25+ dead in a terrorist attack that targeted tourists, Hindus

Status
Not open for further replies.
Except that's not what he initially posted, plus he immediately called me stupid from the very start all because he was under the false impression a single person can't commit a terrorist attack. I fail to see how that makes my posts bizarre, as opposed to putting a rude and ignorant person in their place.
You are talking about events that uses terror, which qualifies crime as well, the cartels for example, but he is talking about organizations thats entire purpose is to cause terror. Which is almost always, right now, a muslim thing. So his point of view is not entirely wrong.

I dont think anyone here is saying that every terror event is automatically muslim.
 
You are talking about events that uses terror, which qualifies crime as well, the cartels for example, but he is talking about organizations thats entire purpose is to cause terror. Which is almost always, right now, a muslim thing. So his point of view is not entirely wrong.

I dont think anyone here is saying that every terror event is automatically muslim.

His original post and following posts made it abundantly clear he thinks any attack committed by one person can't qualify as a terrorist attack which is false. You do not have to belong to a group to qualify as a terrorist, and maybe he should have taken the seconds it would have required to Google that detail before he proceeded to immediately insult me.
 
His original post and following posts made it abundantly clear he thinks any attack committed by one person can't qualify as a terrorist attack which is false. You do not have to belong to a group to qualify as a terrorist, and maybe he should have taken the seconds it would have required to Google that detail before he proceeded to immediately insult me.
I only see the post where he said there are no christian terror groups. He specified he wasnt talking about single crazies, but outfits whos job is to plan terror across the globe.

Either way, no use harping on it.
 
I only see the post where he said there are no christian terror groups.

Post #46. "Today all violent terrorists are Muslim". Even if he supposedly meant to say "today all violent terrorist GROUPS are Muslim" (and he'd still be wrong there too), he could have clarified that but instead he chose to insult me.

And we shouldn't discount single perpetrators anyway, as they are usually fueled by similarly-minded groups online, which is gross to think about as these groups and especially the leaders and high-profile people of these groups or extreme ideologies push radical ideas which inspire and influence people who join such a group but then when a member inevitably goes off the deep end and racks up a body count, the rest of the group can put up their hands and go, "well, we didn't TECHNICALLY tell him to do that."

Regardless, I'm done talking about it. RoboFu insulted me, so I don't give a fuck what he has to say, and Banjo hopped in hours later to try to one-up me without even fully reading my post (I flat out clarified in my original post I only listed the attacks inspired by the Christchurch shootings, and 2019 wasn't ten years ago for that matter), but I appreciate you not insulting me and also taking the effort to fully read what I posted which is more than I can say for those other two.

Sam Elliott Country GIF by GritTV
 
What you are missing is demographics, a small percent of muslims produce an insane amout of violence. You will have a 10% muslim population of a country produce more attacks than the other 90%.

Its far more brutal than lone terrorists, neo-nazis, or any other crazy fucks. Oddly, Americans are so used to extreme violence and have such violent cities that it doesnt translate to how it does in Europe, where it has become a dystopian nightmare of murder and misery.

Actually in US cities, most violence occurs in a small amount of neighborhoods found in those cities.
 
I'm not even sure why Christianity is brought up in this thread. This is India, where the majority of religious violence is Muslim on Hindu, Hindu on Muslim, and Hindu on Sikh. Christianity isn't even a blip compared to all that.
 
Last edited:
India seems to be sending some reminders that the entire country of Pakistan exists only because of its grace and adherence to water treaties, through all the hundreds of cross border terror attacks and outright wars this never stopped. First they dried up the flow then sent it in a flood, it has full control either way, nearly everything Pakistan relies on for agriculture goes through India first. Even after Pakistan started and lost four wars, India never stopped the water like this. I'm not sure if they'll actually dam it long term but it seems more like a negotiation and reminder - if you do nothing while we take out terrorist launch pads we may restore the water treaty, otherwise we have full control over this.

 
Last edited:
Its sad to see this turned into a Islam thread when Kashmir is mostly a regional conflict. I wouldn't be surprised if this was planned and executed by Pakistani terrorist organizations that are directly funded by their intelligence agencies.

There are almost 200 million Muslims in India who don't commit terrorist attacks. The attacks are always done by Pakistani militias that either go rouge or do ISI's bidding. In fact, the Muslims in India have been the target of heinous attacks by Hindu nationalists in recent years. Ive read stories of mosques being defaced, Muslim businesses being burned down and vandalized while modi looks the other way. What's important to understand is that Indian Muslims did not go around checking dicks and shooting Hindus after literally dozens of these riots in recent years. They did what most normal people do and moved on with their lives.

Muslims and Hindus have been at each others throats for decades. This is not a Muslim only problem. Just 20 years ago almost 2000 muslims were murdered in cold blood in gujrat while their governor modi refused to send in the police. He was literally banned in UK and us until he became prime minister. The Indian missions i knew in college were very patriotic. We have so many mass shootings in the u.s and terrorist attacks in the West but India with all their Muslims don't. This is the work of Pakistanis.

Indian Muslims are like bengladeshi, Indonesian and malaysian Muslims. They don't fall for this jihad bullshit like Pakistanis and most Arab Muslims do. Pakistani terrorists are also state sponsored and likely brainwashed by professionals who have been training jihadists since the Soviet afghan war. Hamas, hezbollah, And youthis are also effectively state run terrorist organizations. You never heard of Iranian and Iraqi terrorists until after Saddam fell and the country fell into the hands of multiple terrorists organizations.

I still remember people pointing out that both World Trade Center attacks were planned by Pakistanis so why are we going after Saddam. Osama was literally living next to the Pakistani military academy for ten years. No way they didn't know. We Should've gone after Pakistan, not iraq and dealt with hezbollah, Hamas and other run organizations instead. This might look like a Muslim problem but these retards just happen to be Muslim.
 
Muslims are a minority in India.
And? There are still 200 million of them. Even accounting for population differences, Hindu violence against Muslims is still higher. It's also been increasing due to the rise of Hindu nationalism. Obviously I'm not claiming that Islam is free of violence in India, but they are certainly not the only ones that engage in it, nor even the most common.
 
Islam is the number one export of global terrorism. This is a fact, one you may find inconvenient.
How about you read what I'm actually talking about. The religious situation and attacks in India. You know, where the attack actually took place? Pretending Muslims are the largest instigators of violent attacks and that Hindus are blameless does nobody any favours.

Worldwide, it is true that Islam has the highest number of terror organisations. But what is occurring on other parts of the world is not very relevant with what is happening in India, as the Islam issues in the Middle East/West, and the religious tension in India are two very different things.

I'm hardly some sort of Islam supporter as the religion is terrible in many ways, but the facts are the facts.
 
And then we have trash like this who claim to be neutral and unbiased. Fuck them and the minority appeasement. Fuckers dont know or ignore on purpose the same might happen to their children/family/friends.


1cqse3a8qrwe1.png
 
Last edited:
Terrorist Nation spilling the beans



Isn't this even a different guy than their last defense minister that was a gaffe machine? There was another guy before this who admitted to a bunch of things he shouldn't have that almost made it hilarious

And then we have trash like this who claim to be neutral and unbiased. Fuck them and the minority appeasement. Fuckers dont know or ignore on purpose the same might happen to their children/family/friends.


1cqse3a8qrwe1.png

BBC is almost certainly one of the most colonial newspapers out there



Like THANK YOU ^^
 
Last edited:


This attack exposed many with sick mentality. Deleted the account and went underground. How come these fuckers live on the same land/country and hate it so much. What a sore loser

pRrmEfa.jpeg
 
The nationalism is showing with both of you.

And then we have trash like this who claim to be neutral and unbiased. Fuck them and the minority appeasement. Fuckers dont know or ignore on purpose the same might happen to their children/family/friends.


1cqse3a8qrwe1.png

The BBC are certainly no longer unbiased, but they do have an obligation to try and remain neutral.

They've been reporting on this atrocity, so you've resorted to semantics as a gotcha.


BBC is almost certainly one of the most colonial newspapers out there

There is no BBC newspaper. At least get your basic facts straight.

As for being colonial? No, if there is bias, it'll because Muslims have been promoted there due to DEI.
 
I'm almost surprised to see this covered decently in western media. I've had the CBC on 24/7 on the office TVs and it barely gets a passing mention, and always neglects to mention that it was Islamist terrorists rounding up and murdering 26 Hindus after verifying they weren't Muslim by pulling down their trousers and checking if they were cut. Zero noise out of the gays for gaza or whatever condemning this murder - be sure to remember that when they cry at the inevitable security crackdown.

 
Last edited:
Next level trolling

One country decides to go full war mode at 2am, panicked for their existence

The other country announces a presser and hotly anticipated, just talks about sugarcane prices the next day at 4pm

It would be hilarious if India kept forcing them to move their stuff around, just to get them to spend a bunch of money and push them over the edge of the drain they've been circling. Mobilizing the army is easy for a 4 trillion dollar country but not one literally needing month to month bailouts just to keep afloat through decades of bad governance hell bent on getting terrorists across India's border instead of development.

 
That's still a thing in India, huh?

That was disappointing. I know in a way it's aimed to "make it right", but the best way to get over it is get to a post caste world. Afaik it's been illegal to hire or discriminate based on caste for a long time, of course change takes time to get to small villages India is littered with.

But anyway, it was funny that they called a presser, Pakistan was shitting themselves, and then were like yeah sugarcane prices eh
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom