• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Looper (dir. Rian Johnson; Gordon-Levitt, Willis)

Status
Not open for further replies.
The kid was not a complete shit or a dick, I don't really even understand slinging insults like that about such young children. Seems short-sighted. Like, do you remember being a kid? At all?
He was precocious and prone to outbursts. He was also nice to Joe and Sara at times and wanted to do kind, smart things or do innocent stuff like play with toys. How in the fuck does that make a 5-year-old a douche? I'm imagining you guys seeing some kindergartener say something a little bit snarky and getting all hurt and sensitive. "Damn that kid is an asshole!" No, he's a kid.

The kid was a creepy little fucker
 
Solid movie.

Only part I didn't quite get was
when young Joe first lets old Joe escape, and then the whole scene repeats with him killing old Joe. Was that just showing what old Joe did when he was in young Joe's scenario?
 
Great movie. I don't really want to get bogged down in time travel "huh?" moments. Emily Blunt fucking killed it.

It was weird for me seeing her with the American accent, as I've just watched 2 movies in the past week with her doing her usual British accent.
 
It was weird for me seeing her with the American accent, as I've just watched 2 movies in the past week with her doing her usual British accent.

Her accent was sketchy at times. When she screams "NOOOO" at the end, it's really obvious she is British. And the rest of the movie she was switching between Southern accent and no accent at all.
 
I was actually pretty impressed with how similar they made JGL look to Willis. It was really apparent in one-on-one conversation scenes. I was thinking "Damn, he really looks like Bruce," the whole time. It's funny because I thought he looked awful in stills/commercials.
 
The eyebrows, man.

looper4112012.png
 
A million lols for the 30 year montage when they finally switched from JGL to Willis with that atrocious wig. Nope, sorry, not buying that JGL turns into Willis.
 
I was actually pretty impressed with how similar they made JGL look to Willis. It was really apparent in one-on-one conversation scenes. I was thinking "Damn, he really looks like Bruce," the whole time. It's funny because I thought he looked awful in stills/commercials.

Not at all. When they saw each other the first time, I kept saying to myself "fuck, how the hell does younger Joe recognize older Joe?"
 
Pretty good movie. I can nitpick it, but there's no fun in that.

What was the music in the first club scene? Tried looking it, but only get a Looper club in Florida as results.
 
My favorite subtle moment (at least if I was seeing it correctly):

Young Joe gets shot in the ear, Old Joe loses a chunk of his.

Some bits of the movie definitely reminded me of 12 Monkeys.
 
The diner scene showed the similiarities. It's mostly the nose
That scene made me kinda see why they did what they did with JGL's make up and prostethics. I mean, JGL still didn't look like a believable young Willis, but it would have been very weird to have them one in front of the other sporting different-shaped noses...
 
Great movie, but I agree with the folks that thought JGL looked goofy in the makeup/prosthetics. He doesn't look anything like Willis, so it was all for naught. I mean we know what young Willis looks like.

Circa Moonlighting:

86kRS.jpg
 
This is all I could think of for half the movie pertaining to JGL's face...

2277084-max_payne_face1.jpg


And I loved the movie. Would definitely see it again if one of my friend's wanted to.
 
I just got back from seeing this.

I want to let my thoughts gel before talking about what I liked and didn't like, but one thing I loved was the final shot fading out to black and silence for about 5 seconds until the credits started. I wonder if a different camera was used or if it was something added in post for that final shot. It was almost tilt-shift in effect.

I heard a few people in the audience let out groans that undoubtedly implied disappointment. I predict that being the general sentiment among most movie goers. I don't care.

I liked it, and I doubt going back and reading the posts in this thread probably tearing apart the movie for implausibilities will change my mind. The rules of time travel in movies are always fluid.

Probably my favorite time-travel movie since Primer, though for very different reasons.
 
I'm not going to nitpick some of the time paradox loopholes, cause it was otherwise an enjoyable movie.

But the 1st half of the movie was much better than the 2nd half. The only thing that made the 2nd half watchable was Emily Blunt. The 2nd half felt ike it was written by a completely different writer, or someone who had writer's block after the great diner scene between Willis and JGL, and wasn't sure where to go from there. Gone was the noir-like atmosphere of the first half with narrator voiceover, and in its place was some terrible Terminator-esque "save a mother and child from a future assassin" plot.

Movie would also have been better off without the telekinesis crap or the focus on that one dude who was hellbent on proving himself to Abe.
 
I saw the movie tonight. It was weird, and I could see the second half being oddly different. I'm not sure I liked it.

My favorite thing in the movie was probably the quote from the mob boss Abe, something like:
Look. I'm from the future. You want to go to China (rather than France).
I think that was the main thing people in the theater laughed at.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom