Mr Moose
Member
9060XT/3600, 32GB RAM.What type of shit computer must you have? The game can run on toasters
(medium preset)

Last edited:
9060XT/3600, 32GB RAM.What type of shit computer must you have? The game can run on toasters
Isn't that against the rules?You are making a thread about your own Video?![]()
I knew it was coming, but I was still suprised. Fully commited and over the top. Thank you for your service, I needed a good laugh.Never drink and post. Read the first few posts and you'll get the idea.
Not really. If it's done in good faith and not with the sole purpose of inflating your views, it have been tolerated. Other prominent members have also done it, when the discussion is relevant to gaf community. It's not likeI through that's was prohibited here…![]()
Holy shit that might be one of the best posts I've read on hereNever drink and post. Read the first few posts and you'll get the idea.
I think they are suing about other stuff too like the ability to ride the monsters.Isn't it about the patent on the damn pokeballs? That's the last I heard about this.
I dont care for Pokemon nor Palworld but any idiot could see Palword was a blatant copy of Pokemon. Nintendo wouldve been an idiot to let that fly.
The concept is derived from Pokemon, yes. Games have done that before. Every genre clone, including every Souls-like from the past decade, exists solely because of an existing product.The resemblance to Pokemon is what sold this game, lets be realistic.
It would be nothing otherwise. Nobody would even know about its existence.
Spoiler: you cannot patent a game mechanic.I dont care for Pokemon nor Palworld but any idiot could see Palword was a blatant copy of Pokemon. Nintendo wouldve been an idiot to let that fly.
Isn't that literally what this suit is about though? Palworld is being sued for using game mechanic(s) such as 'throwing Pokeballs', which Nintendo has indeed patented.Spoiler: you cannot patent a game mechanic.
Aiming a capture item (Poké Ball) at a character placed on the field (Pokémon), releasing the capture item in a direction determined by player input, judgment of whether capturing is successful or not upon contact between the capture item and Pokémon, and changing of the Pokémon's status to "owned by the player" when capturing is successful. In addition, the patent also covers the mechanic of having capture probability displayed to the player, regardless of whether it uses colors, graphics or numbers.
Yes, and that's why this suit has no merit. Nintendo can TRY to patent it, they can have their patent granted even and yet the court can toss it out, as happened in EA vs. Edge.Isn't that literally what this suit is about though? Palworld is being sued for using game mechanic(s) such as 'throwing Pokeballs', which Nintendo has indeed patented.
I mean it's one thing to sue Pocketpair and Palworld because you think they violate your patents even if said patents are some of the most vague gameplay mechanics you could possible imagine. It's another thing to amend the patents mid lawsuit to try to strengthen their case when Pocketpair basically proves the patents should have never been granted in the first place as the patents weren't novel or unique. But Nintendo has to Nintendo lol
Oh okay, yeah. Agreed.Yes, and that's why this suit has no merit. Nintendo can TRY to patent it, they can have their patent granted even and yet the court can toss it out, as happened in EA vs. Edge.
Nintendo amending the patent during ongoing litigation tells you all it needs as how much they are confident in this lol.
A Tarô vs Shinichi I'd sayDefinitely a David vs Goliath fight here.
You misspelled basedYou sound biased.
Isnt LotR nemesis system WB patent and no one eles can use ?Spoiler: you cannot patent a game mechanic.
Nintendo is a lawyer company that just happens to also make videogames on the side.You'd think a company confident in it's strengths, innovative capabilities and IPs wouldn't behave like this. Why fight over so little with so much public attention and cost on every level? Ridiculous. Becomes very apparent when you compare it to other big companies with global IPs.
It was granted because it's a system, a collection of many mechanics that work together to create something novel. It still shouldn't have been granted, but that has more merit than throwing a fucking ballIsnt LotR nemesis system WB patent and no one eles can use ?
Nintendo dosent give a shit since their fans base ll defende any bad pratice or scummy thing they do.You'd think a company confident in it's strengths, innovative capabilities and IPs wouldn't behave like this. Why fight over so little with so much public attention and cost on every level? Ridiculous. Becomes very apparent when you compare it to other big companies with global IPs.
Video game patents are BS, in general. Stand down, Nintendo.
Exactly. Imagine an industry where such simple mechanics obtain patents. The industry would be choked out and you'd just have companies owning the concept of entire genres or simple mechanics just because they couldPocketpair have all my support in this.
Gameplay patents are fucking awful.
Isn't that literally what this suit is about though? Palworld is being sued for using game mechanic(s) such as 'throwing Pokeballs', which Nintendo has indeed patented.
![]()
You would have to get your head out of Nintendo's ass to see that OP has been doing that for years, notably for retro gaming.I through that's was prohibited here…![]()