Guilty_AI
Gold Member
They shouldn't either, especially if it involves travelling halfway across the world.Many other old and obese people appear in court, why should he be given special treatment?
Last edited:
They shouldn't either, especially if it involves travelling halfway across the world.Many other old and obese people appear in court, why should he be given special treatment?
But when I asked Valve about this plan, they replied that they would remove Overgrowth from Steam if I allowed it to be sold at a lower price anywhere, even from my own website without Steam keys and without Steam’s DRM.
There's even more if you read the comments:I am reading this blog by the wolfire guy:
Regarding the Valve class action - Wolfire Games Blog
Dear gamers and game developers, I would like to explain why Wolfire Games is seeking to represent game developers in a class action suit against Valve Corporation. I felt that I had no choice, because I believe gamers and game developers are being harmed by Valve's conduct. While I am ...blog.wolfire.com
Seems like it all hinges on
I find this claim really hard to believe considering Valve does not even seem to enforce this for games sold via steam keys, hence there being games sold cheaper than on steam on other shops, pretty much constantly, even with steam keys.
Your whole case sits on the following claim:
"But when I asked Valve about this plan, they replied that they would remove Overgrowth from Steam if I allowed it to be sold at a lower price anywhere, even from my own website without Steam keys and without Steam’s DRM"
Can you elaborate on who exactly is this mysterious "they"? In what way did you communicate and with whom? Why is this vital information missing from the lawsuit?
I'm asking this because when communicating with in the past, I got the exact opposite response - that their parity terms only apply to 3rd party sales distributing their Steamworks keys, and that's reasonable because they don't charge commission for them.
This is also what the Steam distribution agreement itself specifies, and what countless other real-life cases demonstrate (Indie Gala transitioned to DRM-free giveaways of games that are also available on Steam a for a few years now). So to me it sounds like you either misunderstood the answer you got, "they" misunderstood your question, or you spoke with someone on no actual authority to tell you that.
I´m a twat becasue I have a different opinion and I explain why?
Is NeoGAF Resetera now where wrongthink is not allowed?
Of course I did, as you just repeated Valve´s claims that arent reflected in their contracts - but you would know that if you had seen those!
And if you didnt, you just talk out of your ass and not based on facts!
7$ on Steam
17.60$ on GOG - clearly cheaper!
If you would have bothered to read the thread, you would have realized it has nothing to do with feelings at all.
And what you believe or not believe is not my concern. I´m not the one on trial here!
Price parity is outside the steam store like PS store but they are talking about within the steam environment and PSN environment. Their grievance seems to be with steam keys so within that environment but outside of that store, much like PSN digital keys sold outside the PS store but within the PSN environment. I don't think they are going to win but this is part of their argument :The thing is, the re-opening of this case isn't over Valve's control within their store, but that allegedly they were trying to control prices outside the Steam enviroment, which is what the dev has to prove now as the 'evidence' they previously brought wasn't enough to confirm such practices were in place.
"Removing all doubts about its policing power, Valve also 'reserves the right' to 'deny keys' or 'revoke key requesting privileges' if they 'disadvantage' 'Steam customers'," the lawsuit read. "And while this language is couched in terms of protecting 'Steam customers,' this is a charade. Those customers are the same ones that can (and do) purchase Steam Keys on other storefronts besides the Steam Store. They are harmed when they cannot find games for lower prices elsewhere because Valve has restrained price competition through its Price Parity Provision.
Yeah, but that part of the lawsuit the dev already lost. For the new lawsuit the judge is going to focus on the supposed forced price-parity involving non-steam games.Price parity is outside the steam store like PS store but they are talking about within the steam environment and PSN environment. Their grievance seems to be with steam keys so within that environment but outside of that store, much like PSN digital keys sold outside the PS store but within the PSN environment. I don't think they are going to win but this is part of their argument :
I released games on Steam - so I did see it, but I cant say for sure if it was changed.
But I can say that the lawsuit would have been thrown out if there was really nothing to it.
I find this claim really hard to believe considering Valve does not even seem to enforce this for games sold via steam keys, hence there being games sold cheaper than on steam on other shops, pretty much constantly, even with steam keys.
7$ on Steam
17.60$ on GOG - clearly cheaper!
If we are gonna do this lets at least get our data right.Oh and you think Valve wouldnt be able to do all that with only a 20% share?
They have hundreds of billions in the bank!
Not even that is the whole story, since Valve lets developers generate steam keys and sell them outside of Steam, and Valve gets 0% from those while still paying for the steam infrastructure these games are using."Steam: Steam takes 30 percent of all sales made until the first $10 million. That cut becomes 25 percent when a developer sells between $10 million and $50 million. For every sale after the first $50 million, Steam only takes a 20 percent cut."
That is not even remotely close to the definition of a monopoly.Epic only wants 12%
He is, when Steam is the market! Steam has over 75% market share, which is the defiintion of a monopoly.
That is not even remotely close to the definition of a monopoly.
WTF??? Having to go to the courthouse = getting scammed???? C'mon!That's actually the attitude of phone scammers in 3rd world countries; they think stealing from the rest of us is robbing the rich, thus not a crime. Fuck those people.
I´m a twat becasue I have a different opinion and I explain why?
Is NeoGAF Resetera now where wrongthink is not allowed?
On top of that I remember reading about egs not accepting all forms of payment steam does because they have higher transaction fees and that hits the poorer countries/regions more because they tend to use those payment methods more.Not even that is the whole story, since Valve lets developers generate steam keys and sell them outside of Steam, and Valve gets 0% from those while still paying for the steam infrastructure these games are using.
Then there are prepaid steam gift cards. During GDC Valve revealed, that in Asia 90% of transactions aren't made with credit cards/paypal, they are made with payment options that involve cash. In Japan most players add funds to their Steam wallet with retail steam cards, and it costs Valve 10-15% to distribute them. That means their actual cut there is closer to 5-20%, instead of 20-30%
And lastly, the 30% cut on steam means that other shops that sell steam keys, like GMG or Fanatical etc, can provide discounts to customers even on new games by reducing 10-20% of their own cut in favour of the customers, in order to attract them. If Valve's cut was smaller, these third party stores would have no reason to exist, because they could not provide these discounts, and they would lose their customers. And we would get more expensive games. No more Robocop at launch with 25% discount.
Epic exclusives with VR also use SteamVR. I am sure Epic will come out with proper VR platform any day now.On top of that I remember reading about egs not accepting all forms of payment steam does because they have higher transaction fees and that hits the poorer countries/regions more because they tend to use those payment methods more.
Oh yes, the great steaminput that has wasted countless devs hours.The reason that Valve has the market share is they plow the money into actually improving their platform. That results in outstanding and improving input support, SteamVR, Steamworks features, integrated payment processing fees, Linux support, actually usable and improving discovery features and a ton more.
??? Not sure what you mean, but Steam Input is amazing. At least for actual gamers. I never heard it being particularly difficult to utilize through Steamworks as a developer.Oh yes, the great steaminput that has wasted countless devs hours.
Until they receive reports of input not working and realize it's not their fault but steaminput messing with the most widely used library in the industry. Most gamers won't care as usual because "works on my machine".??? Not sure what you mean, but Steam Input is amazing. At least for actual gamers. I never heard it being particularly difficult to utilize through Steamworks as a developer.
I use a Mayflash and Wii U Controller Pros. Never going back. They work with EVERYTHING. Nothing else needed. They just Work!~!Until they receive reports of input not working and realize it's not their fault but steaminput messing with the most widely used library in the industry. Most gamers won't care as usual because "works on my machine".
Guy is literally old and obese
Im not a laywer either, and I dont actually think Wolffire has a good chance to win, this is a US court after all. The US´s anti trust track record in the last decade is super weak.
At the end of the day, I hope if Wolffire wins Steam will get more competition and gets better. And if Wolffire loses, well nothing will change - Status Q stays intact.
The mistake people here make is to think that I´m "Anti Steam", becasue i critizise Valve, but that isnt the case - it is a good platform for me as a dev.
But more competition would make Steam even better by forcing them to lower dev fees and having better service.
I dont see why wanting that is some sort of antoganistic move that warrants me getting attacked verbally becasue my opinion differs....
After all I thought NeoGAF isnt a bubble like ResetEra where wrong opinions are forbidden!
if Gabe dies then Steam will no longer be pureMany other old and obese people appear in court, why should he be given special treatment?
Yeah but the covid thing is honestly bonkers and likely an effort to not have to take a long-ass trip from NZ to US.if Gabe dies then Steam will no longer be pure