I really hate the tortured acronyms plaguing science projects. Hot DOGs? MACHOs and WIMPs? WISE? It's bad enough dealing with insane metrics in astronomy like magnitude without this shit.
I don't think so. Dark matter isn't meant to explain simply missing mass in the universe at large, but more for when examining the dynamics of galaxies themselves. Dark matter is also supposed to have unique properties like being very diffuse to solve the galactic rotation curve problem and finding super massive blackholes does nothing to solve that.
Science GAF - does this change how we think about dark matter now? As far as I know, dark matter as a concept explains that the reason our universe doesn't contain as much matter as is predicted by our physics models is because the majority of it is dark or undetectable. It always reminded me of the luminous ether, more a hand waving explanation of something we don't understand rather than a real answer.
Is it possible that there is far, far more out there than we previously thought? Perhaps all of that missing matter is there, we just can't see it in the visible wavelength because it is literally dark.
I don't think so. Dark matter isn't meant to explain simply missing mass in the universe at large, but more for when examining the dynamics of galaxies themselves. Dark matter is also supposed to have unique properties like being very diffuse to solve the galactic rotation curve problem and finding super massive blackholes does nothing to solve that.