-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
NFL WEEK 10: The End of Stupid Subtitles
- Thread starter Matlock
- Start date
- Status
ABC didnt show this. I thought I saw Parcells snub Reid after the game, maybe this was why.
They beat the hell out of us, I never said they didnt. I dont even dislike the Steelers and reserve the right to root for them if they are in the superbowl and we arent. Duce is the man.
TheDuce22 said:
I think Philly is a great team, where I disagree is the part where Pittsburgh wasn't as good as they looked. Honestly, you should get used to seeing this because we are only going to get better as the season goes along. Just imagine where we will be when Duce comes back.
Anyways, even though the Steelers are the better team imho, anyone with any Football IQ would admit that the Eagles have a better chance of reaching the Superbowl then the Steelers or New England, just because the NFC blows.
I'm gonna have to agree with FMT on the Falcons D.
I've only seen one Falcons game in its entirety, but I've seen parts of three others. Much like the Packers did to us in week 1, the Falcons got ALL their pressure against us via the blitz. I think they DO have a good D line however, and their number 6 ranking vs the run (even giving up 8 rushing TDs vs the Chiefs) is legit. However, their sacks come via the blitz, not a 3-4 man rush like the Panthers had last year.
The Falcons biggest change has been their change from 3-4 to 4-3 in the off-season. It's freed some linemen that were too small for their positions the past couple of years to go into their natural positions. Their D is merely adequate, and their failure against the pass both necessitates their blitzing and is exposed by their blitzing. They are 30th vs the pass btw.
I've only seen one Falcons game in its entirety, but I've seen parts of three others. Much like the Packers did to us in week 1, the Falcons got ALL their pressure against us via the blitz. I think they DO have a good D line however, and their number 6 ranking vs the run (even giving up 8 rushing TDs vs the Chiefs) is legit. However, their sacks come via the blitz, not a 3-4 man rush like the Panthers had last year.
The Falcons biggest change has been their change from 3-4 to 4-3 in the off-season. It's freed some linemen that were too small for their positions the past couple of years to go into their natural positions. Their D is merely adequate, and their failure against the pass both necessitates their blitzing and is exposed by their blitzing. They are 30th vs the pass btw.
soulja224466
Member
TheDuce22 said:
I saw TO drop a handful of easy passes in that baltimore game.
after last week's game, even more panthers are injured:
Jake Delhomme (still able to play but apparently broke a bone in his thumb)
John Kasay (the kicker, out with a hamstring injury)
and someone else on the defense
Carolina's team photos now would probably look more like a hospital ward.
Jake Delhomme (still able to play but apparently broke a bone in his thumb)
John Kasay (the kicker, out with a hamstring injury)
and someone else on the defense
Carolina's team photos now would probably look more like a hospital ward.
Wellington said:
:lol
For the time that I was really interested in football (high school), I was a huge Steelers fan. I just kinda got hyped on the Browns because of:
a) The area I moved to
b) The hope that jGar would pull some magic out of his ass
Of course, now that the afterglow has faded, and I found out I got fucked, I'm just trying to figure out what went wrong. And don't get me started on the Bengals, jesus christ. If either the Browns or the Bengals are good in a given year, I'll gladly hype 'em up, but man oh man does Ohio football suck ass this year.
Wellington
BAAAALLLINNN'
The Browns aren't that bad though. The combination of Lee Suggs and Willie Green is awesome. It's just that... their defense... :lol
Our defense blitzes sure, but it's not as much as people on here are making it out to be and being someone who has watched every game we have played in there entirety, I know for a fact our pressure mostly comes from the middle.
Ok let me restate, I think we have enough offense to keep pace with both the Eagles and Pats based on some of the games they have played so far.
The argument really ain't about if our defense as whole is one of the top defenses, it's about our D-Line and I think they have shown they are among the best in the league.
Ok let me restate, I think we have enough offense to keep pace with both the Eagles and Pats based on some of the games they have played so far.
The argument really ain't about if our defense as whole is one of the top defenses, it's about our D-Line and I think they have shown they are among the best in the league.
FrenchMovieTheme
Member
i think there are only 3 legitimately dangerous players on the falcons offense: vick, crumpler and dunn. everyone else basically falls into one of the following categories:
1. average
2. inconsistent
3. terrible
hate to rain on your parade TM, but time will prove me right. falcons will likely be one and done this year in the playoffs (depending on the matchup, they will get to the divisional at best) YOU CAN QUOTE ME ON THIS LADIES! and bring up the thread come playoff time so i can savor my psychic abilities!
1. average
2. inconsistent
3. terrible
hate to rain on your parade TM, but time will prove me right. falcons will likely be one and done this year in the playoffs (depending on the matchup, they will get to the divisional at best) YOU CAN QUOTE ME ON THIS LADIES! and bring up the thread come playoff time so i can savor my psychic abilities!
- Status