you knew it would receive zero points right. that's why you did that? normally i tell people to update their stuff but it seemed like you intentionally were doing things your own way so i left it alone.
yeah i was just having fun, no worries
you knew it would receive zero points right. that's why you did that? normally i tell people to update their stuff but it seemed like you intentionally were doing things your own way so i left it alone.
Between Minish Cap (which was good but nothing amazing) and A Link Between Worlds (which, even though it's a quality game, rides a bit too hard on the nostalgia train & relies far too much on the wall-sneak mechanic), portable Zeldas have been far worse than any console Zeldas. Console Zeldas have had some flaws, but they are still more imaginative and/or of higher quality than absolutely mediocre games like Phantom Hourglass.Majora's Mask has to be the most overrated game of the 5th gen if you ask me. I thought it was pretty mediocre for a Zelda offering ... but pretty much most of the Zelda's post OOT have been mediocre compared to OOT. The handheld ones have been pretty strong though.
Suikoden 2 & Lunar I can give you, but Star Ocean 2? I just don't think it's anything too special. I don't think of FFIX as highly as a lot of other FF/JRPG fans, but it's still better than Star Ocean 2. It falls along JRPGs like some of the more mediocre Tales of entries. There's some stuff to like and nothing is inherently broken/really badly designed but as an overall package it just feels lacking and a bit too generic.FFIX also. So many better RPG's in the 5th gen that that one. Suikoden 2, Star Ocean 2, Lunar, etc. I would put WAY over FFIX.
Gaf you get that Gold/Silver > Red/Blue, so how come you haven't realized that Perfect Dark > Goldeneye?
Blame my nostalgia but I cannot disagree more. The best portable zelda game by far imo.Between Minish Cap (which was good but nothing amazing).
Its objective based, semi-stealthy single player was done pretty well and was far more replayable than the extremely linear & straightforward Half-life campaign + it had a superbly fun multiplayer. Sure, maybe Half-life's underlying FPS mechanics have aged better and from a storytelling POV it was more groundbreaking, but yeah, if I had to guess, I'd say the single player campaigns mission design and especially the multiplayer are big reasons why Goldeneye is perhaps remembered a bit more fondly (+ the people who have voted seem to lean more on the console side of things from that era), no matter if it actually holds up all that well when played today.I would've swapped some positions and added a few titles that didn't make it to top 20, but overall this is a good list. Though I'll never understand the love for Goldeneye and certainly will never agree with the notion of it being a better FPS than Half-Life, but whatever.
Its objective based, semi-stealthy single player was done pretty well and was far more replayable than the extremely linear & straightforward Half-life campaign + it had a superbly fun multiplayer. Sure, maybe Half-life's underlying FPS mechanics have aged better and from a storytelling POV it was more groundbreaking, but yeah, if I had to guess, I'd say the single player campaigns mission design and especially the multiplayer are big reasons why Goldeneye is perhaps remembered a bit more fondly (+ the people who have voted seem to lean more on the console side of things from that era), no matter if it actually holds up all that well when played today.
No bigger travesty than FF8 being on the list at all.
Yup.Damn, I forgot to vote. I see no transgressions on the list, except Final Fantasy VIII even being in the Top 10.000 games of Gen 5.
Yup.Wow, Panzer Dragoon Saga barely made the list, would've been so unfair if it was left out.
Aaand yup. Said the same thing when I saw this, hah. Hell I said as much writing my list to begin with, which heavily featured Konami.How the mighty have fallen. =/
Many of these votes are the result of nostalgia. Who in their right mind would actually want to play Goldeneye today. That shit is painful.
Goldeneye got robbed. Most replayable game of the generation by miles.
I'm butthurt about the Saturn being so grossly underrepresented, so I guess I should be happy I got quoted for Panzer Dragoon Saga. At least it made the list.
Yeah but NeoGAF is an enthusiast's site, it should have been more represented, lol.the sega saturn sold less than 1.3m units in the us. it was most popular in japan where it sold 5.5m units (more than the n64, even). although europe doubled the us number, it still isn't a ton of folks that had one. panzer dragoon representing the saturn is actually quite a feat. until shadow hog's post, grim fandango was #25. panzer dragoon bumped it out of the top 25, and that was the only time during the entire vote that saturn was on the top 25.
Yeah but NeoGAF is an enthusiast's site, it should have been more represented, lol.
Thanks, Shadow Hog!
One of these days I hope to experience what the fuzz is about. I have started the game like 4 times between different versions (64, GC, 3DS) and I just can't get into it. It's not like I hate the Zelda formula, I really like Wind Waker, Twilight Princess and Alundra for example. And it's not about nostalgia factor either since I did try it out when it was fresh but there was just nothing for me when I got a chance to sit down with N64 compared to Mario 64 for example or hell, Mario Party.
I just need to force myself to play it entire way through someday. I think the furthest I have gotten is after the mountain dungeon or something.
Whoever voted for Liero deserves a medal.
Majora's Mask has to be the most overrated game of the 5th gen if you ask me. I thought it was pretty mediocre for a Zelda offering ... but pretty much most of the Zelda's post OOT have been mediocre compared to OOT. The handheld ones have been pretty strong though.
If I don't see THPS2 on the 6th gen list I will get enraged. It's okay not putting THPS2 on the 5th gen list, at least the higher up games, but on the next gen is a must.
Not really that surprising list. Dissapointed that OoT is first but that was to be expected.
Why was my Wings vote not counted though? Can't find it on the list. Not that it matters much since I was probably the only one who voted it but still. I need answers ani!
Not really that surprising list. Dissapointed that OoT is first but that was to be expected.
Why was my Wings vote not counted though? Can't find it on the list. Not that it matters much since I was probably the only one who voted it but still. I need answers ani!
Almost forgot to vote it when I was making my list. Easily one the best splitscreen games I've played.
IMO OoT is by far most overrated Zelda. It felt really by the numbers Zelda game. I highly prefer MM over it and pretty much any other Zelda I've played.
here's what i'm thinking for gen 4:
pc and arcades: 1989-1993
consoles:
cd-i
laseractive
neo geo
sega genesis/mega drive
sega cd/mega drive cd
sega 32x
sega pico
super nintendo
turbografx-16/pc engine
turboduo/turbografx-cd/pc-engine duo/pc-engine cd
handhelds:
game gear
game boy (1989-1995)
lynx
turboexpress
all i could find about wings was a pc game from 1990
I'm totally cool with people preferring MM over OOT. I'll never agree with it, but I will always admit that MM sits among the most unique videogames ever created. That said, I'm curious -- what historical reference do you allude to when you compare Ocarina to other Zeldas? As far as I recall, having played Zelda 1, 2, and LTTP growing up, Ocarina of Time entrenched and set in stone all that had been attempted before it. Basically, it perfected it in ways that were unimaginable at the time.
Between Minish Cap (which was good but nothing amazing) and A Link Between Worlds (which, even though it's a quality game, rides a bit too hard on the nostalgia train & relies far too much on the wall-sneak mechanic), portable Zeldas have been far worse than any console Zeldas. Console Zeldas have had some flaws, but they are still more imaginative and/or of higher quality than absolutely mediocre games like Phantom Hourglass.
Suikoden 2 & Lunar I can give you, but Star Ocean 2? I just don't think it's anything too special. I don't think of FFIX as highly as a lot of other FF/JRPG fans, but it's still better than Star Ocean 2. It falls along JRPGs like some of the more mediocre Tales of entries. There's some stuff to like and nothing is inherently broken/really badly designed but as an overall package it just feels lacking and a bit too generic.
Its multiplayer is pretty dated, but the single player is surprisingly fresh thanks to its open ended, mission based structure. Objectives are not immediately obvious and encourages exploration while the different difficulty modes completely changes how you approach most levels.Many of these votes are the result of nostalgia. Who in their right mind would actually want to play Goldeneye today. That shit is painful.
Bollocks. I think AniHawk is right, I'm just disappointed.maybe its library just isn't that great compared to n64 and ps1 ^_^
As far as fully 3D games, yes.maybe its library just isn't that great compared to n64 and ps1 ^_^
I mean I love my saturn and many of its expensive ass games but it doesn't even come close to the n64 and ps1 imo
You could also see it as votes being spread more thinly though. PS1 has undoubtedly the deepest software lineup of the generation but it will spread the vote to a larger number of games. If you only owned an N64 then the choices are much clearer then if you only owned a PS1.Forgot to vote here. Oh well. Surprised by how dominant Nintendo was here, considering how strong the PSX library is often lauded.