• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

NeoGAF Camera Equipment Thread | MK II

to battery grip or not to battery grip..that is the question...

My camera is known to have one of the worst battery life in recent history and I haven't seen the need for it unless your shooting straight for 8 hours a day.

I've got a total of 4 batteries but each battery lasts me about 2 hours when I'm just doing pictures... now if I was doing video, I think it tops out at an hour IIRC lol.

But still, I don't see the need for it.
 
to battery grip or not to battery grip..that is the question...
Do you do a lot of portraits and shoot events? Do you like having more camera at the bottom of your hand when you hold it? If you answer yes to these questions then get a battery grip. If no, don't bother. If you're using a Nikon get a Nikon grip. The third party stuff just can't compete.
 
Just curious, anyone used a Sony HX50 or 60 to shoot anything? Looking for opinions.

Want a cheapish small camera with good zoom for video mostly, but still too.

I have some filming inside houses for an estate agent job coming up so want something small and light. It's only going on youtube so nothing fancy is needed.
 
Just curious, anyone used a Sony HX50 or 60 to shoot anything? Looking for opinions.

Want a cheapish small camera with good zoom for video mostly, but still too.

I have some filming inside houses for an estate agent job coming up so want something small and light. It's only going on youtube so nothing fancy is needed.

HX50 or newer should be fine, image quality hasn't improved much in the past few years in compact cameras. Just make sure you know how to use the camera before you need to use it.
 
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM owners.
Comments on lens?

Been waiting this for 4 months, it's is continuysly getting delayed. :(
 
Goddamn that Sigma 85 1.4 is off the charts.

It's twice as big as the Nikkor 85 1.4G.
The size alone is why I don't want that lens the price don't help either. I think I'm happy with 1.8 lenses, 1.4 just sounds like a pain to shoot at. Not to mention the AF. Sigmas need to be calibrated severely.
 
The size alone is why I don't want that lens the price don't help either. I think I'm happy with 1.8 lenses, 1.4 just sounds like a pain to shoot at. Not to mention the AF. Sigmas need to be calibrated severely.

My 35/1.4 art is my walkaround and I shoot wide open all the time with no issues. No AF issues either, but if you do it's not hard to calibrate or adjust with your body's af microadjustment.
 
My 35/1.4 art is my walkaround and I shoot wide open all the time with no issues. No AF issues either, but if you do it's not hard to calibrate or adjust with your body's af microadjustment.
See that's the thing. Every time I fine tune it just winds up being numerical guess work for me. I'm never sure whether to go up or down with that so I usually just prefer not to do it. Not to mention every Sigma lens I own needs calibration. The 17-50, 18-35 and 70-200. I had to calibrate the 70-200 across three different bodies and none of the settings are identical and the 70-200 still doesn't seem to be exactly all there on the D600 yet.
 
Is the 7D still relevant? For reference I have a 600D I use with a Sigma 17-50 and a 135mm super Takumar lens, and some of its shittiest features are starting to drive me crazy.
I want to upgrade but have limited budget, and used 7Ds seem to go for 450€.
The other option is switching to Pentax (450€ K3, and having to sell off the Sigma for Pentax equivalent)
Edit: I really want AF microadjustment, my Sigma is currently fucked up from 35mm on
 
Anyone ever get overwhelmed by choice?

I'm trying to pick a new camera and there are so many options. I am coming from a Sony A55, my first real camera. I would like two dials and a touchscreen preferably. Budget maybe $1000 USD for the body. It'll be used for everything except for action/sports shooting, I think (portrait, landscape, macro maybe, etc.).

In terms of lenses, I think I would like an ultrawide, an APS-C 35mm and probably an APS-C 85mm. I wouldn't buy these all at once, likely just one or two. Some options:

Canon:
80D?
Positives: cheap 10-18mm ultrawide, reasonable 85mm
Negatives: expensive 35mm

Nikon:
D7200 or D7300, if it appears sometime soon
Positives: cheap 35mm, reasonable 85mm
Negatives: expensive ultrawide

Or maybe even Fuji, which has great camera bodies, but the lenses might be expensive for me. I've handled the Canon and Nikon bodies in-store and I still am not really sure...

Any tips? Thanks. Oh, if it helps, I'm definitely towards the novice end. I am only just starting to get a feeling for balancing ISO, aperture and shutter speed.
 
Anyone ever get overwhelmed by choice?

I'm trying to pick a new camera and there are so many options. I am coming from a Sony A55, my first real camera. I would like two dials and a touchscreen preferably. Budget maybe $1000 USD for the body. It'll be used for everything except for action/sports shooting, I think (portrait, landscape, macro maybe, etc.).

In terms of lenses, I think I would like an ultrawide, an APS-C 35mm and probably an APS-C 85mm. I wouldn't buy these all at once, likely just one or two. Some options:

Canon:
80D?
Positives: cheap 10-18mm ultrawide, reasonable 85mm
Negatives: expensive 35mm

Nikon:
D7200 or D7300, if it appears sometime soon
Positives: cheap 35mm, reasonable 85mm
Negatives: expensive ultrawide

Or maybe even Fuji, which has great camera bodies, but the lenses might be expensive for me. I've handled the Canon and Nikon bodies in-store and I still am not really sure...

Any tips? Thanks. Oh, if it helps, I'm definitely towards the novice end. I am only just starting to get a feeling for balancing ISO, aperture and shutter speed.
I'd say get a 7200, but no touch screen and Nikon gives no fucks for DX primes. There's a DX 1.8 35mm that's good and a DX 85mm Macro lens if you want. I'd start doing crop sensor math on that one if I were you. I do believe the 80D has a touch screen. Really depends how much that means to you. I prefer Nikon ergonomics, but it depends on what you feel comfortable with.
 
My D300 died couple of months ago and thinking of replacing it with a D750.

Saw a used one with 25k shutter for $1150. Is it a good buy at that price?
 
Recently got an XT-2 and been enjoying so far just taking random street pictures, landscapes, and other stuff, but I've been meaning to start taking good pictures of food. I've been looking into getting a better prime for doing so. I've heard mixed things about the XF 60mm macro (not a true macro, slow to focus) and wondering if anyone had any experience with it or other suggestions. I have the XF 18-55mm kit lens and the 23mm F2 for reference. Thanks!
 
My D300 died couple of months ago and thinking of replacing it with a D750.

Saw a used one with 25k shutter for $1150. Is it a good buy at that price?

Yeah, it looks like on ebay they're getting bid up to $1300+, so if it's legit and in good condition then it should be fine.
 
Got a chance to play with my new Samyang 12mm wide angle lens over the weekend. The lens got here super fast from South Korea, and it's so far it's all that has been said about it online. Great lens that takes terrific pictures. Can't wait until it get warm again so that I can go to the lake and outdoors to take some landscape pictures.

My next lens will be a Sony 35mm. I'm also interested in getting cheap old lenses from ebay and adapters and seeing how those work. Anyone have any recommendations?
 
Hey, everyone. I'm just getting started with fully-manual photography. I'm borrowing a Nikon D40 + a 16-50mm lens from a friend. I'm looking to get my own, hopefully with video recording capability.

Basically, I'm looking for the cheapest fully-manual video-capable DSLR I can find. I'm definitely far below the limits of this D40.

1. Budget: $200-500 - I'm looking at used cameras. I really just need something to learn on.
2. Purpose: Nebulous... I really just want to screw around with manual video exposure.
3. Form Factor: I'm not picky. I'd prefer something with a large grip (I have stupid-weird hands with hyper-mobile thumbs (the D40 grip is kinda uncomfortable)).
4. Future investment: Not really. The only lenses I think I'll want are a standard ~16-50mm and maybe a ~70-200mm telephoto.
5. The only fully-manual experience I have is on the D40.

I found a used Sony Alpha A57 for $210 on Adorama. I like the 1080p24 video, articulating screen, and the deep grip on this camera:
https://www.adorama.com/us%20%20%20%20848898.html
I also saw a Nikon D7000 for $340, which I believe is pretty good - but it's certainly too advanced for my level of skill.

Also, if anyone knows of a good lens compatibility guide, I'd shed a tear. It's weirdly simultaneously easy to tell if something will work, and difficult to be certain? If that makes sense. Big thanks to anyone who responds.
 
Hey, everyone. I'm just getting started with fully-manual photography. I'm borrowing a Nikon D40 + a 16-50mm lens from a friend. I'm looking to get my own, hopefully with video recording capability.

Basically, I'm looking for the cheapest fully-manual video-capable DSLR I can find. I'm definitely far below the limits of this D40.

1. Budget: $200-500 - I'm looking at used cameras. I really just need something to learn on.
2. Purpose: Nebulous... I really just want to screw around with manual video exposure.
3. Form Factor: I'm not picky. I'd prefer something with a large grip (I have stupid-weird hands with hyper-mobile thumbs (the D40 grip is kinda uncomfortable)).
4. Future investment: Not really. The only lenses I think I'll want are a standard ~16-50mm and maybe a ~70-200mm telephoto.
5. The only fully-manual experience I have is on the D40.

I found a used Sony Alpha A57 for $210 on Adorama. I like the 1080p24 video, articulating screen, and the deep grip on this camera:
https://www.adorama.com/us%20%20%20%20848898.html
I also saw a Nikon D7000 for $340, which I believe is pretty good - but it's certainly too advanced for my level of skill.

Also, if anyone knows of a good lens compatibility guide, I'd shed a tear. It's weirdly simultaneously easy to tell if something will work, and difficult to be certain? If that makes sense. Big thanks to anyone who responds.
I'd honestly get the D7000 if I were you. I pretty much got started on a D7100 and it's only "advanced" until you get used to it. Oh yeah 70-200's are not cheap whether they be F4 or F2.8, what's your exact lens budget?
 
I'd honestly get the D7000 if I were you. I pretty much got started on a D7100 and it's only "advanced" until you get used to it. Oh yeah 70-200's are not cheap whether they be F4 or F2.8, what's your exact lens budget?

Thanks for answering!

Hmm, okay. I saw its size, position in the lineup, and stuff like SD card redundancy and figured I could go lower. I'm also reading now that you can't change the f-stop or see the meter while shooting video? I definitely like the second control dial. I'd also imagine having and easier time finding lenses down the road if I need them.

And, sorry, I should have been clearer; I don't plan to get the 70-200mm right away, just at some point in the future. I'm sticking to ~$100-200 for a basic lens for the moment.

Do you think the A57 is a bad choice? I definitely hear you re: the better Nikon. I've just read some good things about its video modes.
 
XF 60mm macro (not a true macro, slow to focus) and wondering if anyone had any experience with it or other suggestions. I have the XF 18-55mm kit lens and the 23mm F2 for reference. Thanks!

I hear as a portrait lens its quite good and a cheaper alternative to the 56mm 1.2. Check out the flickr pages for each lens and see what you like?
 
Hmm, okay. I saw its size, position in the lineup, and stuff like SD card redundancy and figured I could go lower. I'm also reading now that you can't change the f-stop or see the meter while shooting video? I definitely like the second control dial. I'd also imagine having and easier time finding lenses down the road if I need them.

Yeah. This is a limitation with an old lens mount. There are electronic contacts that change the lens' aperture, but to actually stop the aperture down the camera moves a lever on the lens. On most Nikons to change it you need to go out of live view, change the aperture and then go back into live view. Some high end Nikons (D750, D800, D810) have a stepper motor in the aperture lever that can make fine adjustments and adjust it in live view.

Canon does not have this issue because the aperture in all Canon EF lenses is controlled electronically by the lens itself. It's the same with all mirrorless mounts, micro four thirds, Sony E and Fuji X. Sony A mount actually has a similar mechanism to Nikon, but they don't seem to be plagued with the same issue. They could all have a stepper motor seeing as the newer cameras are in live view 100% of the time.

Edit: Maybe already disqualified by a smaller grip, but my first thought was the Panasonic GH2. It's an older micro four thirds camera made for video.
 
Yeah. This is a limitation with an old lens mount. There are electronic contacts that change the lens' aperture, but to actually stop the aperture down the camera moves a lever on the lens. On most Nikons to change it you need to go out of live view, change the aperture and then go back into live view. Some high end Nikons (D750, D800, D810) have a stepper motor in the aperture lever that can make fine adjustments and adjust it in live view.

Canon does not have this issue because the aperture in all Canon EF lenses is controlled electronically by the lens itself. It's the same with all mirrorless mounts, micro four thirds, Sony E and Fuji X. Sony A mount actually has a similar mechanism to Nikon, but they don't seem to be plagued with the same issue. They could all have a stepper motor seeing as the newer cameras are in live view 100% of the time.

Edit: Maybe already disqualified by a smaller grip, but my first thought was the Panasonic GH2. It's an older micro four thirds camera made for video.

Whoa, thanks! There is a GH2 up on Adorama right now for $280. I think this Olympus lens would work with it: https://www.adorama.com/us%20%20%20%20848545.html

If I'm understanding lens compatibility at all... any micro four thirds lens will physically fit any micro four thirds sensor, but might not work electronically?
 
Thanks for answering!

Hmm, okay. I saw its size, position in the lineup, and stuff like SD card redundancy and figured I could go lower. I'm also reading now that you can't change the f-stop or see the meter while shooting video? I definitely like the second control dial. I'd also imagine having and easier time finding lenses down the road if I need them.

And, sorry, I should have been clearer; I don't plan to get the 70-200mm right away, just at some point in the future. I'm sticking to ~$100-200 for a basic lens for the moment.

Do you think the A57 is a bad choice? I definitely hear you re: the better Nikon. I've just read some good things about its video modes.
It mainly depends on how important video modes are to you. If it is I wouldn't go older Nikon. I don't care for video and purely shoot for still purposes. If you're looking for cheaper lenses then Nikon is usually pretty good. I wouldn't touch Sony lens prices with a stick. I also much prefer cameras with two command dials. Makes changing shutter and aperture pretty easy. You might want to try finding an NEX 7 or something honestly.
 
IMO cheap Nikon's are garbage for video. The images they produce are still great but the camera bodies are ridiculously heavy, plus the aforementioned lack of ability to change the aperture during mid-recording.

The only way I was able to do proper video work with Nikon was hack my D3200 with Nikon Patch and modify the bit-rate options to something above 50mbits(which you can't preview on camera btw lol) and use vintage lenses to skirt around the aperture issue.
 
It mainly depends on how important video modes are to you. If it is I wouldn't go older Nikon. I don't care for video and purely shoot for still purposes. If you're looking for cheaper lenses then Nikon is usually pretty good. I wouldn't touch Sony lens prices with a stick. I also much prefer cameras with two command dials. Makes changing shutter and aperture pretty easy. You might want to try finding an NEX 7 or something honestly.

I sort of figured that any video-capable camera would be at least as good at stills as what I'm using now. And yeah; Sony lenses are heck of expensive. I'm learning that as I shop around.
 
I sort of figured that any video-capable camera would be at least as good at stills as what I'm using now. And yeah; Sony lenses are heck of expensive. I'm learning that as I shop around.
As long as you don't need good low light you should be fine. If you do...that's when it gets tricky. I'm kind of sort of meh in regards to Sony, but that's just me personally, I don't like the user interface. But if video is a thing you can get a Sony or a Panasonic I believe. The G7's aren't hyper expensive, but probably still above your budget.
 
Whoa, thanks! There is a GH2 up on Adorama right now for $280. I think this Olympus lens would work with it: https://www.adorama.com/us%20%20%20%20848545.html

If I'm understanding lens compatibility at all... any micro four thirds lens will physically fit any micro four thirds sensor, but might not work electronically?

The micro four thirds lens mount is an open standard (only lens mount which is I think) and any lens for it should work just fine on any camera. The manufacturers can have some tricks for their own lenses, but if you put an Olympus lens on a Panasonic camera or vice versa it should work just fine.
If you put on a lens mount adapter (like Nikon to MFT) they will usually be without electronics so you'll need to adjust focus and aperture completely mechanically (Nikon adapters sometimes have a ring to adjust aperture). This is mostly for older lenses that were manual focus only and have a manual aperture ring.
There are also some manual lenses made for MFT. The most well known is Samyang (also called Bower or Rokinon) and they make some pretty good value lenses, but focus and aperture are manually controlled on the lens.

Lot's of movie makers like to use manual glass because they use manual focus and manual aperture anyways and the big focus rings are much more suitable for manual focusing. It's not just old camera glass, there are also adapters for using old video camera lenses like PL-mount.
One disadvantage with autofocus MFT lenses is that the manual focus ring is electronic so there is some lag when focusing manually. All mirrorless and a couple of DSLR lenses (Canon STM) have this issue. It's because of how the autofocus works. The only thing that can move the focusing group is the autofocus motor.
 
As long as you don't need good low light you should be fine. If you do...that's when it gets tricky. I'm kind of sort of meh in regards to Sony, but that's just me personally, I don't like the user interface. But if video is a thing you can get a Sony or a Panasonic I believe. The G7's aren't hyper expensive, but probably still above your budget.

I'm new to this, but I definitely know not to worry about low light on my budget. I might look into the G7 in a year or two assuming I have some knowledge/experience.
 
I'm new to this, but I definitely know not to worry about low light on my budget. I might look into the G7 in a year or two assuming I have some knowledge/experience.
Most people really don't need to, just depends on what they do. I do events and my light is un god damn predictable at times. Have fun shooting at 5000 iso and such yeesh.
 
So I am jumping back into the Photography game.

Exciting times, for me. I got all tingly going through and researching my lovely film lenses. I decided to start modest.

Pentax K10D - Extremely Solid Frame nothing but love.

50MM F 1.4 Super-Takumar - This lens has an amazing unique quality and one of the reasons I love film era so much.

I'm eyeing some <20MM lenses but the ones I want are running a bit on the pricey side for me right now. SO I will wait it out and slowly build my collection again.
 
The micro four thirds lens mount is an open standard (only lens mount which is I think) and any lens for it should work just fine on any camera. The manufacturers can have some tricks for their own lenses, but if you put an Olympus lens on a Panasonic camera or vice versa it should work just fine.
If you put on a lens mount adapter (like Nikon to MFT) they will usually be without electronics so you'll need to adjust focus and aperture completely mechanically (Nikon adapters sometimes have a ring to adjust aperture). This is mostly for older lenses that were manual focus only and have a manual aperture ring.
There are also some manual lenses made for MFT. The most well known is Samyang (also called Bower or Rokinon) and they make some pretty good value lenses, but focus and aperture are manually controlled on the lens.

Lot's of movie makers like to use manual glass because they use manual focus and manual aperture anyways and the big focus rings are much more suitable for manual focusing. It's not just old camera glass, there are also adapters for using old video camera lenses like PL-mount.
One disadvantage with autofocus MFT lenses is that the manual focus ring is electronic so there is some lag when focusing manually. All mirrorless and a couple of DSLR lenses (Canon STM) have this issue. It's because of how the autofocus works. The only thing that can move the focusing group is the autofocus motor.

Also if you do go the M4/3 route you can get a metabones speedbooster which is essentially a lens adapter that allows you to actually utilize the electronics (to some degree) of a full frame lens and even get a close cropping ratio of the original frame on your 4/3's. They are expensive but a value if you are invested in both the full frame and 4/3's system and want to swap lenses around.
 
What's everyone's absolute favorite lens right now - just out of curiosity?

Doesn't have to be what you consider to be the "best," - just what you always find yourself grabbing and putting on your body?

It's funny - reason I ask is because the Fuji 35 f/2 is not only the cheapest lens I own by a fair amount, it's also a focal length I don't really care for on a crop - not wide enough to walk around, and not close enough for portraiture. But for whatever reason, it really hasn't left my XT-1 since picking it up on a whim a few months back.

It's crazy sharp - possibly, dare I say it, sharper than any of my other lenses. Definitely, at least, wide open. It's very light. It's very small. The focus is pretty decent. Nice and sharp at the edges, too. Just consistently surprises me.
 
I keep defaulting to my Zeiss 35mm f/2.8 lens on my Sony A7RII.

It's not the sharpest lens, nor is the 2.8 max aperture all that great, but I do like the 35mm angle quite a lot and the lens is extremely light and small.
 
Opinions on the Panasonic GH5 please. The video quality seems amazing to me. It's for about $2700CAD btw.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoYbqSxPWrA

Hottest upcoming video camera. Waiting to see what its final low light capabilities and auto focus (Panasonic weaknesses in previous iterations) are compared to Sony's cameras. The rest of its video features are the strongest for any camera of its price range imo, since it records 4k 10 bit 4:2:2 internally (normally you would need a $1k Atomos Shogun for this with a camera of this price range) , 4K at 60 fps, and HD up to 180fps. (it probably has the best screen as well, but that's not too important)

But for photography I really doubt it beats the Fuji XT2, let alone full frame cameras.
 
What's everyone's absolute favorite lens right now - just out of curiosity?

Doesn't have to be what you consider to be the "best," - just what you always find yourself grabbing and putting on your body?

It's funny - reason I ask is because the Fuji 35 f/2 is not only the cheapest lens I own by a fair amount, it's also a focal length I don't really care for on a crop - not wide enough to walk around, and not close enough for portraiture. But for whatever reason, it really hasn't left my XT-1 since picking it up on a whim a few months back.

It's crazy sharp - possibly, dare I say it, sharper than any of my other lenses. Definitely, at least, wide open. It's very light. It's very small. The focus is pretty decent. Nice and sharp at the edges, too. Just consistently surprises me.
Don't have it for long, but the fuji 23mm is the same for me. A mix of sharp, convenient, and all around useful focal makes it a winner.
 
What's everyone's absolute favorite lens right now - just out of curiosity?

Doesn't have to be what you consider to be the "best," - just what you always find yourself grabbing and putting on your body?

It's funny - reason I ask is because the Fuji 35 f/2 is not only the cheapest lens I own by a fair amount, it's also a focal length I don't really care for on a crop - not wide enough to walk around, and not close enough for portraiture. But for whatever reason, it really hasn't left my XT-1 since picking it up on a whim a few months back.

It's crazy sharp - possibly, dare I say it, sharper than any of my other lenses. Definitely, at least, wide open. It's very light. It's very small. The focus is pretty decent. Nice and sharp at the edges, too. Just consistently surprises me.


I had the 25mm f1.8 on my OM-D. I felt the same, too far for portraits, not wide enough for walk around. But nevertheless it was my favourite. I've sold the Olympus now and ordered a Fuji X-T20 so I think I'll pick up a 23mm with that. Bit wider than the 25mm on the Olympus, more like a 35mm than a 50mm.

I tried and tried with my Olympus for 6 months but I could not get a feel for it. I'd come from a DSLR to it, the menu system was horrific. Tried a X-T1 and the difference is night and day. Fuji nailed the handling.
 
What's everyone's absolute favorite lens right now - just out of curiosity?

Doesn't have to be what you consider to be the "best," - just what you always find yourself grabbing and putting on your body?

It's funny - reason I ask is because the Fuji 35 f/2 is not only the cheapest lens I own by a fair amount, it's also a focal length I don't really care for on a crop - not wide enough to walk around, and not close enough for portraiture. But for whatever reason, it really hasn't left my XT-1 since picking it up on a whim a few months back.

It's crazy sharp - possibly, dare I say it, sharper than any of my other lenses. Definitely, at least, wide open. It's very light. It's very small. The focus is pretty decent. Nice and sharp at the edges, too. Just consistently surprises me.

My Canon 50mm f/1.4, the ultimate workhorse lens. Great for portraits, interviews, and b-roll video.
 
What's everyone's absolute favorite lens right now - just out of curiosity?

Nikon 75-150 f3.5 Series E

Nice focal range, constant aperture, and so fucking light for that combo. Really sharp, wonderful characteristics for an old lens. Very large magnification factor and beautiful bokeh at 150. Absolutely wonderful walking around lens.

Best 60 bucks I ever spent.
 
What's everyone's absolute favorite lens right now - just out of curiosity?

I haven't had it for too long and I'm not an expert but I really do like my 50mm Sony with OSS for the E-Mount. It's a little pricier than 50mm lenses for other system but the quality is great. I've taken some great pictures with it.
 
Found a good deal on a 56 1.2 APD.

It's effectively a 1.7 aperture with worse auto-focus for marginal improvement to bokeh characteristics. I have a 56 1.2 standard that I've never 100% loved (a little less sharp than I think it should be), and I'm debating doing an "upgrade." (side-grade?)
 
What's everyone's absolute favorite lens right now - just out of curiosity?

Doesn't have to be what you consider to be the "best," - just what you always find yourself grabbing and putting on your body?

It's funny - reason I ask is because the Fuji 35 f/2 is not only the cheapest lens I own by a fair amount, it's also a focal length I don't really care for on a crop - not wide enough to walk around, and not close enough for portraiture. But for whatever reason, it really hasn't left my XT-1 since picking it up on a whim a few months back.

It's crazy sharp - possibly, dare I say it, sharper than any of my other lenses. Definitely, at least, wide open. It's very light. It's very small. The focus is pretty decent. Nice and sharp at the edges, too. Just consistently surprises me.

I love my Sigma 30mm 1.4 on my A6000.

It's incredibly sharp, perfect focal length for walking around IMO. Works in day or night.
 
Need some camera advice from you guys. I've got the Olympus EM1 M2 with few good lenses (12,25,45,75mm). I'll state that this is my first proper camera so I don't have much knowledge about cameras.
I love the feel and size of the Olympus EM1 but I've been thinking with how expensive good lenses are, would be better for me to get another camera like perhaps one of the Sony full frame cameras.
I mostly shoot stills and would like some good video too but with how expensive the great olympus pro and panasonic M4/3 lenses are would it be smarter to buy a sony full frame and invest in that system instead.

Things I am looking for are, great quality stills, decent 4k video and small size.
The Sony A7 series cameras are great size wise but how are the lens sizes. I'd mostly want lesnes under 100mm.
 
Top Bottom