Yeah, it doesn’t make sense to me either. They have some really good studios to the point they have a chance at competing with Sony but instead of making a traditional console they decided their next console would be Stadia 2.0.That business model completely loses me as a customer. I don't even like it for productivity software, but at least that is software you use to generate your own income, and depending on where you work, is a requirement to do the job.
This is a nice idea to have in concept, but in practice they will at the very least tie perks to Game Pass subscribers, like they've gotten with VALORANT and other games from that dev on PC Game Pass. Perks that will not be made available (in terms of value) to customers on Sony & Nintendo platforms.
Will you pay 40 bucks for 3 days early access?Called it! Looking forward to never having to pay full price to getting my 1 week new Cod fix. Hopefully we get MW3 on Gamepass asap.
You'd be paying more yearly for the sub lol.
You are acting like they are not going to be paying the cost of the sub, which will cost in the range of $131.88 to $203.88 depending on the plan they choose — an amount that is more than $70 yearly.
I think you are looking for an argument here. I am not saying this will or won't happen. I am using the expectation that people have of those who only play COD, the ones that are paying $70 right now, will they switch to a sub service and pay more to play the same game?
Sure, Xbox Game Pass offers more games, but will they care, if COD is all they care about playing?
If you are simply speaking of people who already have a Game Pass sub checking out COD then I am confused as to why you quoted me. I know people who haven't checked out COD all these years will check it out once it is on Game Pass. That does not need explaining, lol.
I honestly think Microsoft would have been better off with any other public publisher since they were gonna have to keep COD multiplatform to make back the purchase even without regulation
Remains to be seen. I'd bet most COD gamers will want to own their games outright.
And this point is nonsense since gamepass costs $130 at minimum per year and for people who only cares about cod.
Yeah....doesn't make a lot of sense to me. On console you'll pay (regular price)$180$204 a year and won't own a thing. COD Black Ops Cold War is still on the Xbox most played list and that game came out in 2020. For the vast majority that are paying $70 for the game, $15 a month isn't going to fly.
This is a nice idea to have in concept, but in practice they will at the very least tie perks to Game Pass subscribers, like they've gotten with VALORANT and other games from that dev on PC Game Pass. Perks that will not be made available (in terms of value) to customers on Sony & Nintendo platforms.
Again from a business POV that is a good move by Microsoft. I just bring it up to show how much the CMA and EC have screwed up by stating full console foreclosure is a non-factor; they have given the OK for Microsoft to do that and much more if they wish. If Microsoft's long-term goal is to spend Sony out of business, and weaken Nintendo to where they'd consider selling to Microsoft, then you 100% bet they will do things like make COD and other ABK content that is console-exclusive to Xbox.
yeah, and that’s exactly what I’m saying will be interesting to see, will those who only want to play COD be swayed to pay extra compared to what they are paying now to play. All of that remains to be seen.It’s 70 plus 60 for gamepass core to play online. So it’s 130 vs 204 so the extra 74 dollars gets you access to all of the games on gamepass. Which will have every COD playable on Series s/x.
Circling back? What are you talking about? It’s what I have been saying. You quoted me, don’t forget.Not sure why you keep circling back to the niche group of users that only care about one game, but OK.
Are you actually pretenting that Microsoft didn't lose a legendary antitrust trial over monopolistic practices relating to Windows and Internet Explorer?The amount of hate people have here for microsoft is mindboggling
Yes big corporations are bad but is Sony any better ? Or apple any better ? Why so much hate towards Xbox and Microsoft ?
Well, he would go "WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT?!" port everything to playstation, kill gamepass and pull steam games to the new Microsoft's Battle.net. Which will somehow still have queue times.i hope he gets phil spencer fired and takes his place as head of the xbox division
BELIEVE
Why? if COD is a staple for you and you’re always subscribed as a result, you have a library with all the games.
…and that $204 gives you access to a digital library of all COD titles, and hundreds of first party and third games. You’re not going to credibly equate a sub service with one game.
That was such a joke comment by Phil... That his career moment would be getting to use other divisions resources and money way beyond what his division can even dream of to just acquire Nintendo or whatever else. Not to release back to back GOTY or the highest metacritic or critcially acclaimed game or most played game... NO... Not that... but what company he can acquire. Should tell everyone all they need to know about Phil and MSWhat a career moment for Phil.
So, uh, I guess we're gonna start hearing about sexual harassment at nintendo or valve next?Well this is the crux of the whole thing, they are essentially playing by their own rules. For example they had a verbal agreement with ATVI to get their games on gamepass at some point prior this acquisition on the condition that they could get the financial side of things to align (5th paragraph down in Phil's email) :
![]()
Needless to say they couldn't come to an agreement that made sense for both parties with Activision so what happens next? Scandals at Activision conveniently leak and make headlines and the stock comes under attack from 3rd party activist firms (sound familiar?).
Lo and behold, look who swoops in to take what they previously couldn't get via mutually agreeable terms. As Phil said, "the long game".
Very sad, I was hoping we could finally reunite the British Empire with the 13 coloniesThe other news that gets lost in all of this is that the US Navy has now called of it's naval "excercise" in the North Sea.
Sleep well UK, sleep well.
So, uh, I guess we're gonna start hearing about sexual harassment at nintendo or valve next?
This is a nice idea to have in concept, but in practice they will at the very least tie perks to Game Pass subscribers, like they've gotten with VALORANT and other games from that dev on PC Game Pass. Perks that will not be made available (in terms of value) to customers on Sony & Nintendo platforms.
You can have your Singularity when I get my Dark Reign.Now that the deal is all but complete, let's start demanding a new Singularity, bros...
People also forget PS users got a few more levels free knocked off the BattlepassNow that the deal is all but complete, let's start demanding a new Singularity, bros.
You don't say ?
![]()
I don't believe this
Will system sales shoot up initially, sure. But why pay $17(soon to be $20) a month when you can just buy the game outright like normal at $70. You would be losing money subbing to GP if you only cared about COD
The UK regulator Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has announced that it has provisionally agreed to approve Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard. The CMA was one of the major roadblocks for the acquisition to be approved, and initially blocked the acquisition back in April due to its potential impact on the cloud gaming market. To solve this, Microsoft announced its plans to sell cloud streaming rights to Ubisoft, a move that seems to have been enough to satisfy the UK regulatory board, which states that “Microsoft has put forward remedies which the CMA has provisionally concluded should address these issues.” The CMA has now opened a final consultation until October 6, where it will make a final decision. Provided no new distributive information surfaces, it can be assumed the CMA will approve the deal.
And PS+ gets an exclusive Oni skin every season. The operator is exclusive to PlayStation until November when everyone stops playing MWII.People also forget PS users got a few more levels free knocked off the Battlepass
Those wanting to complain Xbox is going to give their players stuff thats not available on other platforms likely don't play COD and just want to "war"
Lol. Check out Bobby. He really is the Chesire cat of gaming execs.
People also forget PS users got a few more levels free knocked off the Battlepass
Those wanting to complain Xbox is going to give their players stuff thats not available on other platforms likely don't play COD and just want to "war"
Yup 100% and this seems to be a very hard concept for many of them to grasp. None of us are making definitive statements here, outside of maybe, just them.That's a great sales pitch, but I'd say buying is still the most cost effective for COD diehards. Either buy the latest game or find an old game on sale or used. Remember, Game Pass is only 15% of Xbox game revenue. Vast majority of Xbox gamers have already decided they would rather buy. I think they look at what they are going to pay in a year and come back thinking the same as I do, just not worth it. If Game Pass had the majority of the top games people want to play every year then maybe, but that is just not the case.
Oh I remember buying a 360 just to play map packs early and I wouldn't blame Xbox giving gamepass players extra goodiesPhil Spencer said he wasn't going to do any of that, but I wouldn't blame him a bit if he did. There is nothing to complain about any of this. Microsoft did this stuff when they owned the rights on 360. PlayStation has been doing it since they took the rights away. Now.....Microsoft gets to do whatever they want to do with it.
![]()
Only for long awaited releases like Starfield/Diablo so far. Call of Duty isn't something I'm that hyped for considering how frequent they release, it's personally why gamepass is so ideal for this franchise.Will you pay 40 bucks for 3 days early access?
I hope he keeps his word, exclusive game content is rather lame no matter which company is doing it. Though if I were to guess, I would imagine these decisions get made by Matt Booty.Phil Spencer said he wasn't going to do any of that, but I wouldn't blame him a bit if he did. There is nothing to complain about any of this. Microsoft did this stuff when they owned the rights on 360. PlayStation has been doing it since they took the rights away. Now.....Microsoft gets to do whatever they want to do with it.
![]()
The decision is made because Microsoft is so far behind and need any carrot they can get to sell consoles. The top brass in the company will want content to drive increases in marketshare.I hope he keeps his word, exclusive game content is rather lame no matter which company is doing it. Though if I were to guess, I would imagine these decisions get made by Matt Booty.
Well, as of now this isn't true. One could assume of what may happen, of course.The decision is made because Microsoft is so far behind and need any carrot they can get to sell consoles. The top brass in the company will want content to drive increases in marketshare.
I like the token black guy they put in there just to make sure it wasn't 100% white male corporate executives and politiciansSad. Gaming used to be this:
![]()
Now it’s this:
![]()
![]()
That business model completely loses me as a customer. I don't even like it for productivity software, but at least that is software you use to generate your own income, and depending on where you work, is a requirement to do the job.
We'll see if Game Pass has that much of an effect among casuals. Because before COD, it was Starfield. And before Starfield, it was Halo Infinite.
And those were exclusives (to Xbox). COD will still be multiplat for 10-15 years.
Phil Spencer's narcissism is sad.
This is a nice idea to have in concept, but in practice they will at the very least tie perks to Game Pass subscribers, like they've gotten with VALORANT and other games from that dev on PC Game Pass. Perks that will not be made available (in terms of value) to customers on Sony & Nintendo platforms.
Again from a business POV that is a good move by Microsoft. I just bring it up to show how much the CMA and EC have screwed up by stating full console foreclosure is a non-factor; they have given the OK for Microsoft to do that and much more if they wish. If Microsoft's long-term goal is to spend Sony out of business, and weaken Nintendo to where they'd consider selling to Microsoft, then you 100% bet they will do things like make COD and other ABK content that is console-exclusive to Xbox.
And for people already blinding by their good guy facade, they'll be none-the-wiser as MS will find a way to make it seem like a pro-consumer/pro-union/pro-developer move. The chicken-head shills will regurgitate it in the media to crowd out dissent.
"You'll own nothing and be happy"It impress me people thinking is smart to pay $200 for rent to own nothing... Plus people paying for upgrades for games they don't own like early access.
we did it lads!Done deal - https://www.gaminginstincts.com/the...y-approved-microsofts-activision-acquisition/ Is it finally over?
Now that the deal is all but complete, let's start demanding a new Singularity, bros.
You can have your Singularity when I get my Dark Reign.
when wrong, always make up over the top random things up. lolI think what got it through (could be wrong), the cloud requirement was a lot bigger than we knew because their next Xbox (from the FTC leak) showed it was entirely cloud based. Meaning (and again, I could be wrong) that for COD to be used on the next Xbox it will now need to go through Ubisoft.
Wrong about what exactly?when wrong, always make up over the top random things up. lol
Some people were just born without a brain stem.
Holy run on sentence, batman!Well cod deff going exclusive in 10-15 years time just watch anyone who thinks it’s not doesn’t know how business works lol but can’t blame them we live in Capitalistic world and by the laws Microsoft has all the right to purchase ABK regardless if your morales are for it or not fun times ahead it s a win for Xbox and Pc players it’s a loss for Sony and Nintendo fans in the future.
I would prefer to be dead than live in world like this but i'm sure the purple hairs on era would love this."You'll own nothing and be happy"
![]()
Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better
It might seem odd to you, but it makes perfect sense for us in this city. Everything you considered a product, has now become a service.web.archive.org
(The original has since been deleted for reasons that should be blindingly obvious once you read it.)