Pilgrimzero
Member
Been reading the original Rambo novel aka First Blood. Very tonally different.
Rambo is not sympatric at all like in the film. Where as the Sheriff and his men are.
Yeah the Sheriff arrested him for being a long haired vagrant but gave him 3 chances to leave town and Rambo just acted like an asshole.
And when Rambo does finally decide to fight back, its without mercy. In the film 2 men die by indirect action on Rambo's part. In the book he's shooting people in the face, gutting men, and just being the monster in a monster movie. Think Predator before that film existed. It very much plays up that he's the best guerilla fighter the military produced vs a bunch of cops and weekend warriors. The Sheriff isnt blame or guilt free and both men have egos. Difference is Rambo is a murder machine or as he sees it "a warrior" and always choices fighting.. but htats what the military made him.
And when Trautman shows up, he's only in awe at how well his "boy" is doing. There is no sympathy for either sides plight. He's very objective.
I'm almost done with it and I know the ending is different, it would have to be because again Rambo is not the hero of this book like the film, he's the monster.
MY only nitpicks are that Rambo falls into "luck" to often. He luckily finds a man willing to give him weapons, even after he admits to killing a cop. The mans motivations aside the fact that Rambo happens upon him at all... Also stuff like, the gun just happens to be modified to help for use at night. A handgun he gets later is also specially modified to be more deadly. The long abandoned mine he hides in still has tools in it... for reasons. Etc.
Over all I've very much enjoyed it, and i think the writer got across his "bringing the war home" and "unstable abused at home Vet" point across fairly clearly. Though again, Rambo and all the others are much different characters.
Rambo is not sympatric at all like in the film. Where as the Sheriff and his men are.
Yeah the Sheriff arrested him for being a long haired vagrant but gave him 3 chances to leave town and Rambo just acted like an asshole.
And when Rambo does finally decide to fight back, its without mercy. In the film 2 men die by indirect action on Rambo's part. In the book he's shooting people in the face, gutting men, and just being the monster in a monster movie. Think Predator before that film existed. It very much plays up that he's the best guerilla fighter the military produced vs a bunch of cops and weekend warriors. The Sheriff isnt blame or guilt free and both men have egos. Difference is Rambo is a murder machine or as he sees it "a warrior" and always choices fighting.. but htats what the military made him.
And when Trautman shows up, he's only in awe at how well his "boy" is doing. There is no sympathy for either sides plight. He's very objective.
I'm almost done with it and I know the ending is different, it would have to be because again Rambo is not the hero of this book like the film, he's the monster.
MY only nitpicks are that Rambo falls into "luck" to often. He luckily finds a man willing to give him weapons, even after he admits to killing a cop. The mans motivations aside the fact that Rambo happens upon him at all... Also stuff like, the gun just happens to be modified to help for use at night. A handgun he gets later is also specially modified to be more deadly. The long abandoned mine he hides in still has tools in it... for reasons. Etc.
Over all I've very much enjoyed it, and i think the writer got across his "bringing the war home" and "unstable abused at home Vet" point across fairly clearly. Though again, Rambo and all the others are much different characters.