How much money are they going to lose because of this? Because I feel like a lot of people aren't going to bother buying their own subscriptions.
This is a pretty optimistic take. The paying sugar daddy in your example may very well leave the service since there are tons of new restrictions put on them now, especially if they travel often. This makes the service (for a lot of people) much less convenient than it used to be, and punishes users who did nothing wrong. The leechers in your scenario are much more likely to ditch the service rather than pay for it. If they even had a 10% retention rate on those accounts, I would be absolutely floored. I'm sure there was a lot of actual abuse, but again there are legitimate use cases where someone would need to do this (living part of the year in different locales, kids in college, etc.).None as they're dramatically lowering costs of operations (i.e no more 10's of millions of leechers streaming 4K HDR for free), and will gain 10x more new subs than they'll lose. Virtually no one is actually splitting the cost, in >90% of cases one person pays and just lets everyone else use it. That paying sugar daddy isn't going anywhere, but inevitably a shit ton of his leechers will wind up begudgingly paying for their own account. All the other streaming services will no doubt follow suite within the next year or two.
Back to torrents I guess.
I remember the days when the mere mention of piracy used to get you permabanned. Now mods promoting it. Never thought I would see the day.Who said we left
I remember the days when the mere mention of piracy used to get you permabanned. Now mods promoting it. Never thought I would see the day.
You're preaching to the choir, I torrent all my movies/shows, but I recall things being way different in the past.This is a gaming forum. We don't pirate games here and I never pirate games. I also have a Netflix account!
But sometimes I just cant find the movie I want on netflix, or amazon or hulu etc etc etc.
You're preaching to the choir, I torrent all my movies/shows, but I recall things being way different in the past.
Gabe Newell understood this in 2011:Back to torrents I guess.
“We think there is a fundamental misconception about piracy. Piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem,” he said. “If a pirate offers a product anywhere in the world, 24 x 7, purchasable from the convenience of your personal computer, and the legal provider says the product is region-locked, will come to your country 3 months after the US release, and can only be purchased at a brick and mortar store, then the pirate’s service is more valuable.”
"Every time you share your password we'll make you watch another live action anime adaptation"
Since they charge for additional streams and have always let people share those extra streams, the government(s) should force them to drop every single account to a single stream offering. If people still want multi-streams they will log in and hit the option. Screw their TOS. They allowed a common practice to form with glee over the rise it gave them. If they want to change the reality deal, they should take the hit to make sure no one is paying for something taken away.
PlexHonestly this sounds awful. Couldn't they have made it easier?
I dont share my Netflix at all but also we have devices that never log onto Netflix unless we are travelling like old tablets and stuff. Having to authenticate those with a special code sounds super lame.
EDIT - Ya our main device which uses Netflix (Shield Pro) is connected with an ethernet cable. So what is this WIFI stuff?
Adding this here for posterity.
This is a pretty optimistic take. The paying sugar daddy in your example may very well leave the service since there are tons of new restrictions put on them now, especially if they travel often. This makes the service (for a lot of people) much less convenient than it used to be, and punishes users who did nothing wrong. The leechers in your scenario are much more likely to ditch the service rather than pay for it. If they even had a 10% retention rate on those accounts, I would be absolutely floored. I'm sure there was a lot of actual abuse, but again there are legitimate use cases where someone would need to do this (living part of the year in different locales, kids in college, etc.).
You're right that it should dramatically lower their operations costs though.
Hah, the moment my profile on account owned by a friend stops working is the day I stop using Netflix.
Your theory only works If the paying sugar daddy is doing it all by himself while others just leech off of him.But in most examples I reckon friends just use 1 friend's acount to share but also split the payment between all 4 or 5.So instead of paying 6.99 or whatever they each pay 1.50 instead.Now take that away you really think the "sugar daddy" will hapilly start paying 6.99 on his own for the garbage Netflix produces? I think it's more likely he'll cancel and move to another subscription like Disney + that still allows for him to split the pay with his other 5 friendsNone as they're dramatically lowering costs of operations (i.e no more 10's of millions of leechers streaming 4K HDR for free), and will gain 10x more new subs than they'll lose. Virtually no one is actually splitting the cost, in >90% of cases one person pays and just lets everyone else use it. That paying sugar daddy isn't going anywhere, but inevitably a shit ton of his leechers will wind up begudgingly paying for their own account. All the other streaming services will no doubt follow suite within the next year or two.
There must be another way.So I can only use my Netflix when I travel for 7 days before I have to fly home to sign in on the home wifi?
That is true. To what degree I don’t know but when I was using NF a lot years ago with my bros account I split the costs with him.Your theory only works If the paying sugar daddy is doing it all by himself while others just leech off of him.But in most examples I reckon friends just use 1 friend's acount to share but also split the payment between all 4 or 5.So instead of paying 6.99 or whatever they each pay 1.50 instead.Now take that away you really think the "sugar daddy" will hapilly start paying 6.99 on his own for the garbage Netflix produces? I think it's more likely he'll cancel and move to another subscription like Disney + that still allows for him to split the pay with his other 5 friends
Your theory only works If the paying sugar daddy is doing it all by himself while others just leech off of him.But in most examples I reckon friends just use 1 friend's acount to share but also split the payment between all 4 or 5.So instead of paying 6.99 or whatever they each pay 1.50 instead.Now take that away you really think the "sugar daddy" will hapilly start paying 6.99 on his own for the garbage Netflix produces? I think it's more likely he'll cancel and move to another subscription like Disney + that still allows for him to split the pay with his other 5 friends
Yeah, this is incredibly stupid.There must be another way.
If i cant watch on my vacation this summer due to this bullshit i will cancel my premium.
This is me. I work away from home in different locations constantly That will be me cancelling.I'm more interested in what to do if I'm in 3 different cities in 7 days.
Except I pay my friend, and if he cannot split the cost with others, he will be cancelling too.They'll hate to see you go, considering they're paying between 10-20 cents per GB of data for you to watch their stuff for free.