Support NeoGAF

[Socreges]

http://www.thejadedgamer.net/review_ps2_metalgearsolid3.shtml

45%


http://www.ccgr.org/article_read.asp?id=687 (Christian Game Reviews)

Graphics: A+
Sound: A-
Game Play: A
Appropriateness: D
Longevity: B

Overall: B-

 

[Wario64]

*cue Batman "Shit I posted this late" pic


Haha, even Christians find the gameplay excellent, but it's not appropriate so it gets B-

 

[AlphaSnake]

:lol WTF? Appropriateness?

What a bunch of fucking bullshit artists.

 

[Gantz]

Neither were the first 2 yet people splooge all over them for some reason.

 

[tahrikmili]

 

[Socreges]

*cue Batman "Shit I posted this late" pic

Worth discussing twice!

Neither were the first 2 yet people splooge all over them for some reason.

And you know what that reason is? The inappropriate touching.

 

[Lakitu]

Ratrap99
December 01 2004 WHAT ON EARTH IS THIS????

Ooookay. I am the auther of this review. I gave it an A. CCGR decided to change my score. Yes, my overall grade, the one I submitted, was deffinatly an A. So...um...anyone else see anything wrong with this picture?

Did I not say that this game was the closest gaming has ever been to art?

Does it not say that the adult material adds to the game?

Read the review again guys. Please tell me if that looks like the review of someone who would give the game a B- ?

CCGR guys, if you don't agree with what I submitted please just don't put it up. I'd rather that happen and not this. You put words in my mouth. I gave MY OWN REVIEW a 1 score. So here is the official word from the me, the guy who WROTE the review up there.

Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater gets an A.

Mmmm yes.....

 

[Miburou]

Actually, the reviewer on the Christian website gave the game an A, but it was changed to a B-.

 

[Kiriku]

nm

 

[Wario64]

Maybe the site thought the review wasn't appropriate and gave it a B-

teh bias

 

[Socreges]

Maybe the site thought the review wasn't appropriate and gave it a B-

teh bias

That's what's so funny about it. I don't care what individual thought what. The fact is that someone, despite the game having an A in gameplay, though the game should be scored a B- nonetheless.

 

[AlphaSnake]

Maybe the site thought the review wasn't appropriate and gave it a B-

teh bias

Haha, if you read the little entries below the review, one of the site's editor's is like "omg diz game has teh violence so we lowered teh scor newb." No joke. Go look.

 

[Lakitu]

Wyldcard
December 04 2004 I really hope that those trying to extort this site will fail. With the plethora of problems with this game, a B- might be too high. The appropriateness factor is extremely important. The character electrocuting Snake with his powers is occultic. The condoning of sex outside of marriage is also bad. This site is called Christ centered game reviews. The author of this review should realize that not only his score, but the entire review should be Christ centered. Condoning sin, is not Christ centered.

ccgr
December 03 2004 Parents read this site and an A score should be given to squeaky clean games. The rules on the submission form state that we may edit the review/score. Great review, sorry we had to lower the score due to the content.

:lol

 

[Socreges]

Haha, if you read the little entries below the review, one of the site's editor's is like "omg diz game has teh violence so we lowered teh scor newb." No joke. Go look.

Actually, what you said WAS a joke. Kind of like the retards who say "I just shit my pants! Literally!" and such.

The justification, which didn't use words like "diz or "newb", noted that the website is supposed to center around Christ. In that respect, I can understand inappropriateness weighing heavily on the overall impression of the game. Die-hard Christians would be consistently offended by some of the material. That said, they should have removed the review altogether then or not allowed it to be posted if they so disagreed. There's something wrong with having someone post their opinion and then the site modifying it as they see fit.