M. Night talks about his Last Airbender movie

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you're a person who laments the decline of the Saturday morning kids cartoon genre, then you should really check out Avatar: The Last Airbender. It may not currently be on TV (we've not been getting up early), but it's available on DVD and it's properly brilliant; beautifully animated and very well written for kids' entertainment. M Night Shyamalan is currently in pre-production adapting the cartoon into a movie trilogy, so now is really the time to get yourself familiar with it.

We chatted with Shyamalan recently and he filled us in on a few details of the movie. For those who don't know the show, he explains the plot thusly:

"The actual plot is in a place where there are four tribes of people. And these people each have people within their tribe that have mastery over one element: water, earth, fire or air. They all live in a balance and harmony and once every generation there is born an individual who can bend – that is manipulate – all four of those elements and thereby keep a balance between all. They are kind of a Buddha figure to some extent. The story is about how, in this particular time, this avatar is born into the airbenders and disappears. Then all hell breaks loose and the fire nation basically commits genocide and eradicates the air tribe in the hopes of killing the avatar and taking over control of everything. This child then re-emerges, which is the beginning of our story. He reappears having been frozen in the ice — there is a whole story about how that happens — a hundred years later and this world is all fucked up and he is the last airbender, but he doesn’t want this job. He’s forced into the position of putting the world back together again. It actually has a lot of Shakespearean overtones to it. There’s lots of family angst, and fathers denying sons in different storylines."

That all clear? Short version is, there's a small boy called Aang who has the potential to control all the elements and everyone wants to capture him. Shyamalan says it was the mythology and philosophy inherent in the story that attracted him to it.

"Buddhist and Hindu philosophies run through the stuff," he continues. "When I realised that is what it was, it really drew me as the template for putting storytelling on a new level. There is a kind of thread that connects Star Wars and The Matrix – the first one. That same thread is in this story, about a forgotten belief system, or the illusion of the world now."

Of course, philosophy doesn't necessarily guarantee bums on seats. But this is a film that has a great deal of potential for incredible spectacle. The most powerful of the element benders can do great things with their powers, like controlling a raging river or manipulating walls of flame. Done right, this should have some incredible action.

"Obviously [there will be] some breathtaking visual effects," the director says. "Just imagine if you saw a little girl bending water out of a glass into the air as an extension of her own personal discipline. It’s three movies about the hero learning three elements. Live action".

But, equally, Shyamalan doesn't want the film, which he says will shoot on stages in Philadelphia, as well as locations including Greenland, to simply be an excuse for empty spectacle. He also acknowledges that this is a long way from anything he's done before. It's got the philosophical elements he likes, but it's also painting on a much larger canvas than any of his other films and speaking to a younger audience.

"It’s daunting on the level of not doing it properly," he admits. "It can’t be special effects for the sake of special effects, it has to be [that you use] take seven because the girl breathes properly on take seven. I have to tell the animators that. Everything, has to have that detail. I can’t leave it. I have to make sure that I make it the same kind of storytelling, but with just one more tool."

Like we say, this is very different to anything Shyamalan's done before, but we can really see him making this work. Whether you like all his movies or not, you can't deny the man is blessed with a lot of imagination. And that's exactly what a project like this needs – someone who can wrestle the multiple ideas of the show into a simple, coherent and visually amazing film. This should, and hopefully will be, fantastic.

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=22380
 
At the end of the trilogy, it pans out to reveal that the cartoon characters have been watching it the entire time. What a twist!
 
Scullibundo said:
Night has three.
That's debatable, and even if granted then none of them were recent and it's pretty clear that he's been on one hell of a downwards spiral lately.
 
Zeed said:
That's debatable, and even if granted then none of them were recent and it's pretty clear that he's been on a downwards spiral lately.

His only remotely decent film was Unbreakable... and even that had some extremely significant flaws. It's not exactly a brilliantly written film. Sixth Sense may be interesting to those who are color blind to preschool level foreshadowing.
 
PhoenixDark said:
Why the hyperbolic hate? M Night is a good director. He struggles when it comes to writing

too bad his movies almost entirely rest upon the script's strenght..which is why he's considered an overrated hack and suckalicious guy by some of us
 
PhoenixDark said:
Why the hyperbolic hate? M Night is a good director. He struggles when it comes to writing

Too bad he's also writing this then.

Has he actually bamboozled a studio into giving him money to develop this yet?
 
sounds interesting.

sounds actually like a RPG game i may have played. hopefully he does it right. im a fan of his style even if not all his movies turned to be great.
 
jett said:
Too bad he's also writing this then.

All his other work has been original, this is an adaptation from a strong source material. It would take a lot of effort to fuck it up entirely.
I'm not one of the hyperbolic Shyamalan haters, I think he's made some genuinely good films (and genuinely bad ones). I have a lot of faith that this will turn out quite good.
 
The cartoon is actually really good. Shyamalan got in trouble with some filmgoers for two reasons -- first, because he felt he had to keep up his reputation to have a huge twist in every movie, and that's all people ended up looking for (and reviling no matter what). Second, Lady in the Water.

I actually like all of his movies except for Lady in the Water. The nice thing about Shyamalan doing Airbender is that it's not his concept and that nobody's going to expect a huge plot twist. He has a great eye for cinematography and gets good performances out of his cast. So this could be a good trilogy.
 
Can he do action scenes? Doesn't seem like an actiony director. I've only seen parts of Signs and The Village and the closest to action was
when that blind girl was being chased by the crazy guy in the monster costume.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom