abstract alien
Member
Hard to blame them, but maybe issues like this will adjust their sails and push them towards more powerful and secure hardware.
Eh, probably not.
Eh, probably not.
That's what I never understand aswell.I don't get people who think Nintendo has no rights to its own software. It doesn't matter if you can't handle 20fps, 15, or 5. You're playing their software illegally and nothing you can say justifies that, at least acknowledge that and don't give yourself excuses.
I have no idea if they have a case or not.
Nintendo just had Alanah Pearce suspended from Twitch mid-stream for watching Nintendo-approved preview footage of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom.I don't get people who think Nintendo has no rights to its own software. It doesn't matter if you can't handle 20fps, 15, or 5. You're playing their software illegally and nothing you can say justifies that, at least acknowledge that and don't give yourself excuses.
Nintendo can just FUCK OFF with their abysmal and overpriced hardware and $70 prices for horribly compromized games with 20 FPS caps. It's their own effin' fault for not making modern home only and traditional console with 4K support. People should not pay $70 for horrible experience just cuz you refuse to give a better one, hense they must be free to do whatever they want with what they bought to get it without your effin' permission, you greedy fucks! So, FUCK OFF, eat shit and leave people and emulation scene alone! JFC, man...
P.S. Same goes for people making their own games and remakes based on Zelda, Metroid etc. and without asking people for money and not having any plans to commercialize their work for profit.
Nintendo can just FUCK OFF with their abysmal and overpriced hardware and $70 prices for horribly compromized games with 20 FPS caps. It's their own effin' fault for not making modern home only and traditional console with 4K support. People should not pay $70 for horrible experience just cuz you refuse to give a better one, hense they must be free to do whatever they want with what they bought to get it without your effin' permission, you greedy fucks! So, FUCK OFF, eat shit and leave people and emulation scene alone! JFC, man...
P.S. Same goes for people making their own games and remakes based on Zelda, Metroid etc. and without asking people for money and not having any plans to commercialize their work for profit.
Do you seriously expect people who play on Switch to even know what MAME is, not even talking about whatever obscure arcade board ?So people spend 40K dollars a year to help Ryujinx and Yuzu but Mamedevs struggle to buy and dump cards.
They lost but they bullied the team out of business with continous pursuit of legal action. Could be Nintendo's approach here.Cases like this already went to court a couple of times in the late 90's with Sony. And Sony lost. Some might remember Bleem!
They lost but they bullied the team out of business with continous pursuit of legal action. Could be Nintendo's approach here.
About emulation, people are usually hypocrite: they said emulation is for preservation, but they can't explain why the same people are interested to preserve commercial games easily and already available and not obscure cards for MAME. So people spend 40K dollars a year to help Ryujinx and Yuzu but Mamedevs struggle to buy and dump cards.
People don't want to preserve Switch, people want to play the last Zelda and make excuses to justify things they are not supposed to do.
Like:
-Games are so expensive, and my son is soooo annoying
-I already gave them money at the movie theaters, I deserve my cam rip in VHS, fuck off greedy companies
-95% of my file can be transfered with a floppy, but now I need a CDROM drive, there are chances in the future I could produce totally original huge files...
When your main market is almost piracy, it's difficult to say your product is not for piracy. Let's not pretend Napster, Kazaa and company didn't disappear after they went legal.
We're having this discussion ever since the Bleem! days.About emulation, people are usually hypocrite: they said emulation is for preservation, but they can't explain why the same people are interested to preserve commercial games easily and already available and not obscure cards for MAME. So people spend 40K dollars a year to help Ryujinx and Yuzu but Mamedevs struggle to buy and dump cards.
People don't want to preserve Switch, people want to play the last Zelda and make excuses to justify things they are not supposed to do.
Like:
-Games are so expensive, and my son is soooo annoying
-I already gave them money at the movie theaters, I deserve my cam rip in VHS, fuck off greedy companies
-95% of my file can be transfered with a floppy, but now I need a CDROM drive, there are chances in the future I could produce totally original huge files...
When your main market is almost piracy, it's difficult to say your product is not for piracy. Let's not pretend Napster, Kazaa and company didn't disappear after they went legal.
We're having this discussion ever since the Bleem! days.
If you own a legal copy of the game you have the right to backup said copy and use it via emulation you see fit. I buy every game I emulate because I like to pay for games I love. I want to play the games I own with better controller, better resolution and better sound. With Xbox/PS I have PC ports and plethora of emulators. With Nintendo the only way to play, say, a lot of N64 games w/o emulation is to buy a used N64. Wii U and Wii doesn't count since the store and virtual console are dead.
Piracy is whole another can of worms, but you should ban ISO tools too if we're following that logic.
Yup. But that's a lot of 'ifs'.I think everyone accepts playing your own backups is legit, the grey area for emulation these days is whether the emulator used is reverse engineered or not and requires a bios etc. PCSX2 for example requires a bios, which your are supposed to get from your own PS2 (simple enough if you have free mcboot) Using someone else's bios and not even owning the console is where the illegality of the emulation comes in I guess
Well they do hold some of the worlds most valuable IP. That wouldn’t be the case if they didn’t protect it.Can anyone make the argument that Nintendo's litigiousness has materially benefited them?
Of course it will if they release new games on PC.But you do understand that will kill off their business model of also profiting from Hardware.
I don't even care about Zelda but this post has encouraged me to pirate it anyway.Nintendo can just FUCK OFF with their abysmal and overpriced hardware and $70 prices for horribly compromized games with 20 FPS caps. It's their own effin' fault for not making modern home only and traditional console with 4K support. People should not pay $70 for horrible experience just cuz you refuse to give a better one, hense they must be free to do whatever they want with what they bought to get it without your effin' permission, you greedy fucks! So, FUCK OFF, eat shit and leave people and emulation scene alone! JFC, man...
P.S. Same goes for people making their own games and remakes based on Zelda, Metroid etc. and without asking people for money and not having any plans to commercialize their work for profit.
Oof.I always thought the argument for emulators and emulation was a bit like what the pro-gun lobby does.
dumb takeI always thought the argument for emulators and emulation was a bit like what the pro-gun lobby does.
"Guns are literally designed to shoot (ie injure or kill) living things!"
met with
"Pfft! Nothing wrong with guns, totally legal. I shoot watermelons in my yard for no apparent reason and collect a bunch of 50 cal machine guns because I feel like it. Not our a fault a few basket cases go and shoot up a school"
"Emulators are literally designed to (and developed on an ongoing basis to optimally) play games from a certain device on another device!"
met with
"Pfft! Nothing wrong with emulation, totally legal. Look at these absolutely dogshit homebrew games I played for a whole 30 seconds. Not our fault a few spotty kids pirated the entire Nintendo DS library onto an R4 flash cart and never actually bought any games because they didn't need to"
I'll gladly admit to emulating here and there. Mainly I emulate BOTW on CEMU (I do actually own it on Switch) because it looks and runs like shit on the Switch itself, but I'm under no illusion that it's probably not 100% legal.
When i buy a game, i sign a contract with the company / store selling the physical medium which holds a permanent license for the software, which is hardware locked to operate on a specific device.When you buy a game, you sign a contract were Nintendo let you play games on a specific hardware.
Not in Europe. If I own the game, It's legal to export the iso and play it with an emulator. You, or Nintendo can't change that. It's not excuse, it's the state of the law.I don't get people who think Nintendo has no rights to its own software. It doesn't matter if you can't handle 20fps, 15, or 5. You're playing their software illegally and nothing you can say justifies that, at least acknowledge that and don't give yourself excuses.
I have no idea if they have a case or not.
EhmWhen i buy a game, i sign a contract with the company / store selling the physical medium which holds a permanent license for the software, which is hardware locked to operate on a specific device.
At no point do i sign a contract with nintendo. And they cant revoke that license without taking the physical medium from me.
Now digital is slightly different.
Yup. But that's a lot of 'ifs'.
Emulation and key dumping is legal. The way you use them (for piracy or backups) is up to you. But same could be said about a car or a kitchen knife. It's an empty discussion.
The thing about a car and kitchen knife is that those are used for legit purposes by a vast majority of people, it's only a small number that will use them for illegal purposes. Can you say that with emulation software or hell, p2p filesharing software? That the vast majority are using it for legal purposes and not for piracy?
I won’t dive into details because this whole argument is tired af, but did you know that p2p tech is used mainly for legit video streaming and even online gaming, right?The thing about a car and kitchen knife is that those are used for legit purposes by a vast majority of people, it's only a small number that will use them for illegal purposes. Can you say that with emulation software or hell, p2p filesharing software? That the vast majority are using it for legal purposes and not for piracy?
PS Mini by Sony is running on an open-source PSX emulator for god’s sake!Software emulation is used all over the place in commercial software even outside their respective console like the megaman collection on Xbox and the old castlevania collection on PS4 or even all the DosBox ports on Steam, or should we count all of these out to just leave the “dirty ones” out?
PS Mini by Sony is running on an open-source PSX emulator for god’s sake!
You tell that multi-billion dollar corporation whose boss. Yell at Sony and Microsoft next please regarding their overpriced hardware in non-US countries.Nintendo can just FUCK OFF with their abysmal and overpriced hardware and $70 prices for horribly compromized games with 20 FPS caps. It's their own effin' fault for not making modern home only and traditional console with 4K support. People should not pay $70 for horrible experience just cuz you refuse to give a better one, hense they must be free to do whatever they want with what they bought to get it without your effin' permission, you greedy fucks! So, FUCK OFF, eat shit and leave people and emulation scene alone! JFC, man...
P.S. Same goes for people making their own games and remakes based on Zelda, Metroid etc. and without asking people for money and not having any plans to commercialize their work for profit.
There have been cases shown that you can circumvent encryption for personal use. Keys are extracted by users themselves. Keytool allows users to run it and it doesn't store/hold keys.I think Nintendo would probably win in court. I think the chances would be slim that a court would find that you own any of the actual software that powers your console, including keys stored on it, or that you have the right to use that software in a way that circumvents the EULA. If these folks had clean room reversed engineered the entire process, including creating and validating keys, I think Nintendo would lose. But since it relies on keys Nintendo created being used for something other than their intended purpose I think Nintendo has a case.
Frame drops on plenty of Switch games have been pretty bad. Same with resolution.I don't think Nintendo has released a game with a 20fps cap since the N64 days, lol.
After that stupid Kotaku article near to the TotK release I was expecting Nintendo doing something about.
Can anyone make the argument that Nintendo's litigiousness has materially benefited them?
Emulation is legal yes but playing devils advect here. What if Nintendo can prove that emulation is mostly use for piracy against their games?
It would be interesting to see what an IP lawyer would have to say, that's for sure.There have been cases shown that you can circumvent encryption for personal use. Keys are extracted by users themselves. Keytool allows users to run it and it doesn't store/hold keys.
That said, I am no lawyer. Ooh, I will talk to an IP lawyer at work instead. Somebody should pitch Legal Eagle on YouTube to do an episode around this.
It would be interesting to see what an IP lawyer would have to say, that's for sure.
Yes that is why countries banned them.What if I can prove you that guns are mostly used to kill people?
Would you prohibite it's use?