Insane Metal
Member
Man I'm sad. This thread and the Space-age thread are DEAD.
I think we need new threads
I think we need new threads
Man I'm sad. This thread and the Space-age thread are DEAD.
I think we need new threads
I always read it. I just don't bother saying anything if I have nothing to contribute.Sometimes new stuff is posted and nobody comments on it. :/
I'm one of the guilty I guess. I haven't paid attention for the last month at least.Man I'm sad. This thread and the Space-age thread are DEAD.
I think we need new threads
http://www.nature.com/news/curiosity-set-to-weigh-in-on-mars-methane-puzzle-1.11721
NASA may announce possible evidence of microbial life in Mars soon, aw snap son.
http://www.nature.com/news/curiosity-set-to-weigh-in-on-mars-methane-puzzle-1.11721
NASA may announce possible evidence of microbial life in Mars soon, aw snap son.
In 2009, he reported finding seasonal plumes of methane following an analysis of observations made years earlier with telescopes in Hawaii1. In 2003, methane levels in one of the plumes reached 45 parts per billion, but three years later the methane had all but disappeared. Now, Mumma says he has results from 200910, gathered using even larger telescopes, that indicate no methane, although the upper limits of his error bars reach 6 parts per billion.
Zahnles main problem with the observations made by Mumma and others is not the existence of methane, but its extreme variability. Mars has an atmosphere that would quickly mix methane. A disappearing plume implies not only a sudden injection, but also a massive sink. The main method by which methane is destroyed photochemical dissolution in the atmosphere yields an average methane lifetime of about 300 years. A disappearing plume would require a lifetime on the order of months. Alternative mechanisms have been proposed to account for this, but they also face problems3. Curiosity is poised to break the stalemate.
Tuning in
The rovers chief tool for spotting methane is its Tunable Laser Spectrometer (TLS). Several times now, during the Martian night, a valve on the rover has opened and let air into a 20-centimetre-long chamber with a mirror at each end. A mid-infrared laser passes through the gas, and if methane is present it will absorb the laser light at particular frequencies. If the instrument is performing as designed, a single 15-minute test should be sufficient to detect methane levels down to 0.3 parts per billion. By looking at the carbon isotopes that make up the methane, the TLS may also be able to distinguish between biological and non-biological sources.
At the Reno meeting, when Mumma stood up to ask Grotzinger about TLS results, the response was blunt. Stand by.
Now the wait may finally be over. NASA has announced that Grotzingers team will discuss atmospheric measurements at a briefing on 2 November. If the rover has detected methane at sufficiently high concentration, or exhibiting temporal variations of the kind that suggests microbial activity, then it will surely motivate a desire to identify and map the sources. If its there, we really ought to figure it out, says Philip Christensen, a Mars scientist at Arizona State University in Tempe.
Another conf in 3:50 hours (10am PDT) http://www.ustream.tv/nasajpl
Man how huge would it be to find microbes on mars...damn.
Yeah, I went to link and it started, they were giving the URL for images and I didn't look at the page.what's playing now is recorded from tuesday. today's doesn't start for another 45 minutes.
Man how huge would it be to find microbes on mars...damn.
Yeah, I went to link and it started, they were giving the URL for images and I didn't look at the page.You miss my edits?I missed your edit )
To me this topic is kind of already been there done that. Do we know life exists elsewhere in the universe at this point? I believe it's nearly a fact that it does.
So this announcement would just feel like confirmation of something we already kinda know, if it happens.
So does this mean no life?
<snip>
With these initial sniffs of Martian atmosphere, SAM also made the most sensitive measurements ever to search for methane gas on Mars. Preliminary results reveal little to no methane. Methane is of interest as a simple precursor chemical for life. On Earth, it can be produced by either biological or non-biological processes.
Methane has been difficult to detect from Earth or the current generation of Mars orbiters because the gas exists on Mars only in traces, if at all. The Tunable Laser Spectrometer (TLS) in SAM provides the first search conducted within the Martian atmosphere for this molecule. The initial SAM measurements place an upper limit of just a few parts methane per billion parts of Martian atmosphere, by volume, with enough uncertainty that the amount could be zero.
"Methane is clearly not an abundant gas at the Gale Crater site, if it is there at all. At this point in the mission we're just excited to be searching for it," said SAM TLS lead Chris Webster of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. "While we determine upper limits on low values, atmospheric variability in the Martian atmosphere could yet hold surprises for us."
<snip>
NASA used the analogy that Gale Crater would be near New Zealand, were it to be mapped to Earth. Does this mean that a summer is approaching?
It is from a "shitty" article but: "Methanogenesis in solid manure also increased with increasing temperatures." The temperature variations in this year-long observation were well-above Martian averages.
I do recall methane being found in Uranus.
It looks as if someone is taking portraits of NASA's Curiosity rover on Mars from a few feet away but wait a minute: Who's the photographer?
The answer is that Curiosity itself is responsible for the pictures, with strong assists from image-processing gurus. These views show the six-wheeled, nuclear-powered mobile laboratory at a geological site of interest known as Glenelg, as of Sol 84 (Oct. 31). They were assembled from imagery captured by the Mars Hand Lens Imager, or MAHLI, looking backward from the end of the rover's 7-foot-long (2.1-meter-long) robotic arm.
Several weeks until they're ready to talk about it? Damn it!Nobody's mentioned this? Any ideas?
http://www.universetoday.com/98576/has-curiosity-made-an-earth-shaking-discovery/
Nobody's mentioned this? Any ideas?
http://www.universetoday.com/98576/has-curiosity-made-an-earth-shaking-discovery/
Nobody's mentioned this? Any ideas?
http://www.universetoday.com/98576/has-curiosity-made-an-earth-shaking-discovery/
Several weeks until they're ready to talk about it? Damn it!
Though the prospect of new Curiosity findings have set the internet abuzz, nobody from NASA has yet said publicly what they are: Grotzinger has refused to elaborate, pointing New Scientist, and other journalists, to a presentation scheduled for the American Geophysical Union annual meeting in San Francisco, which begins on 3 December.