AstroNut325
Member
It's in tribute to the, Mars Climate Orbiter.
LOL!
It's in tribute to the, Mars Climate Orbiter.
Hope it will go well, the bouncy-ball-system of the rover -even if crazy - seemed like a foolproof way to land it safely, while this could turn into almost 1 ton of metal shooting into Mars.
btw. science thread fail for not using kg in title ;P
Hopefully this thing will have the longevity of the other ones. Everyone knows Spirit got stuck, and contact was lost (6 years after it landed.
Opporunity is still going, and landed in 2004
2000 pounds of science sounded cooler than 900 kg of science.
NASA's Mars Science Lab |OT| OVER 9000g of Science!
There are 1000g in one kilogram...
Fuck yeah! Mine too:
*It's my real name on the rover.
It would still be correct, but just not close to actual weight.
NASA's Mars Science Lab |OT| OVER 9000g of Science!
edit: what is the prefix for hecto? Just h? That is what I wanted to use, not regular old gram...
There are 1000g in one kilogram...
Yay I forgot about this, mine is there too. AWWWW YEEEEAAAA
Yeah, no worries. The edit could have made the correction. A simple search could have revealed the answer. It can mislead people. I can empathize with the coffee thing so it isn't personal when I say that it was sloppy.I edited my post to state my intentions
I haven't had my coffee this morning yet!
how did i miss this? i feel left out i hope it wasnt for americans only, since Curiosity has non-american built parts as well.
Fuck yeah! Mine too:
*It's my real name on the rover.
Hopefully this thing will have the longevity of the other ones. Everyone knows Spirit got stuck, and contact was lost (6 years after it landed.
Opporunity is still going, and landed in 2004
Fuck yeah! Mine too:
*It's my real name on the rover.
Did they ever try, or showed interest in sending a rover on that planet or is it too hot for the thing to survive?
The Messenger probe was put into orbit around the planet. No rovers, not much atmosphere for an impressive sunset.
Rendition:
I am SO excited for this.
My name is engraved on it
Well, deciding between the closest two planets from Earth, Mars provides more science with current technology. Tough decisions are made in those budget meetings. A Venus rover is not impossible, just not practical, today.But NASA seems more interested in Mars than any other planets. Even Venus seems to be ignored, but i guess its just impossible to send something there with what's going on on the surface.
That's awesome! How did that end up happening?
Looks like Opportunity will no longer be alone on the red planet. RIP Spirit.
Well, deciding between the closest two planets from Earth, Mars provides more science with current technology. Tough decisions are made in those budget meetings. A Venus rover is not impossible, just not practical, today.
I have that framed. I love that image.Sunset on Mars.
Yeah i know Mars makes more sense these days with current technology, and i bet a Venus rover wouldnt able to see shit down there with all the strong winds, duststorms, thick clouds and whatever else is happening on this planet.
I don't really care about a sunset since i know Mercury barely have an atmosphere to begin with, but just getting someday a picture coming from some rover on Mercury's ground with the giant sun in the sky would be pretty epic. It would probably remind me a lot of some Mass Effect 1 skyboxes.
But NASA seems more interested in Mars than any other planets. Even Venus seems to be ignored, but i guess its just impossible to send something there with what's going on on the surface.
Sounds like a job for 70s soviet engineering!Isn't the surface temp of Venus around 900 degrees or something? Getting something down there that doesn't melt in a few moments, let alone work, would be a awesome.
Sounds like a job for 70s soviet engineering!
It did melt in a few moments, but it was still awesome.
The main thing limiting the amount of pictures we have is issues with camera lens cap, which they couldn't really solve.
For real.
Sounds like a job for 70s soviet engineering!
You get more bang for your buck on Mars. Anything you try to land on Venus will die in a matter of minutes with current technology.
Isn't the surface temp of Venus around 900 degrees or something? Getting something down there that doesn't melt in a few moments, let alone work, would be a awesome.
Aw yeah, you had me at Venus <3 Can't agree more. Venus is so much more interesting, Titan as well. Europa is the most exciting one to me, but getting down there, that is one big hurdle to overcome.NASA has just had a hardon for Mars for so long; much to their detriment as people have gotten bored. We should have focused on Venus, Titan and Europa. All challenges that would have advanced technology and kept the public interested and the funding coming in.
900 degrees really isn't that much, we have coatings that can insulate that much now, and that's available for commercial use.
As for the pressure, it's only about as much as going down 1k in the ocean, so definitely manageable.
NASA has just had a hardon for Mars for so long; much to their detriment as people have gotten bored. We should have focused on Venus, Titan and Europa. All challenges that would have advanced technology and kept the public interested and the funding coming in.
900 degrees really isn't that much, we have coatings that can insulate that much now, and that's available for commercial use.
As for the pressure, it's only about as much as going down 1k in the ocean, so definitely manageable.
NASA has just had a hardon for Mars for so long; much to their detriment as people have gotten bored. We should have focused on Venus, Titan and Europa. All challenges that would have advanced technology and kept the public interested and the funding coming in.
Wow, that doesn't really inspire confidence.
Wonder why they went with such a complicated multi-process landing. Don't they know the golden rule of engineering, as little moving parts as possible = less to go wrong. With this, if there is even one hiccup, it's game over man.
I don't know about the details here, but those two by themselves aren't all that challenging. Combining both high temps and pressures together creates more issues that neither of your examples deal with though. The materials capable of handling those pressures at 1K down in the ocean would behave completely different when heated to 900F.