Socreges said:Raist, again with this bullshit! :lol
Guys, he's talking about what he feels it SHOULD BE, not what it IS.
the last common ancestor of all old world monkeys lived after apes had already diverged.Raist said:Wait. Are you saying that apes diverged from the rest before old and new world monkeys diverged?
Raist said:I'm pretty sure Zhora started to smoke and drink because of you guys. Identity crisis.
a primate of the groups cercopithecoid or platyrrhine.Raist said:Sigh. Well fair enough, I'm very curious to know what a monkey IS. "Any anthropoid but apes" is not a valid answer btw.
Pandaman said:the last common ancestor of all old world monkeys lived after apes had already diverged.
Pandaman said:a primate of the groups cercopithecoid or platyrrhine.
Byakuya769 said:Why we still got monkeys?
nope, the last common ancestor of new world members postdates that split too.Raist said:Yes. But the new world monkeys diverged from the rest first. Thus, whatever diverged from the NW monkeys were also monkeys, which eventually diverged into OW monkeys and apes.
'monkey' isn't a group. its a name.And of course monkeys existed. Two different clades cannot be part of the same group if their ancestor wasn't the founding member of that group. Otherwise, that's paraphyletics.
:lolSyth_Blade22 said:DON'T BE STUPID KARL. MONKEYS CANT DO THAT.
Ricky let him finish.
Turns out it was another load of monkeys from another part of the island...from the rough bit...
yep.Undubbed said:Animals(like dolphins for instance) other than humans seem to be much much smarter than the average person seems to give them credit for these days.
Syth_Blade22 said:This thread is turning into spot the American...
Pandaman said:yep.
cephalopod too.
![]()
Pandaman said:nope, the last common ancestor of new world members postdates that split too.
a name two unrelated families of primates share.
but the common ancestor was neither a hippo nor a cetacean.
except it doesn't.Raist said:Which is exactly why the term shouldn't exist at all in any scientific context (yet it sure does).
sure you can, its a name, not a classification. you're arguing that two people shouldn't be called smith unless they share a parent.You can't call the same way two independent clades if their common ancestor wasn't part of that group as well.
but hey, its not a clade, its a name. this problem only exists because you insist it does. if you didn't convolute the names with the groups cladistic classification your point would disappear.That makes absolutely no sense. Because by that logic, the common ancestor of all new world monkeys wouldn't be a monkey.
And Aphidium, which was the common ancestor of all simians, completely fits the very definition of a monkey.
:lolPeople refuse to consider apes as monkeys for the very same reason that at some point they wouldn't consider humans as apes. Yet eventually that was accepted. Guess it'll take some more time for monkeys.
Pandaman said:except it doesn't.
:lol
Syth_Blade22 said:HEY GUYS THAT CHIMPS SMOKING.
I'm unfamiliar with that specimen, but 'vaguely lemurish primate with a flat face and extra teeth' works for me.Raist said:I certainly see the term "monkey" used a lot in primatology, phylogeny etc.
So I guess that you wouldn't call Aphidium a monkey then? What would it be for you?
but there is no correct definition.I mean, I understand your point that it is only a colloquial term, I'm just saying that it shouldn't be used at all in a scientific context. If you want to give a correct definition describing a monkey, then apes would fall in that category as well.
There's a slight difference, apes actually exist. a supergrouping of both monkey families never existed. hence why the term was done away with as an official classification. The name may have stuck, but it has no meaning.Well that's true. I mean not so long ago Apes were "all hominoidae but humans"
Or a chinese homeless person.OuterWorldVoice said:I have never seen a midget chinese.
Don't get me started on those reptiles.Raist said:Paraphyletic groups suck.
Ha-cha-cha-cha!!!DonMigs85 said:![]()
Be glad chimps are closer to us than this fine fellow.
I definitely am, because I just know the internet would be flooded with "erotic" nose-pulling videos if this were the case.DonMigs85 said:![]()
Be glad chimps are closer to us than this fine fellow.