slidewinder said:What would your prescription be?
Cut taxes, end entitlements, demolish the public sector, and then wait as the money from the wealthy trickles down.
slidewinder said:What would your prescription be?
Jackson50 said:Sure. But it was not merely ADP's employment report that caused increased expectations. A host of other metrics indicated increased hiring and economic activity.
GhaleonEB said:It's very odd how every other measure of employment - UI claims, private payroll growth (which showed 150k increase), ISM indexes - all improved month over month, yet the final BLS numbers are down steeply. That's one of the stories of this recovery - the official payroll numbers are entirely de-coupled from every other reading. It's incredibly weird.
And Obama is continuing to dig his own grave with huge cuts in spending.
Ian Shep. of HFE asks whether late Easter messed up seasonals. If last year's seas adjust had been used, jobs would've = +182k. Thoughts?
Incognito said:this came across my twitter feed from david leonhardt of the nytimes -- not sure what to think about it.
Measley said:Cut taxes, end entitlements, demolish the public sector, and then wait as the money from the wealthy trickles down.
My answer would be: U6 is up; the rest is something of a shell game.Incognito said:this came across my twitter feed from david leonhardt of the nytimes -- not sure what to think about it.
mckmas8808 said:I'm about to go ape shit on a tea partier that I work with. He always complains about too much gov't spending and how much he hates unions (even though he always says how much he loves getting overtime money).
This son of a bitch is now complaining and is pissed off that the space shuttle is ending. He's purely blaming Obama for killing it and kill 10s of thousands of jobs.
Does it not understand the hypocrisy? AAARRRGGGHHH!!!!
mckmas8808 said:I'm about to go ape shit on a tea partier that I work with. He always complains about too much gov't spending and how much he hates unions (even though he always says how much he loves getting overtime money).
This son of a bitch is now complaining and is pissed off that the space shuttle is ending. He's purely blaming Obama for killing it and kill 10s of thousands of jobs.
Does he not understand the hypocrisy? AAARRRGGGHHH!!!!
Should we go back to the all the Bush strategies that caused the financial meltdown? That will be a funny thing if Obama loses . . . . hey, let's go from bad to worse! woo-hoo!eznark said:Demanding new stimulus.
Brilliant.
You see slack in some sectors as a general glutslidewinder said:What would your prescription be?
We need few more mega stimulus packages in order to move the economy forward. I think this is the first time in history where a recession is not being countered with tax increases and more spending programs. On the contrary, we are focused on debt ceiling which is incredibly distracting from the real issue: jobs. Once again, Republicans are successful in shifting the debate despite being a minority in two branches. A debt ceiling vote is as routine as apple pie, but for some reason (I can think of a few actually), we started playing chicken with debt ceiling which in turn is shaking the confidence of investors and global economy even more (on top of a tepid recovery). I'm thoroughly convinced about the Republican game now, and it is absolutely clear. Destroy the economy, oust the Muslim black panther giving orders, and put a good (read white) christian conservative in. I'm truly convinced. Sorry eznark, TA and others who try to present the other side in a respectable manner. But there's no way this batch of Republicans have any good faith in America right now. I don't hate the Republican party itself, just the politicians in the office right now. Both the parties should be holding meetings and conferences on how to boost the economy and create more jobs, but one wants to be the schoolyard bully and dictate it's terms.speculawyer said:As I've been harping for years now, there is not much anyone can do to make things better.
So, Obama wins 2012 in a landslide then.PhoenixDark said:I think it's becoming more and more clear he's not getting re-elected.
PhoenixDark said:Nearly all the indicators were positive, hm.
And instead of fighting over jobs, Obama is about to broker a deal that slashes spending like never before. I think it's becoming more and more clear he's not getting re-elected. He will not do anything that might fail, or has little chance of working. Hence his utter silence on jobs, unless it's the weekly presidential youtube speech no one listens to. This guy dug his own grave and jumped in it just to increase his poll numbers
President Obamas senior political adviser David Plouffe said Wednesday that people wont vote in 2012 based on the unemployment rate.
Nope, he compromised for a vote on the debt deal and prevented America's debt rating from becoming junk like Portugal's.PhoenixDark said:Hence his utter silence on jobs, unless it's the weekly presidential youtube speech no one listens to. This guy dug his own grave and jumped in it just to increase his poll numbers
This is way to early to talk about 2012PhoenixDark said:Nearly all the indicators were positive, hm.
And instead of fighting over jobs, Obama is about to broker a deal that slashes spending like never before. I think it's becoming more and more clear he's not getting re-elected. He will not do anything that might fail, or has little chance of working. Hence his utter silence on jobs, unless it's the weekly presidential youtube speech no one listens to. This guy dug his own grave and jumped in it just to increase his poll numbers
Why does Ben Bernanke still has a job?eznark said:
That... hasn't actually happened yet.RustyNails said:Nope, he compromised for a vote on the debt deal and prevented America's debt rating from becoming junk like Portugal's.
Chichikov said:This is way to early to talk about 2012
Remember how after Bin Laden a second term was an open and shut case?
Yeah.
The public has a really short memory, at the polls, people will think of the economy of 2012, not 2011.
He need to have a better job performance though.
Chichikov said:Why does Ben Bernanke still has a job?
Come one now, you really think people know who Bernanke is?eznark said:Politics.
Bernanke allows Obama to keep calling this the past administrations recession.
That's cold.eznark said:At least the Royals are still hot.
Chichikov said:Why does Ben Bernanke still has a job?
eznark said:Bernanke allows Obama to keep calling this the past administrations recession.
Although this is arguably because of his position rather than actions.mckmas8808 said:Because the guy helped save our economy?
It isn't?eznark said:Politics.
Bernanke allows Obama to keep calling this the past administrations recession.
Hitokage said:Although this is arguably because of his position rather than actions.
mckmas8808 said:Because it was. We aren't in a recession right now.
I can't tell if you're joking.mckmas8808 said:Because the guy helped save our economy?
Really?gcubed said:the guy basically lived and breathed economics of the great depression. I give him a little more credit than just being fed reserve chariman
eznark said:Walks like a duck and sings like a duck
He took the GOP's bait.GhaleonEB said:It's very odd how every other measure of employment - UI claims, private payroll growth (which showed 150k increase), ISM indexes - all improved month over month, yet the final BLS numbers are down steeply. That's one of the stories of this recovery - the official payroll numbers are entirely de-coupled from every other reading. It's incredibly weird.
And Obama is continuing to dig his own grave with huge cuts in spending.
DOO13ER said:Hey, the big boys are doing just dandy right? Fuck the rest, it'll drip down eventually. Recession over.
Chichikov said:I can't tell if you're joking.
Seriously, I can't.
Really?
Did you read the article that started this discussion?
Or are you arguing in favor of quantitative easing?
Even though its results were exactly what its critics were predicting?
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2011/07/update_on_social_security_cuts.php?ref=fpblgRep. Barney Frank says Minority Leader Pelosi reassured House Democrats that the COLA change (which amounts to escalating cuts to Social Security over time) floated in the press will not happen.
DOO13ER said:Hey, the big boys are doing just dandy right? Fuck the rest, it'll drip down eventually. Recession over.
Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, a Republican, is reviewing the pledge, a spokesman said Thursday night. Several other GOP presidential candidates didnt respond to requests for comment, including former Michigan Gov. Mitt Romney, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, and retired Georgia businessman Herman Cain.
I think there's a legitimately interesting question to be discussed about the value of nationalizing things like oil production, but that plan is patently ridiculous.jamesinclair said:Its time to elect a new president that will take the actions necessary to get this economy moving.
-Return to the tax rates of the 80s
-Use the new income to buy up the most profitable companies. Apple. Google. Oil. Apple has a market cap of 330.92B. 200B buys you all you need, and thats just a couple of months of Pentagon money.
-Instead of directing massive profits (after R&D allocation) to the pockets of a few privileged wealthy, direct profit directly into infrastructure and education investment
-Enjoy millions of new jobs and monies.
Invisible_Insane said:I think there's a legitimately interesting question to be discussed about the value of nationalizing things like oil production, but that plan is patently ridiculous.
I'm voting for you jamesinclair. Only if you throw Microsoft in there as well.jamesinclair said:Its time to elect a new president that will take the actions necessary to get this economy moving.
-Return to the tax rates of the 80s
-Use the new income to buy up the most profitable companies. Apple. Google. Oil. Apple has a market cap of 330.92B. 200B buys you all you need, and thats just a couple of months of Pentagon money.
-Instead of directing massive profits (after R&D allocation) to the pockets of a few privileged wealthy, direct profit directly into infrastructure and education investment
-Enjoy millions of new jobs and monies.
Invisible_Insane said:I think there's a legitimately interesting question to be discussed about the value of nationalizing things like oil production, but that plan is patently ridiculous.
Bulbo Urethral Baggins said:I'm voting for you jamesinclair. Only if you throw Microsoft in there as well.
Dude, that is the sloppiest reasoning of all time.jamesinclair said:Because our current situation is not ridiculous at all.
But yes, oil should be nationalized. Its the only thing keeping the world propped up at this point.
Look at the "winning" US states, like Alaska and Texas. Oil.
Look at the "winning" emerging economies, like Brazil and Russia. Oil.
Look at the "fuck us look how rich we are" countries like Qatar. Oil.
Meanwhile, what do places like Greece, Portugal, Ireland etc have in common? No oil.
Invisible_Insane said:Dude, that is the sloppiest reasoning of all time.
PhoenixDark said:Nearly all the indicators were positive, hm.
And instead of fighting over jobs, Obama is about to broker a deal that slashes spending like never before. I think it's becoming more and more clear he's not getting re-elected. He will not do anything that might fail, or has little chance of working. Hence his utter silence on jobs, unless it's the weekly presidential youtube speech no one listens to. This guy dug his own grave and jumped in it just to increase his poll numbers
TacticalFox88 said:Do we have some good news at the very least?
The suggestion that the Greek/Irish debt crises were caused by a lack of state oil production... come on, now.jamesinclair said:No its not.
Go down the list of states, countries etc.
Make a list of haves and have-nots (economic growth)
Youll note an extremely high correlation (which is not causation) with oil production.
Fun fact: You know how California had its economic peak in the 1980s? Guess when California hit its peak oil output.
How is it that northern europe (norway, sweden, GB, russia, germany etc) are all doing so well, and southern europe is in deep shit?
Look at where the oil is.