nVidiot_Whore
Banned
so wait, is the outrage over trayvon martin too much also then? or is that justified because [insert reason here]
Murder != words.
He is specifically talking about people being outraged over what someone says.
so wait, is the outrage over trayvon martin too much also then? or is that justified because [insert reason here]
No. It doesn't even have anything to do with them. It's just a 'Haha remember 2008!?' type joke. Completely tame by any reasonable standardHmm OK. Because the potential white first ladies in question are so terrible? Seems like a really bad joke.
There's no equivalent. Just like there's no liberal equivalent of FOX. The space between liberals like Maher or me and the Democratic party is huge, but I think Limbaugh is much more representative of some significant plurality of conservative opinion.Well Bill absolutely disagrees with anyone saying that. Currently listening to last weeks show.
He said he didn't understand how he was the "leader/voice" of the Democratic party. For one, he wasn't a democrat. And two, if he was the leader of the Democratic party pot would be legal by now.
But anyhow, who would you say is a better antithesis of Rush?
I think that donation really putt a mark on him. So yeah while Bill is "representative" of liberals, it's not exactly the same way. For one the Republican candidates seem completely afraid of disparaging Rush. Dems..I don't think they would care either way.
... you don't have a very good sense of humor, do you?Hmm OK. Because the potential white first ladies in question are so terrible? Seems like a really bad joke.
His show isn't about being offended by the right. It's about calling them out for their bullshit.
I can't remember Maher *ever* asking someone from the right who said something offensive to apologize for it. He'll make fun of them or call them an asshole for it, but he never acts offended.
Yup, as a Canadian I am totally outraged by this.
There's no equivalent. Just like there's no liberal equivalent of FOX. The space between liberals like Maher or me and the Democratic party is huge, but I think Limbaugh is much more representative of some significant plurality of conservative opinion.
Oh OK.No. It doesn't even have anything to do with them. It's just a 'Haha remember 2008!?' type joke. Completely tame by any reasonable standard
I thought I did. This one just didn't make sense to me, I thought there was some kind of underlying thing I just wasn't getting. =(... you don't have a very good sense of humor, do you?
If anyone could compete with Rush in terms of influence, it'd be someone like Jon Stewart - but for that comparison to be apt Stewart would have to ditch the 'I'm a comedian' thing and start taking himself way too seriously.
so wait, is the outrage over trayvon martin too much also then? or is that justified because [insert reason here]
Unneeded jab at Canada by an unfunny US comedian. Go figure.
You can't be, you're Canadian! You're too nice to be outraged!!
Bill is a truth teller. Some people have a need in their life to get all hot and bothered over trivial comments.
Or they see it as a chance to get something.
a lot of neogaf members should read this article imo
I Agree. Everyone needs to stop being a bunch of whiny bitches.
Deal with the whiny bitches the same way Maher says he deals with Rush: don't listen to them. Don't take offense at them and try to make them stop acting the way they do, then you're no better than they are.
I Agree. Everyone needs to stop being a bunch of whiny bitches.
a lot of neogaf members should read this article imo
So how many of you think that Limbaugh's slut-shaming of Sandra Fluke and the whole contraception thing should not have been a big deal? Because that's what Maher's talking about.
If any of you criticized Limbaugh for that or spoke out against him, you don't agree with this article.
How much shit did Bill Clinton ever apologize for? I wish Obama had thicker skin. Maybe next term.
That comment got a legitimate lol from me.
Canada jokes are always funny.
You're really missing the point here. Maher was talking about faked or at least hyperbolic rage for political gains. It can easily be generalized to non-political situations ... but the point still remains.so wait, is the outrage over trayvon martin too much also then? or is that justified because [insert reason here]
That's not really true. His show is weekly and runs on seasons. It's not like it's a daily show he needs to fill with tons of fluff. Given the relative infrequency of his show, there typically is plenty of things throughout the world to have valid rage about.LOL. He'd have no show if that happened. How insincere.
I really don't get how they are funny. People that always find them funny remind me of infants that always giggle whenever keys are jiggled in front of them.
Though considering they aren't infants maybe a more appropriate comparison would be a dog? Like... they are trained to laugh at the mere mention of Canada in a jokey context. Like Pavlov's dog.
But those situations would engender warranted outrage ... which is not what he's taking about.But his plea to "just ignore things you don't like" assumes that words have literally zero effect at all if you don't listen to them. Except that words can often perpetuate stereotypes, fallacies, and hatred that do affect people, whether they choose to listen to them or not.
One thing I thought was hilarious about Gingrich asking Obama to apologize for De Niro's comments(which is retarded in itself) is that he lambasted Obama for apologizing for the military burning Qurans. Gingrich is a fucking joke in his beliefs, as are most republicans.
Can someone change my tag to whiny bitch?Faux outrage from Lambtron!