PoliGAF Community Thread
Remember, lets keep general politics in the community thread, debate/primary talk in here. Otherwise, we will have to revolt against Evilore (what, does he think he owns this information website, or what?!!?) or have these threads turn into megathreads with misleading titles and have them get locked, frequently.
Apparently, engagement entails either subversion or intervention. Otherwise, it's appeasement. It's a fairly disingenuous and puerile method of foreign policy. Moreover, Santorum's overwrought diatribe on Obama's Latin American policy was the most noisome moment in a debate replete with them.
Right. And with good reason. Debates are less consequential in the general election because the preponderance of voters make partisan decisions. But in the primary election where every candidate is from the same party, they cannot rely on that heuristic. Thus, debates, advertisements, and, most importantly, elite support are useful signals for voters.
Elected officials are the most prominent. Although, the partisan press has become fairly influential.
She doesn't want Newt to win. She just wants to make Mitt a weaker candidate to legitimize her 3rd party run.
You make it sound as if the polls are merely failing to reflect an extant Roemer surge.
It's funny because Brewer lied about the whole thing. The two mayors who were there said Obama was cool as a cucumber.
I want to meet someone who actually decided to buy Jan Brewer's book.
(Don't worry, I almost posted a WrassleGAF post in PoliGAF once.)
