Omegasquash
Member
Isn't Venus a hellhole in comparison to Mars? Probably alot harder.
IIRC, it's about 1000 degrees hotter, but the atmosphere is so thick that landing wouldn't pose much of a risk.
Isn't Venus a hellhole in comparison to Mars? Probably alot harder.
I only recently learned about the landing on Titan, and I was surprised I had never heard of it before.
But until you posted that, I had no idea anyone had ever landed on Mercury, and sent back pictures! Crazy.
Wha? You mean Venus?I only recently learned about the landing on Titan, and I was surprised I had never heard of it before.
But until you posted that, I had no idea anyone had ever landed on Mercury, and sent back pictures! Crazy.
Wha? You mean Venus?
Recently Steven Hawking predicted we need approx. 200-300 years till the beginning of interstellar flight, so if we won't go extinct in that time frame we will be fine. By the time Sun turns to red giant we will have sufficient tech to build ourselves a new star.
lol. Our sun is so young that humans will be long dead and gone before our sun begins the early stages of star death. In fact, we'll be a tinkle in the eye of Earth history by that time. As if it never happened.
We've known them through indirect methods (microwaves and stuff, I don't know much about it but you can look it up).Uh Venus actually.
Also, how do we know surface temps? The Venera probes didn't measure them, did they? Also, the space crafts had contact with one of the probes for almost an hour, and the second, for 2 hours. I guess if the surface temperatures were really that high (over 400º C) the probes would melt instantly. Idk, I think there's something wrong with this information. Like Jupiter, many people thought its atmosphere was cold as fuck, then Galileo plunged into it and its equipment showed us it was actually a lot hotter than thought.
Live press conference in about 15 minutes
NASAs Curiosity Mars Rover
News from Mars: Hear from my team at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). Live today Aug. 17 10:30 a.m. PT (1730 UT): http://www.ustream.tv/nasajpl
first target planned to be zapped by Chemcam
Awesome pics. Never saw those before. Great thread btw.Did you know the Russians landed on Venus and took pictures?
This image IS color-corrected, the original is black and white
That rock was asking for it.
That is amazing.
I would buy that in a heartbeat if it comes out.
I never knew the martian landscape soil was that fine grained and loose. That explains the debilitating dust storms for me with the impact of that heat shield. Looked like it just landed in sand.
http://www.space.com/17164-mars-rover-curiosity-laser-big-drive.html?NASA's Mars rover Curiosity is slated to fire its rock-vaporizing laser for the first time this weekend, shortly before the 1-ton robot's maiden drive on the Red Planet.
So great. Absolutely amazing. Unfortunately that's still only half the images taken. Can't wait for the full 1200 or so frames to come back!
You can bet the lack of coverage was due to a big reluctance by some countries to cover the accomplishments of Russian space programs. It really is a shame that politics and patriotism has and will be such a major factor for space exploration.I had no idea we landed on Venus.
Yep. I mentioned earlier in the thread, the dust/fines also get EVERYWHERE. It causes a real problem for spacesuit design as well.
The dust is about 50x finer than the dust on Earth, and since it's so tiny it easily gets into the suit, gets into mechanical openings, etc. Walking around or touching the dust would cause it to gather a charge and stick to you as well. That's something they've seen on the rovers. Then what happens when you touch something else? static discharge, like feet on a carpet. Which of course could wreck instruments.
When they did missions to the Moon, the dust on the moon would get into the suits, and they were breathing it in. Part of the problem is the dust on the moon was really jagged, and could cause serious respiratory problems.
We could be dealing with that kind of thing on Mars as well.
There are a lot of issues to consider!
when I read it, I was thinking that the astronauts were doing moon walks and going back into the lunar lander. changing in and out of the suit was where the dust got into the suits and the respirators, but I don't know. It does seem unlikely that the suits would be leaking dust into the suit, or that it could work its way in without causing an air-leak.How could dust get into the suits. Weren't they vacuum and pressure sealed? If air can't escape there's no way dust can get in
So great. Absolutely amazing. Unfortunately that's still only half the images taken. Can't wait for the full 1200 or so frames to come back!
when I read it, I was thinking that the astronauts were doing moon walks and going back into the lunar lander. changing in and out of the suit was where the dust got into the suits and the respirators, but I don't know. It does seem unlikely that the suits would be leaking dust into the suit, or that it could work its way in without causing an air-leak.
Are there any documentaries etc. from the making of the rover? Or any other NASA related good documentaries where they show awesome techy stuff :-D
National Geographic just did one called Martian Mega Rover. It's pretty good!
Thanks. I had no idea the dust was so corrosive on Mars.Yup, the dust would cling to the suits and then they would track it into the lunar module. It would get into the air and irritate the astronauts that breathed it in. NASA has an interesting article on it.
Thats amazing, never heard of the venus landing. Why don't they teach this stuff in school?
I had no idea we landed on Venus.
Good lord, that's AWESOME.
fallagin said:Thats amazing, never heard of the venus landing. Why don't they teach this stuff in school?
Yeap. That video is only comprised of around ~600 frames of the total 1200 or so taken. They haven't gotten all the frames back yet at full res. Gonna be so awesome!Are you serious? I was ecstatic when I first saw the grainy, compressed, potato video that NASA originally released. Than I learned they had HD images incoming. And now we still have half of the images to go. Things just keep getting better and better.
You can bet the lack of coverage was due to a big reluctance by some countries to cover the accomplishments of Russian space programs. It really is a shame that politics and patriotism has and will be such a major factor for space exploration.
After reading the article Volimar posted, I am always going to hear rapid-fire blaster-shots form Star Wars when I think of the laser on Curiosity.Too bad it didn't capture sound too.