence than ours, we'd still be talking many, many civilizations existing out there. And something like this kinda points toward the odds being much more in the favor of intelligence existing in abundance.
we should send a jehovah's witness first just in case.liquid_gears said:But have they felt the love of Jesus?
Every lifeform is beautiful and unique.jett said:ITT: humans believe they're beautiful and unique snowflakes.
Thunder Monkey said:Every lifeform is beautiful and unique.
The human problems are pride, arrogance, and avarice. We aren't the pinnacle of evolution, we're just one of many ways life can evolve. We lucked out, what we lacked in physical strength, we made up for in cunning. We plot, plan, and deceive our way to victory.
But all life is unique. Evolution is a cool thing. We all have a basic beginning mix, and from that plant life, animal life, viruses, a whole range of lifeforms from the microbial to the mammoth spring forth.
What makes us unique on this planet is our ability to find calm in the chaos. Our drive to find simplicity in the universes complexities. For all we know a billion civilizations have risen and fallen in the span of time it took us to grasp the basics of our universe.
It's possible they have visited this area, but life with any semblance of intelligence is extremely short lived on this planet. And the universe is a very old, and large place. The likely hood of civilizations intersecting in this universe, of existing at the same time, is almost unlikely, and being anywhere close to one another?
If they can get here, then we have no defense against them. Because such a thing would take either an immortal race, or someone that can break what we understand as the laws of physics. Either scenario leaves humanity with the option of slaves or retarded friend.
My God is chaotic.Xeke said:What if humans in the future from far colonized reaches of the galaxy attack us here in the present because there is no double ply toilet paper in the future?
Where is your god now?
Duh. If we get more information, my perspective will change.
this gal isn't:Thunder Monkey said:Every lifeform is beautiful and unique.
eh... if you were to include mars into the golidlocks zone purely on its hypothetical ability to support conditions necessary for earth like life then an equal case could be made for extending that zone all the way out to europa, which would provide ample space to handily eliminate that 'downside'.OuterWorldVoice said:I agree, but the downside of that argument, is that it's a planet that exists in the same habitable band of a solar system already proven to be hospitable to life. Like, Earth 2.
KidGalactus said:Isn't it only the simplest explanation from your current perspective?
Yes.
That is what I think.
Monocle said:Awesome, I've been anticipating news like this since I learned of ALH84001.Clearly this is proof that the devil works in ways more cunning than we ever imagined.
Sir Fragula said:Hehe, didn't some conspiracy nut say Obama would introduce us to one or more alien species by the end of this year?
Excuse me sir, but a what?SnakeswithLasers said:biomorph = xenomorph?
Just speculating here:Jea Song said:The scientists that made anything that landed on mars had some kind of bacteria on their hands right? They had to touch rover,and opportunity. So technically, if the bacteria survived the trip, isnt there micobicrobial life on mars?
Xdrive05 said:Carl Sagan's ghost, floating out there in the Ether, just adjusted his turtle neck collar and cracked a smile.
beermonkey@tehbias said:Carl Sagan thought ghosts and Gods were for idiots.
XCell9200 said:*space shuttle*
Keyser Soze said:
"That's life? More like a great... soft... sissy... girlie... nancy... French... bender... Man United supporting POOF!!"
XCell9200 said:
Neanderthals also evolved intelligence, sure they come from the same ape evolutionary tree but its a nice indication that there is more than one intelligent species. Also with more than 99.9% of species that have existed already dead and most of their fossils completely turned to dust it is hard to make the assumption that we are the only species that have evolved intelligence.viciouskillersquirrel said:They could have, it's quite possible. It's also possible that somewhere in Mexico around 66 million years ago, a civilisation of intelligent dinosaurs came about that was on the cusp of an industrial revolution, but was wiped out by a massive meteor right there. The arising of intelligent life on a planet likely follows a poisson distribution where k is 1 and lambda is the expected number of times intelligent life would arise in a given time period. The value of lambda here is the key. It could be as low as once in a billion years or as high as once in a trillion.
Out of 3.5 billion years of life, we're the only life form to have achieved our level of intelligence. Nemotode worms, sharks, paramecia, stinging nettles, birds and cockroaches have had just as much time to evolve as we have and yet our level of intelligence has occurred only once. Don't think that natural selection is a force that pushes toward "higher" forms of life; rather, it is a force that pushes toward survival.
I'm making the point that from our experience, even where life is present and abundant, intelligence isn't common or inevitable.
Also, I'm of the opinion that Earth seeded Mars because it's the simplest explanation. We have plenty of life here and did so even before Mars's oceans dried up, so it stands to reason that this is the most likely explanation. Otherwise would be cool and exciting, but not nearly as likely
If you saw my earlier post, I took into account 4 million years of human evolution. Neanderthals fall into that time frame.PistolGrip said:Neanderthals also evolved intelligence, sure they come from the same ape evolutionary tree but its a nice indication that there is more than one intelligent species. Also with more than 99.9% of species that have existed already dead and most of their fossils completely turned to dust it is hard to make the assumption that we are the only species that have evolved intelligence.
Jea Song said:YUP. Also
The scientists that made anything that landed on mars had some kind of bacteria on their hands right? They had to touch rover,and opportunity. So technically, if the bacteria survived the trip, isnt there micobicrobial life on mars?
gofreak said:There was kind of talk about this recently based on seasonal methane output on Mars. There's two possible explanations for that - geological or biological. A lot of folks seemed to be leaning toward biological, but we cannot be absolutely certain yet.
But it is possible there still is life there, there are possible indirect pointers of it.
Scientists have ruled out the possibility that methane is delivered to Mars by meteorites, raising fresh hopes that the gas might be generated by life on the red planet, in research published tomorrow in Earth and Planetary Science Letters.
Messypandas said:
this is just the start
I was just on the same train of thought.jamesinclair said:You know what would be crazy?
If the great extinctions of the past were not caused by natural disasters....
BUT BY MARTIAN DISEASES!
Imagine, an asteroid lands on earth carrying bacteria from mars. A dinosaurpanda eats it and INFECTION TIME
You like to act butthurt all the time, don't you?ToxicAdam said:Any way we can blame the extinction of this species on Man yet?
I avoided this thread for so long because I thought the same thing. :lolJangaroo said:Is it weird that I was thinking about the tv show before clicking this thread?