• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

New HIV drug.

Status
Not open for further replies.

marsomega

Member
Did a search and found nothing.. (Search HIV AIDS JAPAN)
http://www.sciencedaily.com/upi/ind...=UPI-1-20050706-05305900-bc-japan-newdrug.xml

Current AIDS medications often lose their effectiveness after a few days due to the virus' resistance, but the AK602 reacts to human cells instead of attacking the virus, said Mitsuya, a university professor.

When the new drug becomes attached to the protein that acts as an entrance into human cells for the AIDS virus, it can prevent HIV from entering.

The researchers conducted clinical tests on 40 AIDS patients in the United States. When the patients took 0.02 ounces of AK602 twice a day for 10 days, the number of HIV viruses dropped to an average of 1 percent.

Awesome.
 

Kiriku

SWEDISH PERFECTION
milanbaros said:
The more HIV affects the West the faster the vaccine will come. I don't know about a cure though.

Yeah...cure sounds very unlikely, since it's a virus. Correct me if I'm wrong, but there aren't any cures per se for viruses at all...even though you can recover from some virus infections naturally (or at least limit its effects).
IF they would find a cure for HIV though, that would be a huge breakthrough...not just when it comes to HIV.
 

karasu

Member
Kiriku said:
Yeah...cure sounds very unlikely, since it's a virus. Correct me if I'm wrong, but there aren't any cures per se for viruses at all...even though you can recover from some virus infections naturally (or at least limit its effects).
IF they would find a cure for HIV though, that would be a huge breakthrough...not just when it comes to HIV.


There's a monoclonal antibody that cures West nile Virus... in mice.
 

karasu

Member
Viruses: non-living or alive?

A virus makes use of existing enzymes and other molecules of a host cell to create more virus particles. Viruses are neither unicellular nor multicellular organisms; they are somewhere between being living and non-living. Viruses have genes and show inheritance, but are reliant on host cells to produce new generations of viruses. Many viruses have similarities to complex molecules. Like DNA, viruses undergo molecular replication and they can often be crystallized. Because viruses are dependent on host cells for their replication they are generally not classified as "living". Whether or not they are "alive", they are obligate parasites, and have no form which can reproduce independently of their host. Like most parasites, they have a specific host range, sometimes specific to one species (or even limited cell types of one species) and sometimes more general.

Viruses form when molecules are assembled from organic compounds providing complex, microscopic structures which have the potential for self-assembly, and thusly they have large implications in the study of the origin of life. In the debate of whether viruses are alive or not, if the requirement for autonomous self-reproduction is abandoned, it can be strongly argued that viruses are indeed alive. Some small viruses are more efficient than most cellular life forms as their ratio of functions to working parts is so high. If viruses are alive then the prospect of creating artificial life is enhanced or at least the standards required to call something artificially alive are reduced.

http://www.answers.com/topic/virus?method=6
 

CoolTrick

Banned
To make sense of viruses not being living, you can't think of it as "well why WOULDN'T they be alive", it is that they do not have all the characteristics that a living thing should have. For example, one of them, I believe, is that they cannot grow. Another is that they cannot reproduce on their own. It is these technicalities (and a few others I can't remember off the top of my head) that prevent viruses from being actually classed as living things.
 
But to be a zombie, technically you'd have to be dead first... or 2nd. What would you call something that's never been truly dead or alive?! AAAAAH!

*jumps out window*
 

Phoenix

Member
I'd be more inclined to say they are a 'different' form of life myself. I'm sure once we get off this rock and start to explore the universe our definition of life will mature significantly.
 

Lord Error

Insane For Sony
Compared to Prions, Viruses are easy to classify as alive.

Prions don't even have all the basic building blocks of what consitutes life. They have no DNA, they are basically just protein, which for some reason decided to become infectuous and deadly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom