The_Darkest_Red
Member
Okay eznark, I know this is a waste of time but it's kind of fun so I'll keep at it for a little while longer.
Looking at the past 10 SB champs, if you look at their season prior to winning the SB they were an average of 11-5, and none of them had a losing record (although the 2008 Saints came kind of close at 8-8). The 2003 Patriots are the only team included in this that won a SB since they won back to back in '03 and '04.
So is it just a coincidence that all of these teams had good records during their seasons of "irrelevance"? Or is it more likely that they were a team that had been built up over a period of multiple seasons in order to get to the point where they could compete for a championship?
Looking at the past 10 SB champs, if you look at their season prior to winning the SB they were an average of 11-5, and none of them had a losing record (although the 2008 Saints came kind of close at 8-8). The 2003 Patriots are the only team included in this that won a SB since they won back to back in '03 and '04.
So is it just a coincidence that all of these teams had good records during their seasons of "irrelevance"? Or is it more likely that they were a team that had been built up over a period of multiple seasons in order to get to the point where they could compete for a championship?