• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Paramount pulls plug on Watchmen movie

Status
Not open for further replies.

FoneBone

Member
http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire2005/index.php?id=31145

Well, it's not definitively dead, admittedly, though I don't expect it to see the light of day anytime soon. It probably would've sucked, but I almost would have liked to see them try... Judging from the script reviews, though, it sounds like it would have been considerably more faithful than V for Vendetta (which, as a graphic novel, is on the same level). Too bad it's far too late for that one to die.
 

Willco

Hollywood Square
It's far from dead. They're going to shop it to another studio and someone will pick it up, because Greengrass has already done a good deal of work on it and comic books are all the craze.
 

Willco

Hollywood Square
FoneBone said:
I'm not so optimistic that a studio will be willing to do a film that they can't turn into a franchise.

A big studio like Paramount, FOX, etc.? Probably not. A smaller one will, though. Also, I believe Warner Bros. still has the rights and at the rate they're filming DC Comics properties, I wouldn't be surprised to see them take a gamble.
 
With as little spoilers as possible (none?) can you say why you tink V for Vendetta isn't going to be faithful to the book?
 

Willco

Hollywood Square
I hate to break it to you, but from all indications, it's not just one or two things, but the majority of the production that's not faithful to the book. Alan Moore got pretty pissed about it himself.
 
Rats. I've been keeping something of a blackout onit (I really hate spoilers, even minor ones) and from what little I did see, I was excited (poster, Natalie Portman bald, inspired release date). Ah well. I still enjoyed From Hell and Constantine, and neither of those were faithful either.
 

8bit

Knows the Score
One reason that V for Vendetta won't work is because the main character isn't never fully revealed, it's only ever intended to be a cipher.

At the point where Hugo Weaving takes the mask off and turns to the screen, the whole thing is fucked.

However, the real reason it won't work for me is because the original was in black and white, and even the recoloured DC printing ruins it. It's far too 80's UK Britain to work as a blockbuster movie.

As to Watchmen, it will never work as a movie. 2 hours won't do it justice.
 

Flynn

Member
This makes sense. Paramount is under new management. Long-dormant projects usually get dropped once everyone involved in making the deal jumps ship.
 

borghe

Loves the Greater Toronto Area
The original plan for watchmen back in the 80's with Gilliam directing would have kicked ass.... too bad superman III and IV (and Captain America and Punisher) guaranteed that if you weren't batman you weren't going to get a movie made from a comic book back then.
 
This is probably for the best. BTW, if it means anything, Straczynski loves the V script:

http://comicbookresources.com/columns/index.cgi?column=litg&article=2163
JMS REVIEWS VENDETTA SCRIPT

"V For Vendetta" has continued shooting in London this week and the crowd scene with everyone in V masks and costumes has been confirmed by onlookers and photographers. Joe Michael Straczynski emailed this column with his own take on the "V For Vendetta" script and the comments made by fan reviewers at Aint It Cool last week.

Joe Michael Straczynski works for Warner Brothers, but that relationship has been a tested one. He, like Alan Moore, has refused to work with DC Comics, but currently writes the majority of his comics work for Marvel. He writes, "I saw this and though everything in me yells against getting into these things, I have got to respond.

"Understand: I work with Marvel, I have no vested interest in defending DC or Alan or anyone or anything else.

"The anonymous individual who sent AiCN his 'review' has his head well and duly up his butt. That he had a copy of the script is obvious; that he understood it, less so. There's an old saying: a book is like a mirror, if an ass peers in, you can't expect an apostle to peer out. This person clearly has no idea what's actually going on in that script despite having read it (or having it read to him). You can take anything -- ANYthing -- and by casting it in a certain light, make it sound stupid. 'Oh, and at the end of Blade Runner, there's this REALLY stupid scene where the android guy's, like, hugging a pigeon and talking about moons on fire.' It's all in how you phrase it. Making fun of something is easy.

"About a month ago, I got hold of the V script, the very same draft that this anonymous assassin cites. As a fan of Alan's work, and the V books in particular, I sat down, eager to read it.

"What I read blew my brains out through the back of my head.

"I think it's one of the smartest, sharpest, insightful and well-crafted scripts I've ever read. It's emotional, evocative, heart-rending, biting, sharp, relentless and just plain garden variety powerful. It's not just a good film, it's an *important* film, and there's a great deal of subtlety and nuance in it that was clearly lost on the idiot that read the script so he could make fun of it and stir the pot.

"So there is no 'consensus.' All you've got is one anonymous guy who takes a few things out of context to make them look stupid, revealing his own mendacity and cupidity in the process. As someone who's not just written over two hundred produced scripts and read hundreds more, someone who is a fan of Alan's work, I'm telling you straight-up, with absolutely no agenda: the 'V for Vendetta' script is a work of freaking genius.

"As will be proven soon enough."
 
It's enough for me to maintain enough cognitive dissonance to last until I see the movie and prove it true or false myself.

Of course, I harbored hope for League of Extraordinary Gentlemen for a while, too (although the stink of that was unmistakable by the time the movie posters hit).
 

Flynn

Member
Praise from JMS dubbing a Wachoswki script "important."

We're offically through the looking glass on this one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom