Also do we actually know if Outlwas is selling poorly?
While I do think people follow mainstream sites like IGN less (Kotaku is kind of dead), the premise of the article is a bit suspect considering the author is saying “Star Wars: Outlaws” is not selling.
I don’t think we have any numbers for that and I would be surprised if a Ubisoft Star Wars Open World game didn’t sell relatively well.
The article skirts around some legit points but the way it presents Star Wars Outlaws as a game that has failed miserably when it came out yesterday just screams large language model without any context.
Ryan McCurdface did. Whom we all know as an horrible reviewer and worse 'journalist'.And Alien Isolation a 5.9/10
yeah, i'm pretty sure that an article labelling a game a 'failure' that was written it'd appear the day after the game released deserves a certain amount of distrust. re-arranging reality to support a premise? never a good look...While I do think people follow mainstream sites like IGN less (Kotaku is kind of dead), the premise of the article is a bit suspect considering the author is saying “Star Wars: Outlaws” is not selling.
I don’t think we have any numbers for that and I would be surprised if a Ubisoft Star Wars Open World game didn’t sell relatively well.
At the risk of disappointing its detractors, Concord is a very good hero shooter that could very well overshadow the big names in the genre, if a community of players takes it that far. Firewalk's service game is based on solid arguments: great shooting sensations, 16 varied and perfectly oiled heroes, impeccable technique and artistic direction and even attractive tactical perspectives. As it stands, we just regret overly classic game modes as well as a universe that would have deserved a more important place within the experience... Two points that are not set in stone and that will most certainly improve with future updates (all free, there is no season pass or battle pass, let us remind you). A very good choice. We loved it.
Concord is too daring a gamble for Firewalk and PlayStation Studios, who are releasing a 100% multiplayer pay-to-play game in a pool of already famous free-to-play games. While the game isn't fundamentally bad, it's slower and less dynamic than its rivals, which will hold some players back, and in no way revolutionizes the genre, which might have justified the entry fee. The game aims to be that “hero-shooter for casuals par excellence”, but does this genre have a place in today's ecosystem, and a paying one at that? Unfortunately, it's hard to see a bright future for Concord without some radical rethinking.
Concord gets the fundamentals right: unique characters, strong art direction and tightly designed combat make for thrilling matches with Crew Bonuses adding a welcome extra level of strategy. Uninteresting progression, unrealised storytelling potential and a lack of personality hold it back, but a commitment to the content roadmap and worldbuilding could salvage things. I am hopeful Firewalk Studios can turn things around given the chance.
Correlation does not equal causation.This. If a AAA game scores 60 on Metacritic, it'll impact its sales greatly.
I don't think this post is as smart or as insightful as you hoped it'd be.Correlation does not equal causation.
I have never bought a game based solely on its reviews, but I can see the point.
https://www.neogaf.com/threads/ign-posts-black-myth-wukong-hit-piece-gets-community-noted.1671943/ its all in thereSo, the Wukong people told Sweet Baby to get fucked? $7,000,000 lol. Pay us to tell you your wrong think won’t work. WE WILL DECIDE FOR YOU WHAT IS ACCEPTABLE. And promptly ruin your game. We will rewrite it for the people that don’t buy games.
If that’s what happened I’ll buy the game today.
The GIF that keeps on giving.
Games with 60-70 in Metacritic received glowing reviews?Star Wars: Outlaws, Concord (PS5, PC), and Dustborn. Despite receiving glowing reviews from these outlets, these games failed miserably upon release.
Wukong got better reviews overall than Dustborn, Concord and Outlaws. This article is just trying to push the "critics are always wrong" meme.Didn't IGN give it an 8? Was that meant to negatively affect sales?
This game is a special case anyway. It's sales are coming mostly out of China. I doubt they are checking IGN over there.
I can only speak for myself. But I am extremely grateful that ign was there to protect me.
This. "Can't spell ignorant without IGN" didn't originate yesterday, I already heard that 20 years ago. Which is also when I stopped going there, because their reviews were so generic (ok, maybe more like 15 years ago). Which clearly was the right decision from the few tidbits I've seen from people like those Destin or Greg Miller guys, who apparently all spawned there. Terrible.IGN has never been a "trusted voice" that "every gamer looked up to".
They just had big media money behind them for their entire existence.
I don't know anything about Kotaku's history because I never visited there.
But I know that they haven't been "gaming media" for several years now.
Shittake...and now they toss out 7's like candy (to keep the lights on).Fuck IGN
They're just mad the game made them shit their pants a little.Fuck IGN
oh shit!I don't think this post is as smart or as insightful as you hoped it'd be.
It’s complete bull. They knew they couldn’t base an article on just two games so they decided to throw Outlaws in there when most likely the game is selling like hotcakes.While I do think people follow mainstream sites like IGN less (Kotaku is kind of dead), the premise of the article is a bit suspect considering the author is saying “Star Wars: Outlaws” is not selling.
I don’t think we have any numbers for that and I would be surprised if a Ubisoft Star Wars Open World game didn’t sell relatively well.
If you think this was bad, this upcoming era of influence is due to be much worse.That's so weird. They're highly reputable too
It’s complete bull. They knew they couldn’t base an article on just two games so they decided to throw Outlaws in there when most likely the game is selling like hotcakes.
Aside Avatar saying "hi", Star Wars game will sell with or without media due to its IP. It is like Hogwarts Legacy game - no matter how triggered folks on Resetera are or media outlets, it will sell.While I do think people follow mainstream sites like IGN less (Kotaku is kind of dead), the premise of the article is a bit suspect considering the author is saying “Star Wars: Outlaws” is not selling.
I don’t think we have any numbers for that and I would be surprised if a Ubisoft Star Wars Open World game didn’t sell relatively well.