LIsten i'm not arguing semantics , i'm arguing simple facts.
You really are arguing semantics. You're trying to insist on how a very specific usage of the term BS is not applicable when I have already stated I'm referencing an alternative definition. We do not really disagree on the facts in any sense (as evidence by my lack of refutation to your assertions of the fight being fair), you're just disagreeing with my application of the term.
Like you haven't talked at all about what make this fight unfun aside from the minions except that unblockable attack that is telegraphed by the game.
Yeah it's unfun for you ..Aside from your hate of fights with minions , we've got no info at all so your argument , your talk of "unfun" feel flat
I did mention it in this post, but before I posted, I edited it down because I didn't think they were terribly important. It started from "The mechanics are obvious" part, and it just combined with the part how I get what the suggestions to counter the boss. But fine, I'll expand:
Without the minions, what are you left with? You have this aesthetically hideous boss (and there are
plenty of ways to make it look interesting). You might think this is a nitpick, but I'm big on enemies looking interesting. Similar, the music isn't good. And the death trap arena isn't a cool place to be in. The presentation of the fight is just not that great in general and makes it uninteresting that has merely 4 attacks all of which are pretty easy to dodge because they are EXTREMELY slow. However, he has an extremely long healthbar because the only way to do meaningful damage to him is to hit his glowy bits. But those only appear in situations after he attacks. So, that means you have have to wait on his slow ass to use his pathetically easy to anticipate attacks to do meaningful damage. And since he's a giant blob, his position is entirely stationary aside from when he jumps to one side or another. In a game about fast paced action, this is slamming on the breaks. It means I have to wait on him and be reactive instead active if I want to do effective damage. Fire enhancement only shortens the duration of this dilemma, it doesn't change it that you're either aggressively chipping away at a boulder or you're waiting on him to for those solid moments to inflict big damage. Either way, the fight just draaaags because the interaction with him isn't interesting or engaging, and nothing I see written can really address the problem of this design of the boss.
I hope that answers you're question, but now I have mine: What do you think you're going to do with this information? You now have a more elaborate version of my opinion, but it is still just my opinion. The opening of this discussion when I started it wasn't an argument, it was a commentary. There's nothing for you to prove or disprove. You wanted to know why I thought it was unfun in greater detail, and now you do, but whats the next step? Try to argue how it actually is fun to me? Or maybe how it was fun to you? It's not that you can't or shouldn't, but there's nothing to argue over, as you seem to think. Argument is a part of discussion, of course, but that doesn't mean all discussions are arguments, and this one wasn't. This was me putting down my thoughts and frustration. It's not the same thing as something that I invite you to try an disprove. Or even me, for that matter. Perhaps it's not much for you to work with that all I say "it's not fun", but there isn't an inherent necessity that you have to work with it at all. Worst case scenerio, it just becomes an idle comment that goes unreplied to, like hundreds on this forum, in this very threat probably. I have posts where I want people to come in and argue with me, but that doesn't mean every post is of that nature. Sometimes it's enough for a discussion to go "I thought this fight was BS" "I didn't think so. It's cool because of the approaches you can do with it." "That's cool, but it was still just unenjoyable for me" "That's a shame" and have it end there. (and to be clear, it's not that I'm discouraging discussion. I'm just saying that htis wasn't me trying to make an argument)