Soapbox Killer
Grand Nagus
Hayden could play Dr. Doom.
Who knows what Disney will cherry pick from the old material, but the way old canon went, Darth Vader had hired Boba Fett to hunt down and kill the rebel pilot that destroyed the Death Star. Fett failed, returning only with the pilot's name, Luke Skywalker. At this revelation, Vader knew he had a son and everything changed. He had already chosen to keep this information to himself from Palpatine.
Therefore, during their conversation in ESB, Vader was playing dumb to Palpatine that he hadn't already known. He was already trying to hunt down Luke for the purpose of recruiting him to his cause and killing Palpatine. One Palps found out though, Vader simply continued his task under a new guise.
I think that taking responsibility for Padme's death left a stain on his life and he didn't REALLY want to kill Luke. He'd rather team up. But Luke would literally rather commit suicide than "rule the galaxy as father as son" the same way he pitched it to Padme before. It was this point that Vader became really shaky and set the stage for him to finally go 180 during ROTJ's climax.
The Critical Drinker's review is out. His reviews are some of the best, he's like a classic version of Angry Joe on steroids, except more cynical and mocking. I enjoyed it more than he did, but I found the review hilarious because of his wit, sarcasm, and he does point out the obvious glaring flaws.
The Critical Drinker's review is out.
I'd say he more calls out shows and movies that bring their personal politics into it, rather than bringing his own into it. His "the message" meme I find hilarious.Absolutely hate his reviews and his annoying slurred voice gimmick. He's one of those guys that tries to shove his politics into evey review bit to an extent that he's insufferable. Also makes a ton of borderline sexist comments. I guess I can see why some like him but not for me, I fund him incredibly grating.
To each their own though.
He did way more than I thought they would have for him.Hayden did barely any acting and shouldn't have been hyped up so much.
Third sisters ending was so cringe and predictable, Disney probably going to give her a spin off show. Star Wars has just become a predictable money printer.
Third sisters ending was so cringe and predictable, Disney probably going to give her a spin off show. Star Wars has just become a predictable money printer.
never heard of this guy so i clicked on video... didnt even make it 10 seconds lol.Absolutely hate his reviews and his annoying slurred voice gimmick. He's one of those guys that tries to shove his politics into evey review bit to an extent that he's insufferable. Also makes a ton of borderline sexist comments. I guess I can see why some like him but not for me, I fund him incredibly grating.
To each their own though.
never heard of this guy so i clicked on video... didnt even make it 10 seconds lol.
The Critical Drinker's review is out. His reviews are some of the best, he's like a classic version of Angry Joe on steroids, except more cynical and mocking. I enjoyed it more than he did, but I found the review hilarious because of his wit, sarcasm, and he does point out the obvious glaring flaws.
I've not watched a lot of this guy but in the ones I've seen he does make legit points about the script. We should NOT be letting the showrunners and writers off the hook for these disasters. Obi-Wan fails at narrative storytelling for lots of reasons that any amateur, much less a seasoned and educated scriptwriter, should be able to articulate. How this script got greenlit, or the original film script was allowed to be bastardized into this meandering pointless atrocity, is a hallmark sign of corruption from within. Clearly there are elements at LucasArts firing on all cylinders, the SFX teams are working over time, as are the costumers and set folk when they are allowed to build stuff that won't just be made in CGI. But when the core elements are bad, the story has no point and doesn't know what it wants to say, then its just polishing a turd. Then the director and editors compound the issue with shoddy attempts to trump up failing narrative elements or set pieces never given the pre-production time to look good.He comes across as very dishonest and is just chasing after the easy anti-woke money on YouTube. He basically had no presence on YouTube until he realised how easy it was to make money in his line of work.
He critiques things to high hell in "woke" shows/movies and forgives similar things in what he considers none woke shows/movies. An example being his complaint about Reva's plan relying on conveniences, which is the exact same thing that Palpatine's plan relies on, but you won't hear him complain about that.
I've not watched a lot of this guy but in the ones I've seen he does make legit points about the script. We should NOT be letting the showrunners and writers off the hook for these disasters. Obi-Wan fails at narrative storytelling for lots of reasons that any amateur, much less a seasoned and educated scriptwriter, should be able to articulate. How this script got greenlit, or the original film script was allowed to be bastardized into this meandering pointless atrocity, is a hallmark sign of corruption from within. Clearly there are elements at LucasArts firing on all cylinders, the SFX teams are working over time, as are the costumers and set folk when they are allowed to build stuff that won't just be made in CGI. But when the core elements are bad, the story has no point and doesn't know what it wants to say, then its just polishing a turd. Then the director and editors compound the issue with shoddy attempts to trump up failing narrative elements or set pieces never given the pre-production time to look good.
The Critical Drinker's review is out. His reviews are some of the best, he's like a classic version of Angry Joe on steroids, except more cynical and mocking. I enjoyed it more than he did, but I found the review hilarious because of his wit, sarcasm, and he does point out the obvious glaring flaws.
Agreed. Just finished the finale. Easily the best episode of the 6.
But it doesn't undo the utter shite of the previous 5 episodes, much like how the Darth Maul finale doesn't undo the rest of the Cringe Craptacular that is Episode I.
Now that Reva is a good guy, maybe the role will better fit the actress. Cuz she was plain garbage as a bad guy.
All in all, 5/10, with 3 of those points coming from ep.6.
I'd argue that "strong woman" is more of a trope of lazy screenwriting and characterization than it is a "woke dogwhistle". A male character displaying the EXACT same qualities as Reva would be called out as an example of toxic masculinity, for example. So when I see a female character getting displayed in a certain way and I feel like they going with the "Strong woman" character type then I know how most, if not all, of her interactions are gonna go.I think Obi-Wan is a 6/10 series, the first 4 episodes pissed me off and disappointed me, Leia being captured and rescued twice was a waste of time. Ultimately it should have been a theatrical film with a big budget. Speaking of which, this show felt extremely low budget and amatuer on a technical level multiple times.
I just don't agree with how and why Critical Sphincter is criticising the show. My Reva example above and the usage of anti-woke buzzwords like "strong woman".
This guy triggers you so much it's hilarious. He has plenty of content that talks about things he enjoys. You can critique his complaints all day but you really just come off as a bigger nerd.He comes across as very dishonest and is just chasing after the easy anti-woke money on YouTube. He basically had no presence on YouTube until he realised how easy it was to make money in his line of work.
He critiques things to high hell in "woke" shows/movies and forgives similar things in what he considers none woke shows/movies. An example being his complaint about Reva's plan relying on conveniences, which is the exact same thing that Palpatine's plan relies on, but you won't hear him complain about that.
Obi-Wan is a 2/10 series and I'm saying this as a huge fan of Ewan McGregor Obi-WanI think Obi-Wan is a 6/10 series, the first 4 episodes pissed me off and disappointed me, Leia being captured and rescued twice was a waste of time. Ultimately it should have been a theatrical film with a big budget. Speaking of which, this show felt extremely low budget and amatuer on a technical level multiple times.
I just don't agree with how and why Critical Sphincter is criticising the show. My Reva example above and the usage of anti-woke buzzwords like "strong woman".
There's a reason why Critical Drinker's channel has blown up - he's able to clearly articulate the faults with a lot of the writing in shows like Kenobi. Not to mention logical fallacies that the writers want you to ignore.
Sure he bangs on about 'The Message' a lot, but that's simply a reflection of a lot of the content being produced nowadays, with Disney being at the forefront. Male characters being to made to look weak/broken/ineffective, bossed around by female characters, and a general push for them to be 'put in their place'.
He tells it as he sees it without pandering to any particular groups.
He highly recommended Top Gun which has both.His group is the anti-woke, how can you not see that? His negativity only relates to media that contains minorities or women.
He highly recommended Top Gun which has both.
What? Now love interests MUST be as combative and agrressive as the leads? WTF? So every real life fighter pilot married to a "normal non fighter pilot marine sniper MMA nuclear missile specialist woman" (aka virtually ALL of them) is somehow an alt-right conspiracy to trick Hollywood into not following reality?Maverick is one of my favorite films of the year (along with Everything Everywhere). But to say it contains both is a bit of a disservice, all the women and minority characters are minor or background characters with barely any screen time. And Jennifer Connelly is the typical love interest character, not a leading fighter pilot or anything.
What? Now love interests MUST be as combative and agrressive as the leads? WTF? So every real life fighter pilot married to a "normal non fighter pilot marine sniper MMA nuclear missile specialist woman" (aka virtually ALL of them) is somehow an alt-right conspiracy to trick Hollywood into not following reality?
The fameks and minorities on TGM got as much airtime, if not more, than any itlf the other pilots not named rooster and maverick. Tha k God thye didn't try to gender or race swap goises boy from the first film.
Well maybe that what makes it so great? It was refreshing to see and not everything need to have a minority or women in the lead role.My point is, Jennifer Connelly isn't helping drive the narrative in any way, shape or form, neither are any of the minorities. The 2 leads are white males and the female lead is just a secondary character that we have seen before in hundreds of films in the past. What I'm stating is fact, the female lead and minorities are not driving the narrative, hence it's not the best film to try and present as inclusive.
Well maybe that what makes it so great? It was refreshing to see and not everything need to have a minority or women in the lead role.
The same script with minorities as the leads and a different movie title would still = amazing movie.
It wouldn't have been as successful though
That's true but it's an entirely different thing. No one was predicting Maverick to make a billion dollars though.
I need to watch thatCritical Drinker highly recommends Arcane. It’s full of minorities and women in the most prominent role.
Haven’t watched much of his videos but I did of Arcane since I enjoyed it as well. I’m a League player though so I may be biased on the show but last I heard the show was very popular.
And there's plenty of woke YouTubers you can watch too.His group is the anti-woke, how can you not see that? His negativity only relates to media that contains minorities or women.
It's a shame how so much of criticism, particularly on YouTube, has just become about "woke" critics and "unwoke" critics. The level of media criticism has fallen off of a cliff in recent years. The chase for views has meant the lowest common denominators are appealed to and so you end up with this shallow, simplistic stuff that doesn't provide any meaningful insight to its viewers, just tells them what they want to hear.And there's plenty of woke YouTubers you can watch too.
Also virtually all media contains women and minorities lol. He reviews mainstream TV shows and films so it's pretty hard to avoid.
It's a shame how so much of criticism, particularly on YouTube, has just become about "woke" critics and "unwoke" critics. The level of media criticism has fallen off of a cliff in recent years. The chase for views has meant the lowest common denominators are appealed to and so you end up with this shallow, simplistic stuff that doesn't provide any meaningful insight to its viewers, just tells them what they want to hear.
I haven't heard of them. I'll look them up later, thanks. I just find that so many critics these days don't have the knowledge of the medium to be able to talk about filmmaking elements beyond plot, so not touching on use of colour, editing, framing, sound etc. If I listen to/read a critic I want them to enrich my understanding by them drawing on a greater knowledge pool than I have to provide insight. Or if they can dig deeper into the themes to talk about what the film is actually saying rather than just detailing what happens.I primarily watch Chris Stuckman and Dan Murrell on YouTube for reviews. They jut stick to the plot, characters and directing.
Annnnnd there you have it. All people like you want is visual representation, the actual quality of the script and internal logic of the inclusion be damned.My point is, Jennifer Connelly isn't helping drive the narrative in any way, shape or form, neither are any of the minorities. The 2 leads are white males and the female lead is just a secondary character that we have seen before in hundreds of films in the past. What I'm stating is fact, the female lead and minorities are not driving the narrative, hence it's not the best film to try and present as inclusive.
I haven't heard of them. I'll look them up later, thanks. I just find that so many critics these days don't have the knowledge of the medium to be able to talk about filmmaking elements beyond plot, so not touching on use of colour, editing, framing, sound etc. If I listen to/read a critic I want them to enrich my understanding by them drawing on a greater knowledge pool than I have to provide insight. Or if they can dig deeper into the themes to talk about what the film is actually saying rather than just detailing what happens.
Annnnnd there you have it. All people like you want is visual representation, the actual quality of the script and internal logic of the inclusion be damned.
So by your logic rooster must be of a specific minority and maverick must display a firm allegiance to a lgbt+ group in order for the film to count as inclusive?
Get the F outta here with that divisive bs! And you wonder why folks talk about a checklist for media and how it hampers creativity....
and highly recommended everything everywhere all at once.. a film WITH woman AND minorities.He highly recommended Top Gun which has both.
I don't think he was hyped for his acting, he was hyped for nostalgia. It's JW all over again.Hayden did barely any acting and shouldn't have been hyped up so much.
There, FTFY. I'd say TGM tried really hard to be inclusive, having his black flight test program manager show up on an operational aircraft carrier flight deck with a green vest is a pretty clear attempt to include the character beyond his early role.Did you miss the part where I said it's one of my favourite films of the year? I have no issue with the main cast being white, why would I? Just in my mind it's not an inclusive ]ENOUGH film and it doesn't have to be. Not every film needs to be.
If you look at what Critical Drinker says about Kenobi I think it's bang on the money:It's a shame how so much of criticism, particularly on YouTube, has just become about "woke" critics and "unwoke" critics. The level of media criticism has fallen off of a cliff in recent years. The chase for views has meant the lowest common denominators are appealed to and so you end up with this shallow, simplistic stuff that doesn't provide any meaningful insight to its viewers, just tells them what they want to hear.