Strider_Blaze
Member
*me drools and rubs hands together*
The special effects look great!
Trailer had me more hyped for the film.
It's no more illegal than the previous Avengers operations internationally. I will admit I'm a bit murky in memory on whether or not the Accords are technically active at that time. Is it that they're signed and go active at a certain time or did they still require a final vote/ceremony?
Unlawful combatants is a pretty big stretch. It's also different from Guantanamo in that the Black Site and General Ross' authority comes directly from the UN, so at that point the UN would be violating its own laws with regards to Human Rights. It's not a hands are tied due to technicality issue or a murky politics issue. It would be the UN blatantly ignoring it's own laws because reasons.
Steve literally tells RDJ he wants to be the one to bring Bucky in and he never lets Bucky get away from him, so your definition of escape is a bit wonky.
The team was detained after Bucky was captured. After the airport, they're imprisoned, without trial, which violates Human Rights (and thanks to no Xmen, they're all humans). The Accords can not retroactively supersede previous UN law.
Ah, here's how we get to 20,000 pages, LoL
Just doing my part! ;p
The previous Avengers operations were immensely illegal, though! Other than the events of the original Avengers, where they're essentially government contractors working for SHIELD in an official capacity, the Avengers are essentially a team of mercenaries on Tony Stark's payroll. They're not waiting for permission to attack HYDRA bases.
The international community is willing to turn a blind eye, because they're doing good work and had earned a lot of goodwill from the whole New York business. But by the time the Accords are put together, the world has agreed they'll no longer tolerate it.
I guess the question there is twofold - is the Raft being operated by the UN, with Ross holding an official position and placed in charge of it's operations? Or is it an American black site, with Team Cap surrendered to US authority because they were operating a super-prison? (Would still be weird for the secretary of state to be personally running things, though...)
I rather doubt they've gone before a judge when Stark visits, but it really depends on how you define the Avengers. Private citizens? Enemy combatants? Terrorists? Is this US jurisdiction, German, ICC?
If they've gone before a judge and officially been charged by the time Cap breaks them out, it's absolutely defensible legally. If not - which I admit is probably the case - yeah, they're being held illegally by pretty much any definition. I suspect that it's Ross doing so on behalf of the US government after Germany relinquished custody, though. The UN doesn't really have the framework to arrest or detain people.
As a digression, I think you could still make an argument for Wanda being detained, considering how little her powers are understood.
What? Steve helps Bucky escape from the government lead SWAT team, directly attacking members of the team so Bucky can get away. Bucky then legs it. That falls pretty neatly into the definition of "escape"
The Accords do supersede previous UN Law, specifically in relation to all metahuman matters, yes. Because those regulations instantly become UN Law, the moment the bill is passed. That's sort of the entire point of the film. There's absolutely no indication whatsoever in the film that Steve's team being imprisoned is an illegal act, either...especially in conjunction with the Accords having recently been implemented and a General within the United States Military (General Ross) and Stark working within the facility...so I'm not sure where you're getting that from.
I think we need to set Doctor Strange on this caseI don't have all the images for OT3 ready yet. Slow down! Whoooooaaaaaaa!
All you need is a big picture of Tony for the Stark Cinematic Universe.I don't have all the images for OT3 ready yet. Slow down! Whoooooaaaaaaa!
Have you come to bargain?I don't have all the images for OT3 ready yet. Slow down! Whoooooaaaaaaa!
I don't have all the images for OT3 ready yet. Slow down! Whoooooaaaaaaa!
I don't have all the images for OT3 ready yet. Slow down! Whoooooaaaaaaa!
I approve of this post.Just fill up the OT3 with pictures of Carol Danvers.
Slayven will never join us againJust fill up the OT3 with pictures of Carol Danvers.
Just fill up the OT3 with pictures of Carol Danvers.
Slayven will never join us again
Just fill up the OT3 with pictures of Carol Danvers.
That's my point. It was always illegal and they weren't ever generally recieved as "bad guys" for it. Hence my "not a fugitive in the typical sense."
Ross is placed in charge of the enforcement of the Accords by the UN, so any actions taken under them falls to their purview regardless of his political ranking with the US Gov't.
Fair enough @ Wanda. I'm still sticking to not-a-mutant = Human though. ;p
Just fill up the OT3 with pictures of Carol Danvers.
Nice to see practical stunt work happening on that level.
I've seen them but they haven't been posted in here.Haven't been on gaf for awhile so I'm assuming you have seen the past bts vids of this shoot (which should wrap shooting this week.)
THe MCU was good before him, it'll be good after him. lolThank You Sony for destroying the MCU with this.
We all agree it's painfully obvious by this public statement, on video, that there is some kind of deal going down, right?
Speaking of Carol, apparently Brie Larson was asked about it often during the Kong press tour. Haven't heard any of it myself to know if there's anything of substance, but she should've read the IW script by now.
I'm assuming if the deal works out well for both sides they'll come to an agreement. If I had to guess, maybe Sony wants even more MCU movies (e.g. Venom or Black Cat)?
Venom is slated for a release date of October 5, 2018, so the studio better get a move on. According to Collider, the Venom script by Dante Harper is going to launch a universe while also being R-rated.
I'm not buying it. There's just too much money on the table for them if this deal works out. Is anyone legitimately interested in a non-MCU movieverse launched by Venom?
Edit:
Admittedly, we *are* talking about Sony, so who knows?
I mean this goes without saying. This seems like a non story though.Fuck Sony. You'll come back for that Marvel money, cause you've got nothing else.
I mean this goes without saying. This seems like a non story though.
That is literally the logline of the film. That's exactly why Toomes is pissed.I'm wondering if Stark starts Damage Control which puts Toomes' salvage/clean up business out of business which is why he hates him so much.