Buy. A. New. PC.GigaDrive said:I want LoTR Battle For Middle Earth 2 for Xenon, Revolution and PS3....that or a heavily beefed up, 60fps version of this first one.
Mr Gump said:I can sense the multiplayer will suck. There is barely any aspect of economy in this game. Its meant to be just pick up and play.
Educated guess from all interviews and media.Bregor said:Where do you get that from? Just because they did not demonstrate it in this video does not mean it isn't there.
Yeah, but WarCraft 3 at least offered tons of freedom to the players while judging from this LOTR movie, there is no freedom at all. I want to be able to build up my own armies of orcs or men and kick butt. I don't want to be given a certain amount of orcs/men and have no abilities to reproduce them. Also, look at that Balrag and trolls, the men were doing nothing but quivering when going against them. There has to be ways to counter those monsters or this game is very unbalanced.cuccoo said:I think the game economy means little about online success. Its all about the backbone structure of the online hub and developer support. I mean WC3 wasnt exactly the greatest RTS when it was released but Blizzard keep releasing patch for improvement and the whole battle.net thing really helps the online community as oppose to the shitty online hub that Generals had.
Buy. A. New. PC.
GigaDrive said:I have a new PC.
that still doesnt change anything. I still want a more refined version on the nextgen consoles. with more geometry and 60fps. consoles are always better in that they are a fixed platform which developers can push as hard as they can. untrue of PC. EA could never target only 3 Ghz CPU and newest graphics cards. but they CAN target whatever a console has. ok mini rant over.