The Primer guy actually consulted on Looper didn't he?
Possibly the biggest disappointment of the year for me.
His head is made of the same material as the sun.He must have been high as a kite while giving advice then.
I honestly thought this was going to be some sort of weird buddy cop/assassin movie with Willis and JGL, so I was pleasantly surprised.
I was way certain the kid was JGL's character in some way.
I was way certain the kid was JGL's character in some way.
There did seem to be hints of relationships between those two character pairs, especially Kid Blue and Abe. The comment Kid Blue made about just wanting to please Abe seemed to be very blatantly implying something.I was suspecting this, or at least they would have done some kind of reveal with Kid Blue that might either show that he was either Jeff Daniels' younger self, or some relative of Jeff Daniels. It would have made sense for this character because Jeff Daniels gave him such a hard time throughout the movie.
Jeff Daniels and Paul Dano both pretty well nailed their characters. I was less impressed by Emily Blunt and Noah Segan, but everyone did well enough.I was suspecting this, or at least they would have done some kind of reveal with Kid Blue that might either show that he was either Jeff Daniels' younger self, or some relative of Jeff Daniels. It would have made sense for this character because Jeff Daniels gave him such a hard time throughout the movie.
Paul Dano was really good in this, even though he had a minor role.
I was suspecting this, or at least they would have done some kind of reveal with Kid Blue that might either show that he was either Jeff Daniels' younger self, or some relative of Jeff Daniels. It would have made sense for this character because Jeff Daniels gave him such a hard time throughout the movie.
Paul Dano was really good in this, even though he had a minor role.
well he was in a vague sense, the next loop as it were.
Did anyone else have in your head a very clear picture of what the rainmaker must have been like in the un-changed future? mid-20s or early 30s... standard jacket and pants... knock on the front door of Gangster hideout/looper squat #1... door window slides open..
"Whattya want??"
insert silent scream and front of the building ripping apart.
My mind seriously ran away with this film in a good way .. not a pick apart way.
I have to say tho ... seeing many posts in this thread reminds me of watching this movie with my wife and having to pause the movie every 15 fucking minutes and explain something because it seems like half the audience for this film was playing facebook staring down at your phones instead of watching the movie.
-People not sure what was happening to old Seth as it happens RIGHT AFTER Young joe gives him up. Wtf.. they are obviously torturing/maiming him...
-Multiple timeline questions ... seemed obvious to me that they were showing you what Old Joes timeline went like the FIRST time through... the life he led to lead him back to try and find and kill the rainmaker. Not a third timeline or some such nonsense.
-Of fucking COURSE they can kill people in the future. It's just hard to do and not get caught. That's exactly what he fucking says IN THE MOVIE. Yes his wife was accidentally caught. No they don't have him tied up and shit because this is their contract. They agree to this shit and just as hardcore as the mob can be for letting your loop run i'm sure they are equally brutal about not being willing to close your contract properly.
-Hate on TK all you want... but they quite clearly outlined it's extent for use in their current
society... pretty straightforward and it ends up being a major fuckin piece of the pie.
could go on and on and on ... The missus actually got pretty pissed at me cause she was asking questions looking for clarification and I was sitting there explaining stuff in kind of an assholish manner because oh yah.. i'm trying to watch a fucking movie here. This feels like one of those movies that people go out of their way to overcomplicate and then complain about when a lot of the little things people are hanging up on seem ... to me... to be spelled out rather plainly in the fiction of the movie itself.
And yes...Pretty intense.the surgical mutilation shit was ... hard to watch. Honestly can't think of many other films that shown that shit to this extent.
Possibly the biggest disappointment of the year for me.
.
Also I like how in the future it's hard to get rid of a body or kill someone so let's kidnap Bruce Willis and send him back in time. Oh damn his wife watering the flowers outside startled me, better shoot this bitch then burn down the house. Why wouldn't you just kill Bruce Willis and leave his body there with her?
The wife's body thing has kinda become my personal test one for whether someone really even gave this movie a chance. Because if you were watching the movie even slightly open to liking it, you'd make the massively obvious and true connection that killing the wife was an accident, that agent would be in huge trouble for it, and it was a fucked up situation. And you'd understand why the basic premise of the film, that the time travel allows the kills to be untraceable, applies there because leaving one less body at the scene of a clusterfuck would obviously be preferableJust watched this.
Really enjoyed the first 2/3rds of the movie, absolutely hated the last. Or whenever they got to the farm I guess.
The TK thing was totally unnecessary. Lots of plot holes and stupid time travel shit.
Also I like how in the future it's hard to get rid of a body or kill someone so let's kidnap Bruce Willis and send him back in time. Oh damn his wife watering the flowers outside startled me, better shoot this bitch then burn down the house. Why wouldn't you just kill Bruce Willis and leave his body there with her?
Dude, the plot really falls apart the more you think things through, just accept it.
I just watched this movie and I have to say, if you wanted Bruce Willis to kill the kid you're the reason we have shootings like the one in Newton.
People who walk out of the movie working out the complexities of time travel and seriously consider the morality of whether or not you should kill a kid who you know will grow up to be the "next Hitler" are totally missing the point. The Time Travel plot is bullshit. Psychic powers are bullshit. But kids with uncontrollable tempers due to mental issues ARE a real issue, and many Americans believe the best way to handle these kids are to, short of killing them, locking them up for life because of future crimes they may/may not commit. And that's wrong, because it's that attitude which leads to horrible travesties.
Maybe this subtext stands out to me more after the Connecticut shooting, but I definitely think that was a central take-home message.
If you actually took the time to read through my post, I even pointed out the Time Travel and Psychic Powers stuff was all bullshit and didn't matter.
What I'm saying IS important is that, following the Connecticut shooting, there were people literally calling for kids with mental health issues, like Adam Lanza, to be locked up because they would obviously shoot up a school. And if you're cheering on Bruce Willis to kill a kid with obvious mental issues, you're literally feeding into that same paranoia. Sure, it's a movie, I understand that, but the fact there's people in real life who, if time travel was available, would go back in time and shoot 10-year old Adam Lanza is disgusting. Time Travel would LITERALLY provide a way to actively work to deter a person from crime, yet the first use most people would choose is to use it for murder.
If you actually took the time to read through my post, I even pointed out the Time Travel and Psychic Powers stuff was all bullshit and didn't matter.
What I'm saying IS important is that, following the Connecticut shooting, there were people literally calling for kids with mental health issues, like Adam Lanza, to be locked up because they would obviously shoot up a school. And if you're cheering on Bruce Willis to kill a kid with obvious mental issues, you're literally feeding into that same paranoia. Sure, it's a movie, I understand that, but the fact there's people in real life who, if time travel was available, would go back in time and shoot 10-year old Adam Lanza is disgusting. Time Travel would LITERALLY provide a way to actively work to deter a person from crime, yet the first use most people would choose is to use it for murder.
I just watched this movie and I have to say, if you wanted Bruce Willis to kill the kid you're the reason we have shootings like the one in Newton.
People who walk out of the movie working out the complexities of time travel and seriously consider the morality of whether or not you should kill a kid who you know will grow up to be the "next Hitler" are totally missing the point. The Time Travel plot is bullshit. Psychic powers are bullshit. But kids with uncontrollable tempers due to mental issues ARE a real issue, and many Americans believe the best way to handle these kids are to, short of killing them, locking them up for life because of future crimes they may/may not commit. And that's wrong, because it's that attitude which leads to horrible travesties.
Maybe this subtext stands out to me more after the Connecticut shooting, but I definitely think that was a central take-home message.
Dude, the plot really falls apart the more you think things through, just accept it.
Same with her boobies.Saw this movie last night, it was good, but not as great as I was hoping. For one, JGL looked silly as fuck. The people I watched it with kept pointing this out. The makeup was awful. It was really distracting. I did have a couple of questions:
-Maybe I missed something but when Bruce Willis first goes to the past, and then sees JGL behind the car and says something to the effect of "You dumbass" and then sees JGL on top of the fire escape before he falls, doesn't he drag his body away? Does he just put him somewhere for safe keeping? For a second this had me thinking there were 3 Joes all in the same time frame and left me a little confused.
-Does JGL end up going to Shanghai instead of France because of what Jeff Daniels told him?
On the bright side, Piper Perabo's ass was phenomenal.
but it really doesn't. the "plot holes" people keep bringing up are not plot holes in that they're either misreadings on that person's part (the wife dying) or simply elements of how time travel, a fictional device that is impossible that can work however the hell a writer wants it to work, just happens to work in this film.
also required reading: film crit hulk: plot holes and movie logic
Don't worry no one will cheering and remember character in mediocre movie.
The scene with young Joe shooting at old Joe in the diner with the other cronies really annoyed me.
One thing I noticed is that everyone seemed to disappear from the diner when that occurred.
Like, before, when they're talking, you see other people in the background. But then they're gone. Come to think of it, I don't recall anyone reacting to Old Joe suddenly yelling either.
One thing I noticed is that everyone seemed to disappear from the diner when that occurred.
Like, before, when they're talking, you see other people in the background. But then they're gone. Come to think of it, I don't recall anyone reacting to Old Joe suddenly yelling either.
I just watched this movie and I have to say, if you wanted Bruce Willis to kill the kid you're the reason we have shootings like the one in Newton.
If you write hyperbole bullshit on the internet, you're the reason for the Holocaust.