TheMoon
Member
Hmm, the specifics of that footage are not known I think. As in, was that Mario game really running on the Switch? Can we infer the status of the 3D Mario game from just that?
Do any of these matter, though?
Hmm, the specifics of that footage are not known I think. As in, was that Mario game really running on the Switch? Can we infer the status of the 3D Mario game from just that?
The gimmick of NSMBU was having the best level design in the series and some of the best in the entire genre. It's gimmick was that it was an absolutely stellar 2D platformer. To me that was more than enough.I wonder if people would been a little more receptive to NSMBU had A. Nintendo not called it "New Super Mario Bros." and B. NSMB2 not being a thing that also came out in the same exact year.
See, NSMB DS and Wii were exciting novelties when they first came out for multiple reasons. NSMB was the first 2D Mario game we got in nearly 14 years, and NSMB Wii was the first console 2D Mario game in 19 years when it came out. NSMB Wii also notably greatly expanded the scope of its gameplay from the first game, introducing new concepts to the series like four player co-op and more interesting and complex level designs, as well as the inclusion of new power ups and bringing Yoshi into the mix.
NSMB 2 and U just didn't really have that same "wow" factor unfortunately. They just felt like NSMB games made for the sake of having more NSMB games. They didn't really have anything that substantial other than some throwaway features like the gamepad platform gimmick and the coin collecting stuff. If there's one series at Nintendo that screams for a big mixup/overhaul, it's New Super Mario Bros.
People say a lot of things at E3. We should keep in mind that they are in full PR mode, have to talk to people everyday for 12 hours, and everything they're saying has to be translated and reported to various sites. Who knows what he meant or if he even meant it.
I still believe the "you can go straight to the final boss" comment from Aonuma will be mostly bullshit too. People ran with it, but who knows what the context was?
Point is, we shouldn't take everything said during the E3 craze so seriously.
That history's over. They sell about the same now.Now that I think about it, maybe Miyamoto was talking about a new 2D Mario game there.
2D Mario games have had a history of outselling 3D Mario games. NSMBWii was basically the reason the Wii dominated the Christmas of 2009. So perhaps that might be their big holiday title....
You mean delayed again right? 2015, 2016, 2017.How can Zelda be delayed when it was only given a 2017 release date...
What are the chances the Switch will play 3DS games? Either as downloadable via the eshop or directly off the cart? I know it's probably very slim but at the same time it would be a huge plus in my book as I'll probably never touch my 3DS again after picking up the Switch.
Using the same mediocre soundtrack for four games in a row burnt up a lot of good will. Art style and world sequence (grass, dessert, water, ice...) too, to a lesser degree.Dinoman said:NSMB 2 and U just didn't really have that same "wow" factor unfortunately. They just felt like NSMB games made for the sake of having more NSMB games. They didn't really have anything that substantial other than some throwaway features like the gamepad platform gimmick and the coin collecting stuff. If there's one series at Nintendo that screams for a big mixup/overhaul, it's New Super Mario Bros.
I really don't think both Zelda and Mario will be at launch - cannibalizes too many third parties. But they can be close together. Like Zelda in March and Mario in May, for example.
We've been told it's not backwards compatible.
Emily has a bit more info on the 3D Mario game.
"I don't know if there's a hub world, but this new 3D Mario on Switch has more exploration than 3D World and Galaxy."
I cant imagine two months for 3D Mario launch hype though, maybe they will have it by May or June
Emily has a bit more info on the 3D Mario game.
"I don't know if there's a hub world, but this new 3D Mario on Switch has more exploration than 3D World and Galaxy."
Since I am not very familiar with these games, could someone who has played Jak & Daxter: the Precursor Legacy maybe tell me if that game would be a good indicator for the openness of this game? Like, how open were Galaxy and 3D World in comparison?
Emily has a bit more info on the 3D Mario game.
"I don't know if there's a hub world, but this new 3D Mario on Switch has more exploration than 3D World and Galaxy."
Never played Jak & Daxter but I know it's supposed to be a big open 3D platformer along the lines of Banjo-Kazooie.
Galaxy's levels were pretty linear but there was some open space every now and then. Galaxy 2 and 3D World's levels were all super linear for the most part.
What are the chances the Switch will play 3DS games? Either as downloadable via the eshop or directly off the cart? I know it's probably very slim but at the same time it would be a huge plus in my book as I'll probably never touch my 3DS again after picking up the Switch.
The context was always there. Once your off the Plateau, you can go straight to the final boss. To get off the Plateau, you must complete the first 4 shrines. It's extremely straight forward.
So once you're off the plateau you can just go straight to the castle guarded by four giant pillars and kill Ganon? I'm sure there's more to it than that. It's probably true that you can bypass a big chunk of the game to complete it, I just don't buy the "straight to the final boss" sentiment.
Emily has a bit more info on the 3D Mario game.
"I don't know if there's a hub world, but this new 3D Mario on Switch has more exploration than 3D World and Galaxy."
people really shouldn't be attached to what miyamoto said. He said that we would see mario in the next e3 or two. He just said that to throw us off. As soon as mario was shown on the switch, anything he said about that is no longer valid.
I'm sorry, but why do people keep bringing this up? He is not obligated to tell you the truthWhat the hell, I thought Miyamoto told people to maybe look forward to 3D Mario footage at E3 2017 and now it's a launch title?
People got to be kidding with thinking Nintendo should launch the Switch with both Zelda and Mario simultaniously. That doesn't make sense under any circumstance.
People got to be kidding with thinking Nintendo should launch the Switch with both Zelda and Mario simultaneously. That doesn't make sense under any circumstance.
I mean, it does if we're in some magic world where they have a ton of other equally high quality software for the rest of the year.
That, however, is borderline, if not entirely, impossible.
Hmm, the specifics of that footage are not known I think. As in, was that Mario game really running on the Switch? Can we infer the status of the 3D Mario game from just that?
Mario is a holiday title. Zero doubt about it. Even if it's completed in time for a March release, it won't be a launch title.
FWIW, Eurogamer indicated prior to the Switch trailer being shown that part of the reason for its delay was to get the new Mario running better so it could be shown as such in the trailer. This leads me to believe the status if development or optimization is tied to the footage we saw. It would be unusual to delay just for a tech demo, and as others have said it would be unusual for a tech demo to feature Mario in a brand-new setting rather than a familiar one. And finally, since we know a new Mario game is in development, it's reasonable to assume this might be that game. The above leads me to conclude the game is in development, though it's impossible to know how far along, and that the footage in the commercial is representative og the product in development. Even if none of the above is true, were likely to see 2D and/or 3D Mario games in the next couple years at the latest,e especially 3D since that team hasn't released a major product in a longer amount of time since the 2D Mario team has (I believe that team worked on SMM).
Question, has Nintendo held back a release THAT long?
Like, something like Tropical Freeze was held back even when it was done, but Retro had essentially finished it in late 2013, so it was really only delayed for a couple of months, no big deal. If Mario gets completed by March, would they really hold back on it for that long? Like, delaying it into summer is one thing, but nearly a whole year?
Then again, when was Breath of the Wild finished? Has it been finished?
Mario is a holiday title. Zero doubt about it. Even if it's completed in time for a March release, it won't be a launch title.
I am warming up to the idea of launching with Mario and pushing Zelda back to the Holiday.
It might be the better strategy, if both games are ready...
I am warming up to the idea of launching with Mario and pushing Zelda back to the Holiday.
It might be the better strategy, if both games are ready...
It is true that most assumed it to be a launch game due to amiibo release date listing and such.
No. Zelda has all the momentum right nowI am warming up to the idea of launching with Mario and pushing Zelda back to the Holiday.
It might be the better strategy, if both games are ready...
I am warming up to the idea of launching with Mario and pushing Zelda back to the Holiday.
It might be the better strategy, if both games are ready...
Woah wait. Didn't they already confirm a March release or is my mind playing tricks on me again?
And the reason is?
I am warming up to the idea of launching with Mario and pushing Zelda back to the Holiday.
It might be the better strategy, if both games are ready...
I am warming up to the idea of launching with Mario and pushing Zelda back to the Holiday.
It might be the better strategy, if both games are ready...
I am warming up to the idea of launching with Mario and pushing Zelda back to the Holiday.
It might be the better strategy, if both games are ready...
Question, has Nintendo held back a release THAT long?
Like, something like Tropical Freeze was held back even when it was done, but Retro had essentially finished it in late 2013, so it was really only delayed for a couple of months, no big deal. If Mario gets completed by March, would they really hold back on it for that long? Like, delaying it into summer is one thing, but nearly a whole year?
Then again, when was Breath of the Wild finished? Has it been finished?