Neuroscientist claims evidence of post-death brain communication

Nocty

Member
Well well, this is a very interesting interview.

Will post it at the bottom as a title this click-baity needs a bit of preamble I would say. The credentials of this doctor are excellent, Dr. Tara Swart;

• Cambridge neuroscientist
• Medical doctor specialized in psychiatry
• Has literally "locked people up" for psychotic episodes

She's the last person you'd expect to believe in signs from the dead, but here we are. It's a long video, but it's absolutely fascinating. At first when she began talking about this, I thought bullshit immediately, but then the evidence started rolling on the longer the video went along.

 
Last edited:
Starting your thumbnail sentence with a lower-case letter I is an instant no from me - can't even get the basics right.
 
Last edited:
I listened to that podcast a few days ago. It was quite interesting indeed.
And before you claim this stuff to be stupid... Carl Jung is one of the best know psychiatrists ever and he also had some wild views of the afterlife. Faszinating stuff.
 
Last edited:
Well well, this is a very interesting interview.

Will post it at the bottom as a title this click-baity needs a bit of preamble I would say. The credentials of this doctor are excellent, Dr. Tara Swart;

• Cambridge neuroscientist
• Medical doctor specialized in psychiatry
• Has literally "locked people up" for psychotic episodes

She's the last person you'd expect to believe in signs from the dead, but here we are. It's a long video, but it's absolutely fascinating. At first when she began talking about this, I thought bullshit immediately, but then the evidence started rolling on the longer the video went along.


I am going to listen to this, but it's a huge mistake to assume because someone has an education and demonstrated intelligence in certain fields or applications that they can't be batshit insane or stupid as fuck in other ways. Humans have constant examples of this, all the time, every day, and yet we still fall for this trap.

Also, Bartlett is full of shit. CEO my ass.

Anyway, as someone who considers themselves spiritual, I'll listen to it. After 15 minutes, "I was experiencing symptoms common with psychosis or schizophrenia, but because I'm a psychologist, I know better and it was really my dead husband communicating," is pretty hard to take seriously. "Our disconnection with nature compared with our ancestors is why we're so unhappy," again, like based on what? What do you mean disconnected with nature? How do you know our ancestors felt any different? I think many of them probably felt despair, fear, depression, and lived short lives.

"Whatever we've been doing until now certainly hasn't been working." What does this even mean? Hasn't been working how? For who? You're treating the entire world as a monoculture and assuming they all feel the same as you do.

She talks a lot of shit with a lot of authority and certainty.

I am just inherently skeptical of people who are trying to sell.
 
Last edited:
I'm 45 minutes into this and there's no evidence or really anything of substance yet. Does it become more convincing later?
 
I really enjoyed this movie. Had a great vibe to it:

Cjb09L67B0XYJ22b.jpg
 
Wasn't there a book/movie where they proved there was "life after death" via some new technology and like 20% of the population immediately commits suicide?

lmao, there it is right above me!
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't dare tell my opinion on this video, but at least i learned that you actually find science and don't build it upon empirical observation as i always thought.
Also some part of this science laying on the ground (maybe half i don't really know) , was put there by someone that never meant for us to find it.
One could argue those two things are actually more groundbreaking than life after death.
 
If humans are a form of information and information cannot theoretically be destroyed, then humans technically live forever as probably with all life. Just in another phase, plane, level, existence or however it should be called. Just because human eyes cannot see things or otherwise technologies detect them, doesn't mean those things do not exist. That said, with the amount of galaxies and the planets within them, it raises the possibility that your worst nightmares (or good dreams) are in fact true. If you know anything about quantum states which I have no idea about, then you would already know that cats understand all of this already.

Cat Nbc GIF by Saturday Night Live
 
Last edited:
If humans are a form of information and information cannot theoretically be destroyed, then humans technically live forever as probably with all life.
That's not what that means, it just means you can run the quantum process backwards to get whatever it is to the previous state, it doesn't mean that that state persists forever; it's like how we're all made out of "star stuff", that doesn't mean we're literally stars, just that it's the same base components.
 
The best discovery is Russia's, the cancer vaccine, and I hope releases it, and the eradication of the Down syndrome gene, which he did in Japan. Let them do it, and I don't give a damn what another country says.
 
Last edited:
The best discovery is Russia's, the cancer vaccine, and I hope releases it, and the eradication of the Down syndrome gene, which he did in Japan. Let them do it, and I don't give a damn what another country says.
I wouldn't dare tell my opinion on this video, but at least i learned that you actually find science and don't build it upon empirical observation as i always thought.
Also some part of this science laying on the ground (maybe half i don't really know) , was put there by someone that never meant for us to find it.
One could argue those two things are actually more groundbreaking than life after death.
Episode 5 What GIF by The Office
 


I'm glad that Russia and Japan is so advanced.

 
Last edited:
I've read some research papers that have documented near-death experiences. And by near death it means the patient was clinically dead with no brain activity but was later revived. Their experiences almost always match and there were plenty of instances of them seeing stuff like objects above a closet that they couldn't physically see with their bodies while their ghostly apparition float around near their physical bodies in an operating room.

Near-death experiences often occur in association with cardiac arrest.5 Prior studies found that 10–20 seconds following cardiac arrest, electroencephalogram measurements generally find no significant measureable brain cortical electrical activity.6 A prolonged, detailed, lucid experience following cardiac arrest should not be possible, yet this is reported in many NDEs. This is especially notable given the prolonged period of amnesia that typically precedes and follows recovery from cardiac arrest.7

The OP posts brain activity though so are they really dead?
 
Most people really want to exist forever in some form, because non-existence sounds scary and makes no sense. That's why you see even intellectuals believing in bullshit that support this idea. This is how religions were born.

Yeah, maybe there is some brain activity after death. But let's not kid ourselves, please. We didn't exist before we were born and we won't exist after we die. It sucks but at least we won't suffer any inconvenience.
 
We already know the brain can still function up unto a point from blood loss. We figured that out in the middle ages. But it's also common sense that even if you could revive a brain past this point, there's so much damage the person is gone anyway, despite if you get some ticks. She seems like a wack job. The only exception to these rules are comas I guess, where some people just wake up unexpectedly
 
Last edited:
Wasn't there a book/movie where they proved there was "life after death" via some new technology and like 20% of the population immediately commits suicide?

lmao, there it is right above me!
There's a Chuck Palahniuk short story where they discover that after death you emigrate to an eternal party on Venus, but only if there isn't a vacant body for your soul to inhabit on Earth. Every time a baby is born, somebody gets transported back home.

So governments start distributing suicide kits, reluctant countries are nuked, and death squads roam the streets to ensure nobody misses out.
 


For those interested in the topic here's a video I found some while ago.

I personally think that maybe there's more to death that we know. But I would like to experience some stuff first hand. It's hard to believe. You end up trusting other person judgment as true.
 
Last edited:
Personally I find the concept of "afterlife" and consciousness persisting after death science fiction, but I do believe in "soul" although as an abstract essence that is part of an infinite and unchanging side of nature (as Plato described that soul is never born but is eternal, pre-existing). However if consciousness does persist after death, wouldn't it mean that our brains are just mediums of a signal and the source exists elsewhere:pie_thinking:? When I hear about people being dead but still having dream like experiences, I tend to think the dream is the fraction of a second brain juice trip that just feels like everlasting, just like in dreams we lose concept of time outside our heads.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom