CitizenCope
Member
Making such progress but still worried why these votes aren't both 9-0.
Unfortunately the U.S Supreme Court in Van Order V. Perry that 10 commandments was constitutional based on historical reasons. I don't agree with it and it was a 5-4 split. Curious to see what happens here.
If you make a law that says you can't do it then don't do it is how I see it. Thing is...I don't understand why they made the law? I'm an atheist and don't mind religious stuff out there. It'd be like getting offended at someone saying Merry Christmas or Happy Hannukah instead of Happy Holidays to me.
Way I see it is if you want to let this one rock then just abolish the law and let everyone have permission to put up statues. That'd be my solution honestly...let everyone have a voice instead of either giving one preferential allowances or plain silencing them all. Just let it rock and let em all celebrate what they love. I'm always more for good will towards all than tightening the reigns honestly.
The Bible is also a textbook idol.These two always get me.
No idols please -> Statue of Virgin Mary, Jesus on the Cross, Ten Commandment tablet
Sabbath is broken to hell and back when they change it from Saturday to Sunday
No one could sense the irony of no idol rule when erecting the Ten Commandment explicitly saying so.
Making such progress but still worried why these votes aren't both 9-0.
The Bible is also a textbook idol.
Get it.. "Textbook idol"? Tee hee
Awww I wanted Baphomet erected.
Yeah that's true. I thought about saying Abrahamic but kept it simple.I get where you were going with this but you really should have said non-Abrahamic. The Ten Commandments came from the Jewish scripture. Jews, Christians, and Muslims all worship the same God.
If you make a law that says you can't do it then don't do it is how I see it. Thing is...I don't understand why they made the law? I'm an atheist and don't mind religious stuff out there. It'd be like getting offended at someone saying Merry Christmas or Happy Hannukah instead of Happy Holidays to me.
Way I see it is if you want to let this one rock then just abolish the law and let everyone have permission to put up statues. That'd be my solution honestly...let everyone have a voice instead of either giving one preferential allowances or plain silencing them all. Just let it rock and let em all celebrate what they love. I'm always more for good will towards all than tightening the reigns honestly.
It's not a commandment to people visiting the court or something that has been established within the legal system. It's a purely aesthetic monument that exists because it's a famous set of laws. If they had a monument of the Code of Hammurabi I wouldn't feel compelled at all to follow any of the laws because I would recognise immediately that it's merely a thematically appropriate aesthetic monument.
No public money or property shall ever be appropriated,
applied, donated, or used, directly or indirectly, for the use,
benefit, or support of any sect, church, denomination, or system
of religion, or for the use, benefit, or support of any priest,
preacher, minister, or other religious teacher or dignitary, or
sectarian institution as such.
Since the original monument was erected in 2012, several other groups have asked to put up their own monuments on the Capitol grounds. Among them is a group that wants to erect a 7-foot-tall statue that depicts Satan as Baphomet, a goat-headed figure with horns, wings and a long beard.
But I was looking forward to the Satanic statue that someone asked to be added too.
![]()
This was real, by the way.
Beaten by seconds (and I guess it's Baphomet)
Yup that is Baphomet, a cool looking one by the way.
The Oklahoma ruling specifically says it violates the Oklahoma constitution. Can't wait to see all the people yelling "States Rights" about marriage equality turn a 180.
How does this work? Doesn't the US Constitution always supersede state constitutions?
Yea,
a week after the President of the United Fuckin States went to Church, basically preached, a sermon about God's race and Jesus' awesomeness. Christians UNDER ATTACK.
5. No matter how much he cries, no matter how much he begs, never, never feed your gremlin after midnight.
I literally just had this conversation on FB:
Cousin: I can't believe Oklahoma has folded on this. It's not right. God is basically being removed a little at a time.
Me: It endorses a religion which the state Gov can't legally do.
Cousin: So you are saying you agree with this?
Me: Doesn't matter what i agree with. The law is the law. There is a reason we are a Democracy and not a Theocracy. Our Founding Fathers knew this.
Cousin: It absolutely DOES matter if your agree or not. There is a very small percentage of the public that made this happen. It happened because too many people are afraid to stand up and say something because we have all been turned into sheep and convinced that anything said will be deemed as offensive, racists, bigotry, etc.
Me: How did this small percentage effect THE LAW? This went to the courts, the LEGAL COURTS, who used thier knowledge of THE LAW to say that this is not LEGAL. So are you saying that even if it's illegal as deemed by the PEOPLE who created and voted on these laws (keeping in mind the seperation of church and state) that it should stay there? Would you be just as adamant if it was buddist statue? Or a satanic one? Should the law be changed because it's YOUR religion? Do you understand how that's biased and the reason that law even exists?
Cousin: Pilgrim.....do you believe in God?
Me: Dude, really? If you think this is an attack on religion then there is no need to continue this.
Cousin: You're right. No need to continue. (But I will say a prayer for you).
I WILL PRAY FOR YOU, PILGRIM
I WILL PRAY FOR YOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU! *tear*
How could satan click his hooves if he only has two legs? Wouldn't he have to sit on a really tall chair and / or have tiny little baby legs?I see the War on Christianity continues apace. Do you hear that sound on the wind, wayfarer? It's Satan clicking his hooves.
How does this work? Doesn't the US Constitution always supersede state constitutions?
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
How could satan click his hooves if he only has two legs? Wouldn't he have to sit on a really tall chair and / or have tiny little baby legs?
He clicks his hooves as he jumps for joy.How could satan click his hooves if he only has two legs? Wouldn't he have to sit on a really tall chair and / or have tiny little baby legs?
As someone who does not believe in God or religion those mean absolutely nothing to me. If anything I would look at that monument as an art piece then a religious symbol. I don't understand how people get offended by things they don't believe in, that's like being offended by someone who says they hunt unicorns for sport.
Aren't only like 2 of the 10 actually represented in US law, and the rest are just pure applesauce?
I am so sick of this argument. Why not put the code of Hammurabi up on the lawn? At least its laws are still generally against the law. Of the ten commandments, only TWO are definitively against the law in the US (Shalt not kill, shalt not steal), with a third (shalt not bear false witness) only the law when under oath (eg: perjury). The rest are completely irrelevant to the justice system. I don't know how anybody with half a brain could think this symbol was non-religious and a foundation of western law.
Can't unseeLol, that shadow. Oh my.