Lysandros
Member
Okay. So is it confirmed that they removed 'nothing' from desktop variant besides cutting down L3 cache amount?Series X has a normal sized Zen 2's FPU.
Okay. So is it confirmed that they removed 'nothing' from desktop variant besides cutting down L3 cache amount?Series X has a normal sized Zen 2's FPU.
He is just guessing AVX2 is most likely not removed.
In terms of size doesn't seems like, cache is more in line with Renoir, except that just the PS5's FPU is smaller.Okay. So is it confirmed that they removed 'nothing' from desktop variant besides cutting down L3 cache amount?
I don't agree too... I just shared because he is guessing and not really confirming AVX256 is removed.He did, i don't agree with NXgamer on this specific case.
Okay, thanks. Well, that makes sense if they removed the FADD block.In terms of size doesn't seems like, cache is more in line with Renoir, except that just the PS5's FPU is smaller.
He only has selective concern.......So much concern .... it's like some people said ps5 was rdna 1 and it bounced to the xsx too, but surprisingly you missed or don't care when people call ps5 rdna 1 or 1.5.
It is interesting that the PS5's chip layout is similar to the PS4 Pro's butterfly design and not to the vanilla PS4. This could mean that they applied what they learned designing the PS4 Pro and that a theoretical PS5 Pro needs to use completely different chip layout, making it somewhat less likely.Nice comparisons showing the die shots of last gen and current gen.
*Images not scaled to size.
![]()
![]()
![]()
They didn't swear they had those features. Maybe try listening to the video or reading the article. If you can find where he states it as a fact post it here?I wanna hear from these so called insiders like Red Tech Gaming who swore that PS5 had infinity cache and other RDNA 3 features. Sony has yet to provide information on ps5 RDNA 2 features or a die shot.
I would have an easier time believing this if they kept "most powerful console ever"and didn't change to " most powerful xbox" within a month of release.I guess this is why MS showed their die shot forever ago. They knew they have the advantage, and it'll show even more later down the road.
Yeah, maybe he just doesn't know about the later posts. I hope this won't add further fuel to misinformation.I don't agree too... I just shared because he is guessing and not really confirming AVX256 is removed.
Locuza changed his initial guesses too.
It is more likely others parts of the FPU were reworked/removed.
Where did I "wink and nudge" on that post? Another disingenuous accusation.
"One gave us die shots almost a year ago, while the other didn't till 3 months after launch. If the specs are everything you said they were. Why hide it so long?"
I am not playing both sides and I am not trying to add fuel to the fire. I am not trying to get people to antagonise you either.Funny it took you this long to reply while trying to encourage someone else to antagonize me. Thats why people called you out as a disingenuous poster who likes to play both side just to add fuel to the fire.
In here and elsewhere you and a few others have seemingly a clear picture of me and this kind of bullying tactic ("most disingenuous poster on GAF" is apparently one of the prizes I won there) is making That thread somewhat unwelcoming (my comments in the Xbox OT are not meant to shit it up at all, despite the point ai raised about GPU being best left to other threads despite done with not the intention I was accused of... I could have avoided that to say the least).Next time don't hide behind others trying to encourage flamebait. It makes you look bad, regardless of your bad reputation here already.
It's funnyu how your concern only applies to one side eh?Trying to insinuate "concern trolling" , things like stupid, shut up, leave the forum and etc are being antagonistic.
Anyway, neither of you could answer why you derailed the thread to be about the xsx die which we saw almost a year ago. Nice job deflecting![]()
PS5 supports 256 bit native instructions.
Cerny himself said during the road to
PS5 (Timestamped).
Terms like RDNA 3 features, is putting the cart before the horse, maybe he should've said this PS5 feature is likely to appear in RDNA 3, maybe that could've been more palatable to you (I doubt it)I wanna hear from these so called insiders like Red Tech Gaming who swore that PS5 had infinity cache and other RDNA 3 features. Sony has yet to provide information on ps5 RDNA 2 features or a die shot.
PS5 supports 256 bit native instructions.
Cerny himself said during the road to
PS5 (Timestamped).
It's funny how your concern only applies to one side eh? Your subtle attempts at being neutral make you even more of a warriorTrying to insinuate "concern trolling" , things like stupid, shut up, leave the forum and etc are being antagonistic.
Anyway, neither of you could answer why you derailed the thread to be about the xsx die which we saw almost a year ago. Nice job deflecting![]()
He gets everything from Locuza and then tries to spin as though he's the brainsFanboism has screw his mind. The funny things he has the courage to blame whatever to Sony fanboy when his major contribution it's just laughing to the other posters with mostly nonsense argumentations and zero knowledge of what he talking about.
You're welcome, i can't stand some people are spreading FUD, from which they heard was someone else's guess and take it to their hearts like a "Second coming".Thank you for posting this Rea, i couldn't find the exact moment where he said that for some reason. Maybe someone should post this to NXgamer's twitter, i don't have an account.
Pretty much any rumor was bullshit. And now we see that everything said by Cerny during the talk is actually in there., Surprise!So the Zen 3 rumors were bullshit? I'm shocked.
side note here - Locuza is one of the good guys. If he delivered ammo for either of the Fanboys it was 100% unintentional - if anything he gave the Sony camp some ammo by soing his latest "Xbox X = RDNA2 ? Video..He gets everything from Locuza and then tries to spin as though he's the brains
FPU was a waste in PS1 era... after all we were coming from 2D to very simple 3D models.I think the cut in FPUs is understandable as that's why there's the GE, again when Sony designed the PlayStation 1 they decided that having FPU processor was just a waste, as FPUs are for complex calculations such as statistical analysis, but for 3D Graphic processing it's time consuming due to the complexity and thus they omitted it completely. So to get those fancy graphics on screen fast, they engineered the Geometry Transformation Engine, which performed less complex math calculations very fast. (Hint: the GTE also had some light calculation functions)
But this is my take on it, I'm just learning.![]()
Quake I's feats included being one of the first complex games requiring the use of an FPU so that tells you how new it all was. PS2's GS still has remnants of that fixed point past too.I think the cut in FPUs is understandable as that's why there's the GE, again when Sony designed the PlayStation 1 they decided that having FPU processor was just a waste, as FPUs are for complex calculations such as statistical analysis, but for 3D Graphic processing it's time consuming due to the complexity and thus they omitted it completely. So to get those fancy graphics on screen fast, they engineered the Geometry Transformation Engine, which performed less complex math calculations very fast. (Hint: the GTE also had some light calculation functions)
But this is my take on it, I'm just learning.![]()
Maybe it's just better at literature.So now we know, the PS5 doesn't even do math!
It's magical!So now we know, the PS5 doesn't even do math!
So the cut is the FADD, I'm still learning so what is FADD & could the cut be related to the GE.... I'm sure Cerny wouldn't remove features that would hinder performance/improve it.FPU was a waste in PS1 era... after all we were coming from 2D to very simple 3D models.
Game development changed and FPU is pretty much used today... Cerny even highlighted the use of native AVX256.
PS5 when you throw a maths problem at it:So now we know, the PS5 doesn't even do math!
I am not sure it is saying that though.PS5 is more based off of RDNA1 architecture and was ready for release probably at least a year before XSX
He is just guessing AVX2 is most likely not removed.
Lmao I love all the dismissive fanboy comments. Typical loser replies when they lost the battle. "I never really cared anyway." Cracks me up every time.
Microsoft have a talk today, I think it's main focus will be ML, but there could be more on what's to come moving forward with the architecture.So basically what this seems to boil down to is what i got banned in the speculation thread for saying... PS5 is more based off of RDNA1 architecture and was ready for release probably at least a year before XSX... PS5 tools had MUCH more time to mature. XSX was waiting for more RDNA2 features to implement so tools are way behind. Hence why we are seeing PS5 keeping up at the moment. Once XSX hits its full stride and the tools have a chance to mature more it very well may had an advantage period moving forward. *tooools
Maybe I should become an insider and spew nonsense as long as I say " take it with a pinch of salt" ill still keep my credibility . You can make the most outlandish claims and say "take this with a grain of salt" and everything is ok right? Always these anonymous sources that are never vetted.Terms like RDNA 3 features, is putting the cart before the horse, maybe he should've said this PS5 feature is likely to appear in RDNA 3, maybe that could've been more palatable to you (I doubt it)
But click bait videos aside, and you obviously haven't watched any of them, he indicated every one of the things you mentioned was a rumour and to be taken with a pinch of salt.
What I imagine happened is he reached out to ask his sources why PS5 was outperforming the Series X and got a few guesses in return. Hardly worth burning him at the stake for really. But whatever fits the narrative you've built for yourself.
Microsoft have a talk today, I think it's main focus will be ML, but there could be more on what's to come moving forward with the architecture.![]()
There's no point. We're all going to DIE anyway.
Didn't someone get shot? Who died?