I'm curious what made this film so different from 99% of the streaming slop we get from netflix, amazon, etc even with big $$$ budgets, directors, and actors involved. Would 6 Underground have looked better on the big screen? Rebel Moon? The Grey Man? I wonder if there was some sort of fundamentally different way it was made that set it apart in a way that can make future films more predicably "theater worthy" versus "streaming slop".
I'm curious what made this film so different from 99% of the streaming slop we get from netflix, amazon, etc even with big $$$ budgets, directors, and actors involved.
For starters, it originated with good source material, and was then adapted by a guy who has a good track record for adaptations, and the producers were people who actually gave a damn about the quality.