• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Palestinian bedouin family's tent set afire in another arson attack by settlers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thankfully no one injured, but all the belongings are lost.
Palestinian Bedouin family's tent set afire in an arson attack by Jewish extremists

Ein Samia, West Bank (CNN) Suspected Jewish extremists set a tent belonging to a Palestinian Bedouin family on fire in an overnight arson attack, a Palestinian official told CNN on Thursday, two weeks after another arson on a Palestinian home killed a toddler and his father.

In the latest attack, a group of suspected Jewish extremists threw flammable material on the tent, said Ghassan Douglass, a Palestinian official in charge of monitoring settlement activity in the north of the West Bank. No one was hurt.

The tent belonged to the family of Yousuf Ka'abna in the village of Ein Samia, northeast of Ramallah in the West Bank, Douglass said.

Ka'abna told CNN his family had lived in the tent earlier but had moved down to other, cooler tents amid a recent heat wave. It still contained food, mattresses and bicycles, he said -- all now lost.

The arson appears to have been the latest so-called price tag attack, a term used to denote reprisals against Palestinians, often in response to moves by the Israeli government to evacuate illegal West Bank outposts.


The extremists spray-painted graffiti on the rocks by where the Bedouin tent was, reading "administrative revenge," Douglass said.

It is an apparent reference to the administrative detention recently imposed on three right-wing Israeli extremists by the Israeli authorities.
This comes in the wake of a previous arson attack by settlers which resulted in the death of father and a toddler.
 

NickFire

Member
That's a horrendous thought. That crimes and intimidation like this become a ho hum event.

I wont say you're wrong. Its sad how desensitized the violence in this world has made people, myself included.

Banality of evil in full display here.

You're kidding right? I wasn't defending the act. I was just surprised that burning a vacant tent was international news.
 

NickFire

Member
Once again, my snap reaction was not defending the suspected perpetrators. I literally read it and said to myself "this is an international story about a tent that burned with no people in it? Slow news day I guess."

If not being instantly outraged makes me a bad person then so be it, but I am not defending the conduct.
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
Once again, my snap reaction was not defending the suspected perpetrators. I literally read it and said to myself "this is an international story about a tent that burned with no people in it? Slow news day I guess."

If not being instantly outraged makes me a bad person then so be it, but I am not defending the conduct.

Nah, you have to own what you typed. It's an obvious international incident thanks to the cramped nexus of geopolitical forces involved. So it's on you.
 
Once again, my snap reaction was not defending the suspected perpetrators. I literally read it and said to myself "this is an international story about a tent that burned with no people in it? Slow news day I guess."

If not being instantly outraged makes me a bad person then so be it, but I am not defending the conduct.

That's like saying 'it's just another black kid being shot by a cop' when another such incident pops up.
 
You're kidding right? I wasn't defending the act. I was just surprised that burning a vacant tent was international news.
As you sit in the airconditioned comfort of your furniture, ponder on these points:

1. This is not just a vacant tent. This is the home of a bedouin family. The home had all their belongings, food and valuables. They have nothing now. Bedouins are poor and live mostly in outskirts.

2. The news would have been lot worse if the family was inside and thankfully wasn't.

3. The settlers have already killed a father and his 2 year old boy in a similar arson attack just two weeks ago.
 
Once again, my snap reaction was not defending the suspected perpetrators. I literally read it and said to myself "this is an international story about a tent that burned with no people in it? Slow news day I guess."

If not being instantly outraged makes me a bad person then so be it, but I am not defending the conduct.

The context makes it news. Context which you are dismissing all too easily.
 
Once again, my snap reaction was not defending the suspected perpetrators. I literally read it and said to myself "this is an international story about a tent that burned with no people in it? Slow news day I guess."

If not being instantly outraged makes me a bad person then so be it, but I am not defending the conduct.

If you take the tent out of all context surrounding it, sure.

Edit: damnit shortpants
 

Shaanyboi

Banned
Once again, my snap reaction was not defending the suspected perpetrators. I literally read it and said to myself "this is an international story about a tent that burned with no people in it? Slow news day I guess."

If not being instantly outraged makes me a bad person then so be it, but I am not defending the conduct.

If you want to outright ignore the intent of the action and all the surrounding context, sure, it's totally harmless and a non-story. Unfortunately, that's really not possible in this situation. It was an intentionally violent action and part of a far larger problem.
 

Walpurgis

Banned
Israeli Justice Minister
The Palestinian people has declared war on us, and we must respond with war. Not an operation, not a slow-moving one, not low-intensity, not controlled escalation, no destruction of terror infrastructure, no targeted killings. Enough with the oblique references. This is a war. Words have meanings. This is a war. It is not a war against terror, and not a war against extremists, and not even a war against the Palestinian Authority. These too are forms of avoiding reality. This is a war between two people. Who is the enemy? The Palestinian people. Why? Ask them, they started.
I mean, godwin's law and all, but this is the one time a Hitler comparison is not totally unreasonable

It remains completely unreasonable.

First, a speech will never be comparable to building actual gas chambers and ovens followed by mass murder and disposal of millions of people in one shot. Second, there is no calling for genocide in that statement. They are calling for all out war against their enemy who also believes they are at war. That speech was not a call for elimination of people for merely being Palestinian.

Its a call for all out war without restraint to end a situation once and for all (which involves terrorist attacks, rockets fired, tunnels built with supplies intended to rebuild the civilian infrastructure, and use of schools to hide weapons). It is not a call to eradicate people for the sake of who they are and nothing more. There is a big difference between extermination camps to eradicate someone for being Jewish and no other reason, and saying enough of this shit let's fight until the fight ends once and for all (in my opinion at least).

I was just surprised that burning a vacant tent was international news.

Just here to express your surprise, huh?
 

NickFire

Member
Just here to express your surprise, huh?

Yes, my first reaction was "this is a story about a burned tent that no one lived in at the moment?" You can cite to anything you want, including my refusal to compare that woman to Hitler, to try shaming me or goading me into arguing that the burning was justified, but it won't work because I don't feel that way.
 

S-Wind

Member
Yes, my first reaction was "this is a story about a burned tent that no one lived in at the moment?" You can cite to anything you want, including my refusal to compare that woman to Hitler, to try shaming me or goading me into arguing that the burning was justified, but it won't work because I don't feel that way.

It's very obvious you don't feel that way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom