SolKane said:How is that ironic?
Most journalists are just college grads with jobs.
SolKane said:How is that ironic?
You seem to be closing in though. New King potentially?coldvein said:interesting. just wanted to check who had the most posts in the drunk thread. unsurprisingly, it is the king himself..
Manos: The Hans of Fate said:You seem to be closing in though. New King potentially?
.ronito said:No end of corporate personhood, no sale.
Unless triumph has become un-permabanned, there can be no king of the drunk thread.coldvein said:interesting. just wanted to check who had the most posts in the drunk thread. unsurprisingly, it is the king himself..
You know, along with their freedom of speech, you'd also get rid of your ability to sue themronito said:No end of corporate personhood, no sale.
no...Slavik81 said:You know, along with their freedom of speech, you'd also get rid of your ability to sue them
Flying_Phoenix said:Occupy Wallstreet should have this as their tagline focus:
"We want to stop Wallstreet from having so much power and influence over us. Because of them nothing that should get done, does get done. We want the nation to have people as once again its primary focus."
Flying_Phoenix said:Demands:
- Redistribution of Wealth (tax these wealthy people)
- More regulation on these businesses (reinstate Glass-Stegal?)
- Stop cutting social programs (we, the people, are suffering here, some of us are on our last legs. Cutting the few things that help us, is unacceptable)
What's wrong with this?
mre said:Unless triumph has become un-permabanned, there can be no king of the drunk thread.
Kevitivity said:Spoken like someone who has never purchased stock or who doesn't have a 401k... I think you need to be directing your anger at lobbyists.
Kevitivity said:What wrong with this? EVERYTHING...
Kevitivity said:For starters, as a country we need to make sure our corporations are competitive on the global economy - that is, if you're interested in growing the economy and creating more jobs.
Kevitivity said:America ALREADY has some of the highest corporate tax rates in the world (see the CBO or Wikipedia). If anything, we need to simplify tax code, get rid of the loopholes, and lower taxes.
Kevitivity said:Second, the redistribution of wealth is an inherently unsavory notion in America where values like personal responsibility, self reliance, and self determination are still widely held.
Kevitivity said:B]***[/B]I'm about to give you one of the most valuable business tips ever in life: When you learn of a corporation making "obscene profits", don't decide to drop out, quit your job, and camp out in the street like a fucking bum. Instead,!!!INVEST IN THAT COMPANY
Kevitivity said:Honestly, I think you really need to be directing your anger at lobbyists... rather than siding with those filthy shitheads down in the gutter.
Flying_Phoenix said:I argued against this? I'm against competitive capitalism? I'm not aware of a global economy? Have you even seen my posts here? Specifically have you seen my posts when it comes to topics of capitalism?
EDIT - Wait was this a point against regulation? Please tell me that it isn't a point against regulation.
Flying_Phoenix said:If you honestly think that this protest is about attacking stock brokers well then that says a lot about you.
Kevitivity said:Who or what are these morons on Wall Street angry at? Does it have anything to do with Wall Street?... Seems like we are falling victim to the fact that no one really knows.
bill gonorrhea said:Its partially about going after rich people.
Kevitivity said:Rather than going after the rich, they should be trying to get rich. And Flying_Phoenix, you don't have to be a stock broker to invest in the market. I started investing before I was out of college with $200 I got from grandma.
Karma Kramer said:holy shit, brilliant idea!
bill gonorrhea said:
So easy all it takes is ... grandparents with money.Kevitivity said:That why these morons "protesting" Wall Srteet look like such, well, morons. Because it really is that easy if you have what it takes.
You started investing with $200? How did commission fees not eat you alive?Kevitivity said:Rather than going after the rich, they should be trying to get rich. And Flying_Phoenix, you don't have to be a stock broker to invest in the market. I started investing before I was out of college with $200 I got from grandma.
travisbickle said:So easy all it takes is ... grandparents with money.
Kevitivity said:That why these morons "protesting" Wall Srteet look like such, well, morons. Because it really is that easy if you have what it takes.
Kevitivity said:Cain is basically right. African Americans have a new master these days... It's called the DNC.
DOO13ER said:Manos did it better.
Oh, and L-O-fucking-L at that last part.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-americas-gone-soft_594623.html"I mean, there are a lot of things we can do," Obama said. "The way I think about it is, you know, this is a great, great country that had gotten a little soft and, you know, we didn't have that same competitive edge that we needed over the last couple of decades. We need to get back on track."
Kevitivity said:Rather than going after the rich, they should be trying to get rich. And Flying_Phoenix, you don't have to be a stock broker to invest in the market. I started investing before I was out of college with $200 I got from grandma.
Yes. If corporations were not legal entities themselves, you'd have to sue their composite shareholders or managers directly.pxleyes said:no...
Oh.... I get it now. You got me. lol.Kevitivity said:Thats right. $200 big ones!
Tristam said:I'll take your advice and become rich as fuck, and then I'll hire you to wipe my ass.
Slavik81 said:Yes. If corporations were not legal entities themselves, you'd have to sue their composite shareholders or managers directly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood#Legislation
Eteric Rice said:My anger is more towards the rich having so many loop holes with taxes and big corporations having so much power over our government and laws.
I mean, the corporate person hood thing plus taking the caps off of donations to politicians is the biggest thing I'm pissed about.
I do think it would be more difficult to sue, but I think the real issue is with your second point. Corporate personhood doesn't grant corporations all the rights of a real person. It only grants rights that courts think make sense to extend to them. For example, privacy rights are not extended to corporations, nor is the right to decline self-incrimination.jorma said:1) it's not like it would be more difficult to sue, and the legislation is not there to make it easier to sue, it's there to protect shareholders from losing more than the stake they've put into the enterprise.
2) It's perfectly possible to have corporate legal entities without granting them all the constitutional rights that should only apply to actual human beings.
Eteric Rice said:My anger is more towards the rich having so many loop holes with taxes and big corporations having so much power over our government and laws.
I mean, the corporate person hood thing plus taking the caps off of donations to politicians is the biggest thing I'm pissed about.
Kevitivity said:If you notice a corporation doing well and expanding, why not buy a few shares rather than complaining? After all, a corporation is basically it's share holders.
Wait, are you familiar with US economics?
G.O.O. said:Kevitivity, you seem to live in a nice fantasy world.
Kevitivity said:It's not a fantasy. It took a lot of hard work, determination, and self reliance - yes, those are dirty words to the left these days. That wasn't always the case... Remember JFK's call to not "ask what your government can do for you..."?
Slavik81 said:I do think it would be more difficult to sue, but I think the real issue is with your second point. Corporate personhood doesn't grant corporations all the rights of a real person. It only grants rights that courts think make sense to extend to them. For example, privacy rights are not extended to corporations, nor is the right to decline self-incrimination.
Your complaint is really that you disagree with the courts over what rights are reasonable to extend to corporations. Specifically enumerating the specifics of that disagreement is important.
Corporate personhood generally encompass both things that reformers want to keep and things that reformers want to throw away. Hence why I feel that simply demanding an end corporate personhood is meaningless, and I think it betrays a lack of understanding of the issue.
I doubt you'd be happy if they were no longer considered persons, but were afforded exactly the same rights as they are now. The objections you'd then raise are the real problems that need voicing.
Karma Kramer said:lol what?
Why would someone buy shares in a corporation that is already too powerful and is affecting laws unfairly through lobbying?
It's naive to believe that someone can succeed just by working hard. Some people have two jobs or more and still struggle to end their month.Kevitivity said:It's not a fantasy. It took a lot of hard work, determination, and self reliance - yes, those are dirty words to the left these days. That wasn't always the case... Remember JFK's call to not "ask what your government can do for you..."?
Kevitivity said:If you notice a corporation doing well and expanding, why not buy a few shares rather than complaining? After all, a corporation is basically it's share holders.
Wait, are you familiar with US economics?
The almighty dollar of course.Karma Kramer said:lol what?
Why would someone buy shares in a corporation that is already too powerful and is affecting laws unfairly through lobbying?
Kevitivity said:It's not a fantasy. It took a lot of hard work, determination, and self reliance - yes, those are dirty words to the left these days. That wasn't always the case... Remember JFK's call to not "ask what your government can do for you..."?
So you're saying all I need to do to beat the market and achieve abnormal returns is buy stock in a corporation which is 'doing well'? Seriously?Kevitivity said:If you notice a corporation doing well and expanding, why not buy a few shares rather than complaining? After all, a corporation is basically it's share holders.
Wait, are you familiar with US economics?
Oh, you're one of those whose beliefs are based on the assumption that we have enough resources available so that everyone can become rich if they just try hard enough.Kevitivity said:That why these morons "protesting" Wall Srteet look like such, well, morons. Because it really is that easy if you have what it takes.