So I wanted to see who was the current Mike Trout...
the most valuable player in terms of the top player's WAR compared to the team's total wins:
Some pretty surprising things in here.
First, David Bedgood is a complete monster. 9.1 WAR, and his play accounts for 12% of PHL's total wins.
Second, Mike Trout isn't even Seattle's best player (I was surprised). Johan Quevedo is having a monster season behind the plate. .316/.361/.557 with a 157 OPS+ and is a + defender.
Third, Division leaders tend to not have just one player driving success. Austin Meadows in Pittsburgh is an outlier, 10.3% of PIT's total wins are accounted for by Meadows. But every other division leader does not have one player account for more than 7.5% of total wins. My guys in Oakland trail everyone in this metric, Munoz only accounts for 5.1% of the total wins.
Now, sorting by Top Player WAR:
Here, Quevedo's great season comes even more into focus. But, I guess if you're going to beat out Mike Trout, you better be something special.
And sorting by best player WAR, division leaders do tend to have players in the top 50%. Just shows that teams need balance to win their divisions rather than just a couple star players.
Anyways, thought this was some interesting stuff.
Good luck to everyone in the stretch run!