Son of Godzilla
Banned
Hootie said:So what will Obama's big message be in the '12 election? This one was ALL about change in Washington, but by then he will be the big man. :lol
Hootie said:So what will Obama's big message be in the '12 election? This one was ALL about change in Washington, but by then he will be the big man. :lol
master15 said:Newsweek has put up part 2 of their fasinating look into the behind the scenes of the campaigns. Part 2 is all about Mccain's sloppy start, there's some fasinating insight here. Must read folks;
http://www.newsweek.com/id/167639/page/1
By summer, McCain had less cash on hand than Ron Paul, the libertarian cult candidate.
master15 said:Newsweek has put up part 2 of their fasinating look into the behind the scenes of the campaigns. Part 2 is all about Mccain's sloppy start, there's some fasinating insight here. Must read folks;
http://www.newsweek.com/id/167639/page/1
http://politicalwire.com/Several Democrats tell the AP that Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) "was actively seeking appointment as secretary of State in the new administration."
Fragamemnon said:Bush's economic team was full of raging supply-siders and free market fundies, too. I'd say that America probably rejected that particular extreme more than it did neoconservatism last night.
Hootie said:So what will Obama's big message be in the '12 election? This one was ALL about change in Washington, but by then he will be the big man. :lol
I'm sorry what I meant to say was I'll be in Washington for the Inauguration but I don't have tickets to the inauguration...you can get them from your local congressman or senator. Start email and writing them and hope you get a pass, but there won't be many.TiVo said:Where did you get tickets? R U sure it aint a scam site? I called Barack's official number and a volunteer told me to go to here http://inaugural.senate.gov/index.cfm
And I see no info on tickets being sold yet.
Also called
202-224-6352
And she said those sites might be fake cause tickets will be handed out by congressional folks, you gotta contact them to get on a list.
ViperVisor said:
America didn't reject Clinton, Gore did. That was such a fucking stupid election...Jason's Ultimatum said:Why did Americans reject Clintonomics when Gore was running? Did Gore's personality turned off a lot of voters? It puzzles me that we had such a great economy and then Bush gets elected.
Jason's Ultimatum said:Why did Americans reject Clintonomics when Gore was running? Did Gore's personality turned off a lot of voters? It puzzles me that we had such a great economy and then Bush gets elected.
Tamanon said:Nah, otherwise ex-Presidents would be eligible to be Veep.
Kerry as Sec. State? Ugh. Wouldn't Richardson be better in that role? Hell, I'd even take Clinton in that role. PEACE.PhoenixDark said:
Slurpy said:Man, it seems like everyone around me today has an extra spring in their step. They're smiling just a bit more. Everyone just looks livelier. I feel it.. like a huge burden off my shoulders. Its a magical feeling, one that I hope does not dissipate soon.
Seth C said:To be fair, there are people in line for succession that would have to be skipped right now. Also, there seems to be debate as to whether a two-term President could run for VP (the law says a VP must meet all eligibility requirements to be President, but the only law that would disqualify him is that a President cannot be "elected" a third time -- which a VP would not be, he would be elected VP and would assume the Presidency).
Pimpwerx said:Kerry as Sec. State? Ugh. Wouldn't Richardson be better in that role? Hell, I'd even take Clinton in that role. PEACE.
Slurpy said:Man, it seems like everyone around me today has an extra spring in their step. They're smiling just a bit more. Everyone just looks livelier. I feel it.. like a huge burden off my shoulders. Its a magical feeling, one that I hope does not dissipate soon.
Oh yeah, he also went on how, according to him, Republicans keep saying conservatism needs to be reinvented but Democrats never say liberalism needs to be reinvented. He gave an off-hand mention of both of Obama's books being autobiographical.speculawyer said:Yeah . . . this is some of the best stuff of the election . . . instead of rationally figuring out why they lost, they are just ignoring reality and sticking with faith-based politics. Never mind the polls that conclusively showed that Palin was millstone around McCain's neck . . . they'll just go farther right! Right into the wilderness of unelectability.
538 is late to the party on that.Bowser said:538 reporting the GA Senate race is going to a runoff.
obijkenobi said:Pretty much. I'm Hispanic and I feel like Obama broke the glass ceiling for those of darker colors. When I have kids, I'll be able to say them and honestly mean it that they too can be President. A week ago, I wouldn't have been able to say that. It is such an amazing feeling.
RubxQub said:
They don't, but it's better to have a black face spewing Obama hate than a white one. PEACE.ViperVisor said:Half the time on cable news the black folks are GOP hacks. Funny, I thought they didn't want affirmative action.
I actually started crying on my way to vote yesterday.zesty said:I need to stop watching these reaction videos at work. I get a little choked up every time, and when watching several back to back, I get perilously close to crying like a fat girl on prom night.
Cloudy said:If Obama campaigned for the Dem, that could be close..
draven said:I feel the exact same way. Even though it seems that the majority of South Florida Hispanics voted against Obama, after his win I truly believe that my 4-month old dark-skinned baby daughter has all the chance in the world to become President when she grows up. And that makes me immensely happy and proud.
grandjedi6 said:538 is late to the party on that.
Speaking of 538, I love the sight but I can't really see a point to it anymore. Its mission is accomplished and really has no more point to itself.
grandjedi6 said:538 is late to the party on that.
Speaking of 538, I love the sight but I can't really see a point to it anymore. Its mission is accomplished and really has no more point to itself.
ana said:Propably old but still..
http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj243/janikvir/2h3rhqw.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
PoliGAF -> somewhere else -> PoliGAF
Didn't someone in this thread actually make that image last week?
Shirokun said:It's the only way Martin even has a chance.
There is nothing legally stopping Bill from being appointed to a cabinet position. Succession doesn't matter since they just skip over them if they aren't eligible. For example, the current Secretary of Commerce and Secretary of Labor are skipped in the line of succcession since they aren't natural born citizens.Tamanon said:I'm pretty sure he can't, not that he ever would want to. Succession would make it an issue.
They need to change thier name, 2012 will have more than 538 EVs for sure.grandjedi6 said:538 is late to the party on that.
Speaking of 538, I love the sight but I can't really see a point to it anymore. Its mission is accomplished and really has no more point to itself.
Due to the stressful and demanding nature of the job, the average term-of-service for a White House Chief of Staff is a little under two and a half years. John R. Steelman, under Harry S. Truman, was the last Chief of Staff to serve for an entire presidential administration. Steelman also holds the record for longest-serving Chief of Staff (6 years). Andrew Card and Sherman Adams tie for second-longest (5 years each).
Some have suggested that a powerful Chief of Staff with a "hands-off" president (who decides not to become involved in the minutiæ of government), can become a de facto prime minister. Such prime ministers exist in some governmental systems, such as France's and Russia's: The prime minister runs the government (operations-wise), while the president remains somewhat aloof from the political process, but personally handling policy matters. Under Ronald Reagan, Donald Regan was seen by many as a prime minister-style Chief of Staff following James Baker. Howard Baker, who succeeded Regan, was critical of this system and what is sometimes known as the "Imperial Presidency."
By contrast, Andrew Card, President George W. Bush's first Chief of Staff, was not regarded as being as powerful. Some have speculated that this was due to Card being "overshadowed" by the influence of Karl Rove, the Senior Adviser and Deputy Chief of Staff who was "the architect" of Bush's political rise. Similarly, President Bill Clinton's Chiefs of Staff were not particularly powerful.
PhoenixDark said:Rahm Emanuel Chief of Staff confirmed
Muslim Zionist Tag Team Tsunamiii
PhoenixDark said:That job is tough as rocks though, and he has young kids :/