• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

"Policing For Profit" Now Banned In New Mexico

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rajack

Member
http://www.abqjournal.com/567598/po...l-signed-into-law-by-gov-susana-martinez.html

Gov. Susana Martinez does not like the term “policing for profit,” but she still signed into law today a measure aimed at barring law enforcement from seizing money, cars or other types of property from people on civil grounds during an arrest or traffic stop on suspicion the property was connected to a crime.

The civil asset forfeiture legislation, House Bill 560, was approved unanimously by both the New Mexico House and Senate but Martinez did not act on the measure until today, her final day to sign or veto bills passed during the 60-day session.

In an executive message explaining her decision to sign the bill, Martinez said that as a former prosecutor she understands the importance of protecting constitutional rights and innocent property owners.

However, the Republican governor took issue with the term “policing for profit,” which backers of the legislation have used to describe civil asset forfeiture.

“… I must make it clear that ‘policing for profit’ is an overused, oversimplified and cynical term that, in my opinion, disrespects our law enforcement officers,” Martinez wrote, adding the catch phrase impugns the motives of police officers.

The practice of civil asset forfeiture has funneled millions of dollars and property to state and local law enforcement agencies, some of which sent letters to the governor asking her to veto the legislation.

Martinez, whose husband is a former Dona Ana County undersheriff, wrote in her executive message that funds acquired through forfeiture have been beneficial to law enforcement efforts, adding, “We cannot allow this new law to undermine our efforts to combat crime throughout this state.”

Backers of the legislation celebrated Martinez’s decision to sign the bill, saying the new law is one of the toughest of its kind in the nation.
Basically now Police in NM can't seize your assets without giving them back, or seize them at all without strong probable cause or a warrant. Big win for civilian's rights.
 

benjipwns

Banned
So much for New Mexico. Cars and houses and cash are going to get away scot free with crimes, that'll just encourage them to be even more connected to crimes. And the police won't have the funds to combat the crime wave by inanimate objects.
 

benjipwns

Banned
All the comments on the story are approving...I...I don't know what to do...

world...view...shaken...blacking o
 

Patrol

Banned
Its kinda sad this isn't a law everywhere in the first place

These sort of scenarios typically do not impact your average individual, but the drug-runners and cartel/gangs that funnel cash/drugs up and down the interstate system. Basically, if they stop your vehicle and you have, for example, $14,000 in cash yet you haven't been employed in x amount of years and you cannot give any reason why you have the cash... it's presumed to have been obtained by illicit means.

The interesting part is the whole "innocent until proven guilty" mindset is thrown out the window here and the funds are rarely returned as the process of getting them is buried under a mountain of forms and paperwork.
 

Chichikov

Member
So much for New Mexico. Cars and houses and cash are going to get away scot free with crimes, that'll just encourage them to be even more connected to crimes. And the police won't have the funds to combat the crime wave by inanimate objects.
And soda machines, don't forget soda machines.

rzOJyny.gif


It's all fun and games until a clown truck go on a murderous rampage.
 

Patrol

Banned

Motels are notorious spots for prostitution, drugs, and illegal firearms sales. It's only an asset issue if the owner collaborates with the criminals to continue the activity and/or make no effort to stop the illegal activities. Same thing when criminals use houses for meth-labs, or a grow, and the owner knows about the illegal means and allows it to continue.
 

benjipwns

Banned
Motels are notorious spots for prostitution, drugs, and illegal firearms sales. It's only an asset issue if the owner collaborates with the criminals to continue the activity and/or make no effort to stop the illegal activities. Same thing when criminals use houses for meth-labs, or a grow, and the owner knows about the illegal means and allows it to continue.
Or...we could not criminalize those things in the first place along with not seizing assets of third parties who aren't required to combat crime* along with not being completely crazy and charging inanimate objects with crimes.

*Much like the police.

And soda machines, don't forget soda machines.

http://i.imgur.com/rzOJyny.gif

It's all fun and games until a clown truck go on a murderous rampage.
It's a risk we have to take for our principles.
 

Patrol

Banned
Or...we could not criminalize those things in the first place along with not seizing assets of third parties who aren't required to combat crime* along with not being completely crazy and charging inanimate objects with crimes.

*Much like the police.


It's a risk we have to take for our principles.
I think that's a different debate, entirely. There are however legal bindings in place that residence/commercial owners must adhere too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom