• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Metal Gear Solid 4 Preview (IGN) !!!

That was a great read. It refreshed my memory on various plot details. I've been hankering to play through all three MGS games again, with the news of 4 coming.

Side note: Props to your avatar.
 
Great read? Excuse me?! So pathetic, wrong and misunderstood. IGNore the preview! And Fortune?! Come on! It's white chick! It's N-A-O-M-I! Confirmed in Famitsu!!!
 
Nervous Hamster said:
Great read? Excuse me?! So pathetic, wrong and misunderstood. IGNore the preview! And Fortune?! Come on! It's white chick! It's N-A-O-M-I! Confirmed in Famitsu!!!

You're certainly entitled to your own opinion, but don't be a jackass about it.

"Confirmed in Famitsu" plus Junior Member automatically disqualifies your post. Have a good one.
 
I am sorry but it's hard to make MGS site for nothing (I am the admin of metalgearsolid.org) and at the same time, huge game portals to spread shits about the game. So many mistakes... How can we expect from the casual gamers to understand MGS then?
 
1. If we're running odds, 90% chance of Naomi, 0.01 % chance of Fortune. I mean, the Vamp+Fortune bit was some of the slimmest logic I've seen in weeks. Vamp's back because, well, he keeps coming back to life in MGS2. Fortune, meanwhile, is more dead than the Dreamcast.

2. While the baby thing makes some sense I suppose, IGN takes another knock for not noticing Raiden is wearing the Cyborg Ninja gear, and that Snake is half drawn as Solidus.

But whatever, as I'm still too taken in by the story to care. Ocelot/Liquid is busy driving around his own personal broken arrow, Arsenal Gear is lodged into NYC (presumably with 20 damaged RAY models inside), and there's a dead president in robot gear on the steps of Federal Hall.

Patriots or no, that's one hell of a mess to clean up.
 
ThirstyFly said:
I'm reading it as I type this, but they didn't mention Vamp being
shown alive in the ending of MGS2
.

That's kind of circumstantial since
it's an image plane, not a model. So it could be interpreted as a cardboard cutout joke and not anything story affecting.
 
That's kind of circumstantial since

True, in Document. But you can see it in SoL and nothing gives it away as a joke in that. Considering the level of detail on the objects close to it in the model, it's probably just a tech issue, not a joke.

Either way, it kind of squashes IGN's Fortune theory.
 
Top Bottom