I think both will do the job, although A6000 probably will drop more in price soonish, after the new model is announced. My personal take, however, is that it's not worth investing in Sony's crop system since they already said that their intention is to focus on FF. (I also generally don't consider FF zoom lenses to be suitable for crop system because of useful focal range and you are carrying extra weight for no reason.) If their current lens line up is okay with you then it's probably okay.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
NeoGAF Camera Equipment Thread | MK II
- Thread starter MRORANGE
- Start date
I think both will do the job, although A6000 probably will drop more in price soonish, after the new model is announced. My personal take, however, is that it's not worth investing in Sony's crop system since they already said that their intention is to focus on FF. (I also generally don't consider FF zoom lenses to be suitable for crop system because of useful focal range and you are carrying extra weight for no reason.) If their current lens line up is okay with you then it's probably okay.
hitsugi
Member
I suppose it depends on whether or not the added bulk of the X100T, viewfinder, and 35mm are priorities over a slightly smaller 28 mm pancake with no viewfinder.
That's definitely oversimplifying it though.
x100t. The viewfinder on the x100 series is a main selling point. If budget isn't a concern then go for the better model. The main bonus to the x70 seems to be the touch screen and 28mm focal length. Not enough of a difference to matter in my opinion. If you want to get that focal length on the x100 series, they make astounding adapters to reach 28mm or 50mm.
andythinkpad
Member
It's easier to take selfie. And sexier looking. And ultra wide with the convertor.
Skel1ingt0n
I can't *believe* these lazy developers keep making file sizes so damn large. Btw, how does technology work?
My X-T1 and 23 f/1.4 showed up on Monday. I went ahead and used it as an excuse to purchase a new 300mbps SD card.
Just flew into Rochester, NY yesterday - it's beautiful outside with the snow. Going to try to snap some frozen night shots of Niagara Falls this evening. That 1.4 should work great. Was dicking around last night at the rooftop bar getting sushi with some friends, and the colors are just as extravagant as I hoped - just gorgeous chandelier light bouncing off the colored glass bottles makes for beautiful bokeh.
Unfortunately, couldn't find either my Domke or Ona bags, and didn't want to use a backpack - so I've crammed the camera in the oldest, most torn-up Crumpler bag you've ever seen.
Just flew into Rochester, NY yesterday - it's beautiful outside with the snow. Going to try to snap some frozen night shots of Niagara Falls this evening. That 1.4 should work great. Was dicking around last night at the rooftop bar getting sushi with some friends, and the colors are just as extravagant as I hoped - just gorgeous chandelier light bouncing off the colored glass bottles makes for beautiful bokeh.
Unfortunately, couldn't find either my Domke or Ona bags, and didn't want to use a backpack - so I've crammed the camera in the oldest, most torn-up Crumpler bag you've ever seen.
X100T is trending for $850-900 used. Some of the recent sold listings on eBay even included one of the teleconverters at that price The viewfinder's amazing, the lens is faster and more versatile and it has the TCs available to convert it to 28 or 50 equiv. It's a proven, extremely refined design with a beautiful lens.
X100T.
Thanks a lot! Looks like the x100t is the winner!
you'll love it. i don't use my x100s as much as i used to since getting the xt-1 but I keep it just in case because it's a joy to shoot with.
Joel Was Right
Member
Best lens in the Fuji lineup IMO
andythinkpad
Member
The best XF lens IMO is the 56.
Anyone know any cheap places where I can get a Sony SEL35F18 E 35mm f/1.8 OSS Fixed Lens. They are still so expensive.
Skel1ingt0n
I can't *believe* these lazy developers keep making file sizes so damn large. Btw, how does technology work?
Early impressions are really great. I'm familiar with Fuji's beautiful color and gorgeous .JPEG output; but this sharpness is really something else.
The 56 will probably be the first lens I buy when I have kids.
Joel Was Right
Member
If you had to have one...which would it be?
andythinkpad
Member
56. For normal focal length I shot with my x100s.
Don't get the original. Way too slow.
Yeah, that's what I've found. Gonna keep looking for a cheap used X100S.
JadedWriter
Member
Got my Sigma 2.8 17-50, it's a sexy looking lens, can't wait to use it in the real world.
dpreview compared the old and new canon 35L to the sigma 35 art.
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/8808135799/1-4-and-more-canon-ef-35mm-f1-4l-ii-comparison
<3 my sigma on my 5d.
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/8808135799/1-4-and-more-canon-ef-35mm-f1-4l-ii-comparison
<3 my sigma on my 5d.
JadedWriter
Member
This sounds like I should just invest in Sigma glass.
sigma art, yes.
JadedWriter
Member
I want that 18-35 so bad. Either that or the 50mm.
the better twin
Member
Cheapest ive seen is £319 at cameraworld.co.uk if youre after UK stock.
Photospecialist have it at £300 but are currently out of stock and import from holland I think. This would still fall under the European warranty though.
If you want to take more of a gamble theres plenty of chinese importers, but these wont have any warranty/support from Sony. They tend to be around £250 from places like e infinity.
Skel1ingt0n
I can't *believe* these lazy developers keep making file sizes so damn large. Btw, how does technology work?
I should be working, but here are some very quick grabs from my X-T1 and 23 1.4. Mirrorless AF is a totally different beast than what I'm used to, and all my shots would do better once I get a hold on the quirks of the focusing system. It's tricky, because while 1.4 can see in the dark, it's easy to forget it still has to seek like a bitch.
Probably could have stopped down inside, and bumped up the ISO instead and avoided razor thin focus plane and blur. Still wouldn't fix my iffy focus points.
Overall, though, for night one out? I'm happy. Spent about 30 seconds in LR for each:
Probably could have stopped down inside, and bumped up the ISO instead and avoided razor thin focus plane and blur. Still wouldn't fix my iffy focus points.
Overall, though, for night one out? I'm happy. Spent about 30 seconds in LR for each:
Joel Was Right
Member
Those images should be sharper. Were you shooting wide open at 1.4?
TerryLee81
Member
If I would do video, GH4+metabones+sigma 18-35 would be my gear. Seems to be an awesome combo from what I've seen on the net
Skel1ingt0n
I can't *believe* these lazy developers keep making file sizes so damn large. Btw, how does technology work?
I was - I get tact sharp in daylight - but it was late in the night with those, and I wanted to play with the owl eyes of 1.4. Think I should be getting sharper there, too?
TerryLee81
Member
Looking forward to the PEN-F reveal next week
I'm not clear on if that is just supposed to be the successor to the EP-5, seems like a strange model to release. Guess we'll find out next week.
TerryLee81
Member
Yeah and if the rumors are true, it's going to be pretty expensive, so not really a EP-5 successor
Joel Was Right
Member
Even though Flickr compresses images, the non-portrait images you have there should be sharper IMO. What shutter speed were you shooting at?
These were shot at 1/60sec, 2500-3200 ISO, 1.4
dat ISO
Still dorking around with the menus... the sensor itself is OMFGWTFBBQ but I hate whoever designed the camera around it.
Just an example of its absurdity - It needs a class 10 UHS-3 SD card for 4k 100Mb video. OK have a ton. But no. It says your card is incompatible, unless it is also 64GB or bigger. Of course it doesn't actually tell you this you have to read the footnotes in the user manual.
Still dorking around with the menus... the sensor itself is OMFGWTFBBQ but I hate whoever designed the camera around it.
Just an example of its absurdity - It needs a class 10 UHS-3 SD card for 4k 100Mb video. OK have a ton. But no. It says your card is incompatible, unless it is also 64GB or bigger. Of course it doesn't actually tell you this you have to read the footnotes in the user manual.
Art Teitlebaum
Member
I love my E-M1, but a PEN with built-in viewfinder is something I always wanted since the E-P2. The VF-4 is brilliant, but it looks ridiculous on the beautiful bodies imo.
If the European price isn't absurd, I'm really tempted. But the missus will roll her eyes, that's for sure...
Astral/H3X
Member
dat ISO
Still dorking around with the menus... the sensor itself is OMFGWTFBBQ but I hate whoever designed the camera around it.
Just an example of its absurdity - It needs a class 10 UHS-3 SD card for 4k 100Mb video. OK have a ton. But no. It says your card is incompatible, unless it is also 64GB or bigger. Of course it doesn't actually tell you this you have to read the footnotes in the user manual.
Oh man. I want it so bad.
Not for the 4K of course, but for the low light capabilities. T-T
Its pretty silly...
ISO 102,400 looks like "hi-speed" film stock lol
Just ran some quick tests vs. the D810 for high ISO video omg...
D810 1080p ISO 12,800
AS7ii 4k ISO 12,800
I mean this isn't exactly breaking news I realize, but seeing it in person is something else.
ISO 102,400 looks like "hi-speed" film stock lol
Just ran some quick tests vs. the D810 for high ISO video omg...
D810 1080p ISO 12,800
BLEH!
AS7ii 4k ISO 12,800
HOW?!?
I mean this isn't exactly breaking news I realize, but seeing it in person is something else.
Is it just the form factor you prefer over the EM-1? I use an E-PL5 and it is kind of a monstrosity with the VF-2 attached.
Art Teitlebaum
Member
That's what I mean! The E-M1 is a pleasure to shoot with, but with the battery grip, the size is in DSLR territory. All the PENs are beautiful in their retro appeal, but the lack of a built-in viewfinder is a pity and the external ones are simply ugly as sin and you lose the compactness. I used to shoot a lot with the E-P5 but most of the time the VF-4 stayed in my bag.
So the concept of a PEN-F sounds perfect to me. The problem seems to be the estimated price. If it is really a luxury tax PEN, I might pass.
John Kowalski
Banned
The pen-f is hot af.
The consensus seems to point to the 50mm but Sigmas have notoriously awful build quality variation between models so I've definitely seen examples of the 35 beating it out.
dat ISO
Still dorking around with the menus... the sensor itself is OMFGWTFBBQ but I hate whoever designed the camera around it.
Just an example of its absurdity - It needs a class 10 UHS-3 SD card for 4k 100Mb video. OK have a ton. But no. It says your card is incompatible, unless it is also 64GB or bigger. Of course it doesn't actually tell you this you have to read the footnotes in the user manual.
jealous!
The usb dock will fix that.
JadedWriter
Member
What manner of fucking sorcery is this?
Astral/H3X
Member
I'm wondering if he was using the same lens across both. The a7s's ISO performance certainly is stellar, but I wanna see the receipts on aperture and ss.
Because, as I've found out, noise is not entirely dependant on ISO, but also just how much light you're getting. A brighter scene with the same ISO will have less noise than a darker one.