$1500
jesus
one of those avatar will write an article on you because you touched her butt
For $1500 I expect a full haptic suit I can wear while banging someone's avatar.
$1500
jesus
Theyre already hinting micro transactions via clothes for your avatars.
fucking the new Roblox for the new gen
Get Zucked!The Zuck strikes again.
Sounds pretty Avatarded to me.did she say "'iddd" software, not Eye-Dee?
John carmack is shaking , doesnt have legs, and called himself Avatard
$50 to get Iron man icons around your face microtranaction guaranteed.phone sex is going to be fantastic, soon via codec avatars
Wait people are actually into this and preordering? Holy shit!
Fair point in all seriousness. But the whole Meta experience is such a turn off to me. It seems to lack a strong focus that a niche product would have. Like what is the selling point for this headset? I thought it was the Metaverse; I'll admit I know next to nothing about it overall, and just like to laugh at the whole venture and bad avatars.Well, thinking back on steam index + controllers + towers at launch MSRP even selling, I don’t see why it’s shocking that this has a niche it will sell to?
Total turn off for me, just as index was. When you go from Quest 2 prices to those… ouf
Battery is apparently 1-2 hours too, that’s really bad.
Wait people are actually into this and preordering? Holy shit!
very technical presentation, about qualcomm chipset/ partnership, eye tracking, battery, and heat dissipation. Him not using features on the pro headset he is wearing because he is worried about being embarrassed.
explains the Pro isnt for the general consumer masses.
Talks about the experiences of the Pro not stuttering moving in and out of UI while playing games in background. Pass through experience .
Very honest take on his work and real world differences of the pro compared to the quest 2. Talks of devs , limitations, pretty interesting if you are a nerd.
He definitely is tapped into the the beat of the consumers and nerds alike out there.
To celebrate the $1,500 headset, Meta made some fun new additions to its privacy policy, including one titled “Eye Tracking Privacy Notice.” The company says it will use eye-tracking data to “help Meta personalise your experiences and improve Meta Quest.” The policy doesn’t literally say the company will use the data for marketing, but “personalizing your experience” is typical privacy-policy speak for targeted ads. And if you had any doubts, Meta executives have been explicit about it.
Eye tracking data could be used “in order to understand whether people engage with an advertisement or not,” said Meta’s head of global affair Nick Clegg in an interview with the Financial Times. (Meta didn’t respond to Gizmodo’s request for comment.)
Whether you’re resigned to targeted ads or not, this technology takes data collection to a place we’ve never seen. The Quest Pro isn’t just going to inform Meta about what you say you’re interested in, tracking your eyes and face will give the company unprecedented insight about your emotions.
“We know that this kind of information can be used to determine what people are feeling, especially emotions like happiness or anxiety,” said Ray Walsh, a digital privacy researcher at ProPrivacy. “When you can literally see a person look at an ad for a watch, glance for ten seconds, smile, and ponder whether they can afford it, that’s providing more information than ever before.”
Probably because it's id.did she say "'iddd" software, not Eye-Dee?
John carmack is shaking , doesnt have legs, and called himself Avatard
Carmack is a god in giving tech talks and can talk about silicone wavers and memory IO for 8 hours without pause.
I'm glad he's passionate but I hate to see his talents wasted at this dogshit company with its terrible products.
Holy shit , ive been calling it ID for..............................Probably because it's id.
I guess this is growing up.Holy shit , ive been calling it ID for..............................
since.................
forever............